I was wondering if the fact that I never used the floppy version was the reason I didn't feel the need to differentiate, but it seems that it's more complicated.
I was wondering if the fact that I never used the floppy version was the reason I didn't feel the need to differentiate, but it seems that it's more complicated.
So, even if the resources for renewables are more expensive, there's no argument that goes in favour of fossil fuels.
So, even if the resources for renewables are more expensive, there's no argument that goes in favour of fossil fuels.
Mathematically, fossil fuels need to fill the area under an energy usage curve, while renewables only need to meet an increase.
And after a few centuries, when everyone's energy usage has increased tenfold, fossil
Mathematically, fossil fuels need to fill the area under an energy usage curve, while renewables only need to meet an increase.
And after a few centuries, when everyone's energy usage has increased tenfold, fossil
The same is true if you went from 20 to 21, 100 to 101, etc. It has to meet the increase.
With fossil fuels, you need to not only obtain the resources for that extra 1kWh/day on the last day, and the slightly less the day
The same is true if you went from 20 to 21, 100 to 101, etc. It has to meet the increase.
With fossil fuels, you need to not only obtain the resources for that extra 1kWh/day on the last day, and the slightly less the day
But, it's still worth transitioning to renewables. Mathematically, the cost of extracting resources for renewables and fossil fuels aren't comparable.
If your personal energy usage goes from 10kWh/day at the beginning of the year to
But, it's still worth transitioning to renewables. Mathematically, the cost of extracting resources for renewables and fossil fuels aren't comparable.
If your personal energy usage goes from 10kWh/day at the beginning of the year to
If you can figure out how, fame and fortune await.
If you can figure out how, fame and fortune await.