Michael Battalio
banner
battalio.com
Michael Battalio
@battalio.com
Research Scientist at Yale studying planetary climates
Twenty-fourth Annual Christmas Mass Email on your Personal Continuum
December 25, 2025 at 6:36 PM
Proud to see the first paper (out in @agu.org JGRPlanets) from Dr. Campbell, the postdoc @sguzewich.bsky.social and I mentor. She did a spectacular job explaining the source of the odd dust activity (called the B-storm) during Mars's SH summer. #planetaryscience #Mars 🪐🧪🔭

doi.org/10.1029/2025...
December 15, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Wrote to @delauro.house.gov of @ctdems.bsky.social about this. She's the minority leader on appropriations and been in congress since 1991. We need new Dem leaders top to bottom. They're clueless.
December 12, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Wow, this looks exactly like the five cyclones around Jupiter's South Pole.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
October 29, 2025 at 8:37 PM
The full comments I wrote to the CNN writer. I'm delighted the part they pulled is about the broader usefulness of studying Mars.
October 8, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Avi Loeb and I talk the importance of rigorous peer review before claiming aliens.
September 16, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Elsevier's newest employee. h/t Adam Deitsch
August 13, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Screenshot to not feed the troll. I see this occasionally, and it's worth it to respond. My pinned skeet says that "cool stuff that happens on one [climate] has parallels to help interpret the others." Let give an example that I'm writing up right now.
July 25, 2025 at 3:00 PM
July 20, 2025 at 1:24 PM
Analysis by the fantastic Mike Wong at Berkeley proves how bad ROSES 2025 is. 82% cut for solar system research. Our only hope is that Congress ignores Trump/Vought, and the program officers can fill this back up. More depressing graphs on his blog.

research.ssl.berkeley.edu/~mikewong/bl...
July 12, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Things are going great. 95°F/83°F=121°F heat index.

AC struggling.
June 23, 2025 at 6:47 PM
93°F/82°F at 10:20 in the morning. Heat index is 116°F.
What are we doing here? This would be bad for MS much less CT.
June 23, 2025 at 2:26 PM
The President's Budget request as released yesterday will gut scientific research. Why should you care?
1) Science is fundamentally a jobs program. Many 100,000s are employed to do science and work for you, the US taxpayer.
May 31, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Made a list of NASA cut highlights(?) by request with references to the NASA budget request.

www.nasa.gov/fy-2026-budg...
May 31, 2025 at 12:29 AM
I'm going to do something a bit dangerous and contradict a narrative—example screenshot and more in alt for context, but I've seen this in a couple of threads now. I'm only research faculty, but I have seen lists of students the actual faculty consider for admission at Yale.
May 25, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Got spam to my work email from The Weather Company advertising themselves as "world's most accurate forecaster.*" [Asterisk theirs; ha.] I've never engaged them before. Scientists in industry may defend NWS against dismantling by DOGE/P25, but that's not how their business offices see the situation.
May 20, 2025 at 3:15 PM
While most science is halved (see great post quoted), NASA is only cut by 25%. That difference isn't because *science* in NASA isn't also destroyed. It's because NASA's budget for crewed missions by unnamed private space companies balloons, hiding in the topline that NASA science is decimated too.
May 3, 2025 at 4:30 PM
This not about efficiency. This is about eliminating scientists as an objective source of information outside the control of Trump/Musk/Project2025 authors. Since Inauguration, the US government has spent MORE money this year than last year.
April 11, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Cuts to #science of >50% at NASA and >75% at NOAA would end US climate and space science research.

NASA cuts are '...an "extinction level" event': arstechnica.com/space/2025/0...
"At this funding level, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research is eliminated...": www.science.org/content/arti...
April 11, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Famously in my hometown of Vicksburg, there are marks on the flood gates separately indicating the 1927 flood as it happened and as if the levees had held. Standing near the river bank and lookup back up is fairly unsettling.

Credit: Library of Congress www.loc.gov/resource/hig...
April 8, 2025 at 12:44 AM
This low-high-low pattern happens for an independent measure of the dust too, called the column optical depth. This is measured differently than the reanalysis dataset we used to calculate the mode from winds, so the effect of the Annular Mode is in two different datasets on 3 different variables.
April 2, 2025 at 5:24 PM
This is important because winds lift dust. The 150 day period of the mode/winds imparts similar repeatability of the surface stress. The stress basically estimates friction that picks up dust. In these plots, at Lag±75 sols there is low (blue) stress near the pole, but at Lag=0, stress is big (red).
April 2, 2025 at 5:24 PM
This shift back and forth isn't random. Mars (& Earth)'s modes migrate towards the pole every 150 sols (or Mars days). The blue blob in the fig goes from 30°N at -70 sols at bottom left to 75°N at +70 sol at top right. And the next cycle starts at the same 70 sol time at 30°N again.
April 2, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Wikipedia faster than Schumer.
April 1, 2025 at 11:21 PM
5.) Kevin McCarthy: you kissed Trump’s ring and were disgracefully kicked out of the House anyway last May.
April 1, 2025 at 6:12 PM