I think about it the same way as Stephen: it’s like a bad intern who has no possibility of improving or any other redeeming qualities that would make the extra “supervision” labor worth it. But I’m interested to read the new opinion! Maybe it will change my mind.

Judge Langholz explains the origin of (cleaned up) and its rapid adoption, and then explains in plain terms why the parenthetical is useful. /2

Another good review, but this time with bonus state law (??!!) content. I appreciate in particular the succinct explanation of why (citation modified) is 👎🙄.

bsky.app/profile/djsz...

Another good review, but this time with bonus state law (??!!) content. I appreciate in particular the succinct explanation of why (citation modified) is 👎🙄.

bsky.app/profile/djsz...

Ooh! I haven’t tried it yet, but I did love the logic games. I hope Pips can recapture the magic of trying to seat eight people at a dinner party with different entrees and drinks!

I love love love this idea of fruit covered in LWI stickers. This is both hilarious and useful! Imagine the puns.

I got a little branded flashlight in a swag bag this summer and liked that. Sort of like mini umbrellas - can never have too many bc they evaporate somehow.

I also use that bag! It’s a nice size and shape, although admittedly I am mostly putting in my car, which is roomier than Stephen’s bike saddle bags.

Chunks, because they are less messy. But kids seem to prefer wedges. Plus wedges are less work to make.

If it’s just me alone in my house the correct approach is to halve the watermelon and use a spoon.

Fair point 😂😂

My aunt said that her friend raised one from a caterpillar and it grew to be 18 inches across!

Thank you for the shout out!

They should replace LAWN with a Junimo Hut to increase efficiency.

I’m also thinking of these signals in the practical usage context and how bringing over the law review complexity to briefs etc often isn’t helpful - different purposes and audiences, different use of sources etc.

And in a footnote! Agree as always with David.

The compare (and now contrast) signals seem like unnecessary complications bc you can write the same sentence without italicizing the signal and it still works. But maybe now invites a bit more explanation for the reader about the sources.

(reasoning obscured)