Obama, und die Vorhersage ist vermutlich ein weißer Mann?

Link for "A meta-analysis on the productive value of crop biodiversity" (American Journal of Agricultural Economics, with B. Largier):

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

Maybe this (response to me posting about a similar problem): bsky.app/profile/fboe...

We already know the solution to these kinds of externality problems: heavy taxes on supply or an outright ban on the sale of fireworks. But certain champagne liberalists will immediately frame it as an attack on freedom.

Starting with the chancellor😉

Isn't Danish cuisine essentially potatoes and rye bread?

That's strange... It makes sense to uninvite reviewers one doesn't need anymore, but not those who already agreed to review🤦🏻‍♂️ I mean, what's the harm in having one more review?

Es gibt teilweise falsch zugeordnete Zitate. Ist aber natürlich nur eine Auswahl. Also schon eher nur in eine Richtung.

Soll heißen: schon immer kam es im Internet darauf an, Quellen kompetent zu nutzen und nicht allem zu glauben, was einem übern Weg läuft. Das ist mit LLMs zugegebenermaßen schwieriger geworden, aber ich meine, bisher noch im eher quantitativen, nicht qualitativen Sinne.

Wikiquotes. Problem solved.

Are you calling for a moratorium on PhD positions/research training groups? Or, asked differently: what do you expect from me/the other PIs? Shouldn't we have applied for the RTG?

In the grand scheme of things, I see you point: there is a clear imbalance between base and third-party funding, between PhD positions and other types of positions and between non-permanent vs. permanent positions. But this one RTG is not the grand scheme of things. It's just an RTG.

ECO-N is DFG-funded, so in that sense independent of whatever else the University can or cannot do🤷🏻‍♂️

It's pretty regular, it doesn't have any crazy constructs like the English tenses or the Slavic aspects