Ruth Dassonneville
@rdassonneville.bsky.social
4.6K followers 1.5K following 280 posts
Prof at KU Leuven CRC in Electoral Democracy at Université de Montréal https://ruthdassonneville.netlify.app/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
rdassonneville.bsky.social
What a fantastic collection of papers! 👀
davidattewell6.bsky.social
@dpzollinger.bsky.social and I are thrilled "Cleavage Politics in Western Democracies" is out as an SI at @wepsocial.bsky.social!

Its papers explore the foundations of the cleavage pitting new left against radical right parties, and how it compares to the classic cleavages of Lipset & Rokkan:

🧵⬇️
Reposted by Ruth Dassonneville
alexiakatsanidou.bsky.social
Great paper on the state of political science osf.io/preprints/os... by @guygrossman.bsky.social et. al. We have become more diverse, more quantitative, and more collaborative.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
Nogmaals gefeliciteerd Daan, en wat een geweldige foto :D
rdassonneville.bsky.social
🥹 Finally, we presented this paper, in different stages, at *lots* of different places. Thanks so much for everyone who gave us comments and suggestions!
rdassonneville.bsky.social
👉 In sum, citizens react to a wide variety of group appeals, but there is much heterogeneity in their responses. Our results indicate that social identity, and especially deservingness perceptions, are key to explaining this variation!
rdassonneville.bsky.social
‼️We find stronger effects for deservingness. Among in- & out-groups, those who think the group is more deserving strongly reward a candidate appealing to that group. Those who think the group already gets more than it deserves, in contrast, evaluate candidates appealing to the group more negatively.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
❗We do find that the positive effects of exposure to out-group appeals is significantly reduced among strong identifiers, but even they do not punish candidates using group appeals.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
In terms of the moderation effects, we find weak evidence for the idea that stronger identifiers respond more positively to group appeals.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
🔍 We further expanded the N of groups we considered in Study 2, and across groups find that group appeals consistently polarize individuals across group lines.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
We also postulated that respondents would respond more positively to appeals to groups they think are more deserving.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
🤔 We then theorized what might explain variation in reactions to group appeals, and collected more data in Study 2. First, we hypothesized that in- and out-group reactions would be stronger among those identifying more strongly with the group.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
🤯 Things were different for an appeal to young people, which young people did not respond positively to and older respondents reacted *negatively* to.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
🔍 Replicating and expanding their design, in Study 1 we find that appeals to working class, rural areas and the lower educated all increase support among in-group, with limited backlash among the out-group.
rdassonneville.bsky.social
💾 We use survey experimental data from the UK to improve our understanding of responses to group appeals. In Study 1, we build on earlier work on responses to working class appeals by Robison et al. (that paper is here journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....).
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
rdassonneville.bsky.social
Guess there are worse places to get stuck due to storm Amy #trondheim
Reposted by Ruth Dassonneville
bart-maes.bsky.social
Politicians don’t just care how many people hold an opinion — they care how good that opinion is. In our new (open-access) article in West European Politics, based on survey data from 900+ politicians across 11 countries, we show: quality > quantity. Read more: doi.org/10.1080/0140...
rdassonneville.bsky.social
Had a *fantastic* time at the Nordic Political Behavior Workshop! Great papers, engaging discussions, and super constructive feedback. Thanks so much for organizing @finseraas.bsky.social @lchristensen.bsky.social @professormpersson.bsky.social & Peter Dinesen!
rdassonneville.bsky.social
With the start of the new academic year, we're planning more talks at @vd-researchgroup.bsky.social!

Looking forward to welcoming @bjornhoyland.bsky.social in Leuven on Monday 20 October. If you're around and would like to attend, more info is here 👇

soc.kuleuven.be/afdeling-pol...
Seminar Bjørn Høyland
soc.kuleuven.be
Reposted by Ruth Dassonneville
annerasmussen.bsky.social
🚨 New paper in @thejop.bsky.social

Why do politicians often misperceive what citizens' policy positions are?

@simonotjes.bsky.social and I study ~10,000 estimates of public opinion by politicians in Denmark & the Netherlands to uncover the sources of these (mis)perceptions

Thread 🧵1/10
rdassonneville.bsky.social
Had an amazing two days discussing challenges to democracy with a great group of researchers! Thanks so much for organizing!
umcerim.bsky.social
Great event co-hosted with BrIAS on Challenges to Democracy. Grateful to all panelists for their insights and to everyone who joined us for the lively and inspiring discussions! @dfuturevub.bsky.social @sciencepoulb.bsky.social
Reposted by Ruth Dassonneville
gillespittoors.bsky.social
🌍📢 Exciting news: @lucykinski.bsky.social, @wouterwolfs.bsky.social and myself have launched the ECPR Research Network on Democracy and Representation in a Transnational Space!

We aim to connect scholars studying transnational politics, democracy & representation in Europe.

ecpr.eu/Group/democr...
Democracy and Representation in a Transnational Space
European Consortium for Political Research
ecpr.eu