Anthony Kevins
@avkevins.bsky.social
130 followers 160 following 9 posts
Political scientist studying how public opinion and policy interact. • Senior Lecturer at Loughborough University • UK Young Academy Member • Loughborough UCU Branch Secretary
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Anthony Kevins
ejprjournal.bsky.social
🌅📙 64.3

Governments implement public input with deliberative #MiniPublics

@avkevins.bsky.social & J.Robison investigate whether people see these groups as legitimate using surveys in 🇬🇧 to understand public support for #ClimareAssemblies

🔗https://buff.ly/iggUFJM
Do the origins of climate assemblies shape public reactions? Examining the impact of partisanship
ANTHONY KEVINS, JOSHUA ROBISON
ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
avkevins.bsky.social
🚨Now officially in print!🚨

Do the (partisan) origins of climate assemblies affect public support for these assemblies?

Using original UK survey data, Joshua Robison and I explore this question in a new EJPR article.

Check it out open access here: doi.org/10.1111/1475...
avkevins.bsky.social
Many thanks to our guests and to everyone who attended and contributed to such a thoughtful discussion!
avkevins.bsky.social
We were joined by elected representatives from three different levels of government:

• Cllr. Margaret Smidowicz – Charnwood Borough Councillor
• Dr. Jeevun Sandher – MP for Loughborough
• Cllr. Naomi Bottomley – Charnwood Borough Councillor and Leicestershire County Councillor
avkevins.bsky.social
On Friday, I had the pleasure of hosting an event on “Life in Politics,” sponsored by the @lborocrcc.bsky.social and the @lborouniversity.bsky.social Department of International Relations, Politics and History.
avkevins.bsky.social
🚨New #OpenAccess study 🚨

What types of people are more or less satisfied with social care in the UK - and how might age and ideology interact to shape satisfaction levels?

Naomi Lightman and I explore these questions in a new, open-access IJSW article: doi.org/10.1111/ijsw...
Reposted by Anthony Kevins
Reposted by Anthony Kevins
rsenninger.bsky.social
The super election year is ending, with many winners and losers.

Our new @thejop.bsky.social paper, (@henrikseeberg.bsky.social, @martinbaekgaard.bsky.social ) asks: How do winning and losing candidates see elections?

Spoiler: Losers are more concerned about fairness.
Link: doi.org/10.1086/734240
Reposted by Anthony Kevins
moritz-marbach.com
🚨New Tool: paper-picnic.com The latest published political science research (and research in adjacent fields) every Friday. No alert chaos, no registration, no clutter. Powered by @crossref.bsky.social
avkevins.bsky.social
🚨New #OpenAccess study🚨

Do the (partisan) origins of climate assemblies affect public support for these assemblies?

Using original UK survey data, Joshua Robison and I explore this question in a new EJPR article.

Check it out open access here: doi.org/10.1111/1475...
Governments around the world are experimenting with deliberative mini-publics as a means of integrating public input into policymaking processes, including as a method for directly creating policy. This raises the important question of when ordinary people will judge the outputs of mini-publics to be legitimate and support their use. We investigate how public support for mini-publics is shaped by: (1) whether the mini-public is held in response to calls from politicians or from the general public; (2) which political party sets up the mini-public; and (3) whether there is partisan conflict surrounding the mini-public’s creation. To do so, we use two pre-registered survey experiments fielded in the United Kingdom that focus on climate assemblies, a prominent form of deliberative mini-public. Results are three-fold. First, we find some evidence that assemblies are more positively evaluated when they stem from the demands of local residents rather than partisan actors, but this effect is relatively modest and does not emerge consistently across our analyses. Similar findings are noted with regard to partisanship. Partisan conflict, by contrast, has a more robust effect – leading respondents to adopt more ideologically stereotypical views of the assembly, with left-wing (right-wing) respondents being more supportive of Labour-sponsored (Conservative-sponsored) assemblies.
Reposted by Anthony Kevins
alexanderhorn.bsky.social
free book in honor of Kees van Kersbergen! For the Festschrift (eds. Green Pedersen/Jensen/Vis) @avkevins.bsky.social & I wrote "Ever the committed egalitarians – or the end of Scandinavian exceptionalism? Equality and welfare state preferences among voters and parties" @ politica.dk/boeger/no-no...