That was an amazing 90 second response by that community.

Sorry it was free to me and I didn’t even sign in…

“appears to be no more or less effective”

I mean, logically the only other option is that it’s “exactly as effective as”… that’s obviously what the authors concluded based on solid data, right?

/s

They could at least try harder. It’s not like her age isn’t in every story this week…

Imagine if the actual goal were to reduce America’s presence and soft power in the world…

Now, look how much things make sense!

*That* was the joke?

Yes this is why this time around he has avoided having any such people anywhere near his cabinet.

2nd thing. Is hard but is way.

Also, (partly) why my blogging to do list is constantly growing…

Was gonna say, why just punching…

Also I suspect nobody identified themselves as law enforcement officers.

He literally doesn't know how to joke.

My point which maybe was not well made was, it's pointless to try to suggest to *this administration* that it should revise its processes, or even follow to any process, when it is clearly ignoring *all processes* (it doesn't like) and just doing whatever it wants.

Some.

But I'm more specifically referring to processes for:
- Spending congressionally approved funds
- Making changes to historic buildings/landmarks
- Due process for individuals
- Firing protected gov employees
- Hatch Act and other corruption-preventing processes

etc etc

Everything about the process(es) used by this administration is shit but pointing it out for a year hasn't caused them to reconsider any of them.

or more simply and colloquially, verbing. Which uses verbing to describe verbing.