Brandon Claycomb
@bclaycomb.bsky.social
Reposted by Brandon Claycomb
as long as the material conditions of people’s lives are tied to patterns of racial inequality — as long as racism marks them as racialized people exposed to some
of the worst forms of social domination and class inequality — then there is no disregarding race as a social reality
of the worst forms of social domination and class inequality — then there is no disregarding race as a social reality
May 1, 2025 at 9:03 PM
as long as the material conditions of people’s lives are tied to patterns of racial inequality — as long as racism marks them as racialized people exposed to some
of the worst forms of social domination and class inequality — then there is no disregarding race as a social reality
of the worst forms of social domination and class inequality — then there is no disregarding race as a social reality
I hear you.
To me it’s the kind of error that matters here. Strategic misjudgment akin to Schumer’s.
She could overcome this. But she’d have to recognize and acknowledge the mistake and then lead in the opposite direction. That’s a huge shift
To me it’s the kind of error that matters here. Strategic misjudgment akin to Schumer’s.
She could overcome this. But she’d have to recognize and acknowledge the mistake and then lead in the opposite direction. That’s a huge shift
April 30, 2025 at 12:42 AM
I hear you.
To me it’s the kind of error that matters here. Strategic misjudgment akin to Schumer’s.
She could overcome this. But she’d have to recognize and acknowledge the mistake and then lead in the opposite direction. That’s a huge shift
To me it’s the kind of error that matters here. Strategic misjudgment akin to Schumer’s.
She could overcome this. But she’d have to recognize and acknowledge the mistake and then lead in the opposite direction. That’s a huge shift
Me too.
Your strengths become a weakness if you misunderstand when to use them. She’s currently the most successful bipartisan Dem politician. And that’s a losing category. Pritzker is such a contrast
Your strengths become a weakness if you misunderstand when to use them. She’s currently the most successful bipartisan Dem politician. And that’s a losing category. Pritzker is such a contrast
April 30, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Me too.
Your strengths become a weakness if you misunderstand when to use them. She’s currently the most successful bipartisan Dem politician. And that’s a losing category. Pritzker is such a contrast
Your strengths become a weakness if you misunderstand when to use them. She’s currently the most successful bipartisan Dem politician. And that’s a losing category. Pritzker is such a contrast
OK. This is just sad.
He’s got nothing
He’s got nothing
April 29, 2025 at 5:23 PM
OK. This is just sad.
He’s got nothing
He’s got nothing