I would just say to pick up a book in any of those categories, and they will likely be belligerently arguing against someone who you can, subsequently, read and follow down the line :)

u should read "THE CAT AND OLD RAT" by La Fontaine ... contemplating the ole Katze und Maus tale www.la-fontaine-ch-thierry.net/threeweaselc...

not sure I'd call it "superior" given they felt it necessary to be absolutely as racist as possible, but it was good to use a foundational contract to establish a republic... even if the Supreme Court is not a great institution.

I'm fine with centrists generally speaking, but I don't accept their arguments... I disagree with them, I don't think they're like, bad...

Don’t get me wrong, I think the DSA needs a new cohort of FP thinkers but the funny part is… so does basically the entire literal dem establishment lol. Any criticism you may have of the IC, of which *many* are legitimate, falls a lot flatter these days when you look at what the dems have said/done!

this was the big dispute btwn Douglass and Garrison, with the latter burning the Constitution publicly and the former contributing to the process that brought the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments

so much of 2017-2019 was like europeans commenting on videos of friends of mine getting beaten up like, "well, hoho, that's obviously not how I would've done it."

centrists tend to act like the left has a simplified understanding of US history, and I'm just saying that's not true—look at all the debates available over crucial historical phenomena

DAME TIME BABY

DAME TIME BABY