Brett Baker
@archaeal.bsky.social
2.2K followers 1K following 110 posts
Professor of microbial ecology and evolution at Univ of Texas Austin.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
archaeal.bsky.social
Baker Lab 2025

The container is our field gear for the research expedition for Uruguay.

sites.utexas.edu/baker-lab/sp...
archaeal.bsky.social
Thanks so much Vaughn!
archaeal.bsky.social
Title: The phylogeny and metabolism underlying the global dominance of the freshwater Nanopelagicaceae lineage
Short Talk Symposia: Hot Topics in Microbial Diversity and Systematics
Session  6/21/2025 1:45- 3:45:00 403A
Presentation Time: 3:15:00 PM
archaeal.bsky.social
Tomorrow at 12:45-1:30 in the EEB Track Hub in the poster hall #ASMmicrobe I am talking about microbial diversity including Asgard archaea, and an expanded tree of life from marine sediments.
archaeal.bsky.social
Today at ASM Microbe - Carbon Cycling & Methylotrophy In Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Sediments Presentation Number: 5699 Date: Friday June 20th Time - Poster (10:30-11:30am, 4-5pm) AND Rapid Fire Talk (11:45-12:30pm) @emilyraehyde.bsky.social
archaeal.bsky.social
The Baker Lab is invading LA for #ASMMicrobe
Reposted by Brett Baker
texasscience.bsky.social
Andy Ellington of @utaustin.bsky.social was a project participant in this new release, which also features research from the lab of UT marine scientist Brett Baker @archaeal.bsky.social
asm.org
ASM @asm.org · Jun 16
How did life begin & why does it matter? A new ASM report, supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, explores the origins of microbial life & how understanding it can help tackle some of humanity’s biggest questions around climate, biotech & more. Press release➡️ asm.org/press-releas...
Report cover page
Reposted by Brett Baker
asm.org
ASM @asm.org · Jun 16
How did life begin & why does it matter? A new ASM report, supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, explores the origins of microbial life & how understanding it can help tackle some of humanity’s biggest questions around climate, biotech & more. Press release➡️ asm.org/press-releas...
Report cover page
archaeal.bsky.social
Stay away from me. I’m a horrible person, not looking to meet anyone.
archaeal.bsky.social
added more mappings below ;) We fundamentally disagree with their findings. The potential combination is extremely low. I say potential because we are looking more closely at it. But overall, not much at all.
archaeal.bsky.social
Well said, but well represented or accurate? See the mappings I provided.
archaeal.bsky.social
Well said, but not well represented in the paper. Another example, B6, they claim to be contaminated (shown in Fig 2a). Green are the correct reads from which the MAG was generated. Location markers used for phylogeny in Eme et al in pink.
archaeal.bsky.social
Terrible question.
archaeal.bsky.social
The answer is yes, haha.
Reposted by Brett Baker
jacquelyngill.bsky.social
We need you--every single one of you-- in the US to stand up, right now, and fight for NSF, NIH, USGS, NASA, USDA. Agencies Congress empowered to serve the public with impactful science and innovation. This is not a drill. This is our last stand. After this, there will be nothing left to fight for.
archaeal.bsky.social
The implications are Nature level, but this is not what we are finding in the data.
archaeal.bsky.social
I have a lot of struggles with this paper
archaeal.bsky.social
This ^^^^ My first thought! The potential contamination messing up phylogeny makes no sense.
Reposted by Brett Baker
lauraeme.bsky.social
We must have been super lucky that contamination was all from different lineages to each Njord MAG and yet all from the same clade of unknown Asgard so that Njord form monophyletic groups within Asgards in individual gene trees.