Ben Zaranko
@benzaranko.bsky.social
6.3K followers 230 following 390 posts
Economist at the IFS
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
benzaranko.bsky.social
Hello - it hasn't gone up quite that much in the past year. Debt interest expected to be £111bn this year, up from £106bn last year. The key thing is that £111bn is more than double what we we might have reasonably expected a few years ago (>£60bn higher than the March 2022 forecast for this year).
benzaranko.bsky.social
True. Shift in spending towards food and gas..?
benzaranko.bsky.social
I did think it was weird that inflation was proving stubbornly high, but VAT receipts were coming in surprisingly low... Good news for Rachel Reeves
chrisgiles.ft.com
There goes my long held view that cash government receipts were accurate because you just had to add some columns in a bank account

on.ft.com/3J0Y6yE ONS revises down government borrowing estimates after data error
ONS revises down UK government borrowing by £2bn after VAT error
[FREE TO READ] Office for National Statistics reduces estimate for current fiscal year just weeks before Rachel Reeves’ Budget
on.ft.com
benzaranko.bsky.social
On 17 October, I'll be the least impressive panel member at this event at the LSE, debating the role of independent institutions and technocrats in guiding UK fiscal policy.

If that sounds like your idea of a good Friday night, sign up here:

www.eventbrite.com/e/a-sustaina...
benzaranko.bsky.social
People shout that at me everywhere I go
benzaranko.bsky.social
Great, thanks v much both. Will DM you!
benzaranko.bsky.social
You could imagine a framework with an independent forecaster, but without the emphasis on point estimates and pass-fail rules (I write as someone working on a proposal for exactly that - if either of you would be willing/keen to chat to me about it, would love that).
benzaranko.bsky.social
We'll be covering all sorts - pressures on the public finances, options on tax, the macro outlook, issues in gilt markets. And we'll have an ex-member of both the Monetary Policy Committee and the Budget Responsibility Committee. And there will be free coffee. Come!
benzaranko.bsky.social
On 16 October we're launching this year's IFS Green Budget, looking at the major challenges & choices facing the Chancellor this autumn.

Sign up for our event! Analysis from IFS & Barclays, plus reflections from Jonathan Haskel & Andy King. It'll be great. ifs.org.uk/events/ifs-g...
IFS Green Budget 2025 | Institute for Fiscal Studies
The IFS Green Budget will assess the state of the UK economy and the government’s fiscal position ahead of the Autumn Budget.
ifs.org.uk
benzaranko.bsky.social
And here's perhaps the most eye-popping/worrying of all: of 15-year-olds who received both child disability living allowance (CDLA) and an EHCP (high-level special educational needs support) in 2014, *half* were not in education, employment or training (NEET) at age 22.
benzaranko.bsky.social
There are some eye-popping stats in this new report from my IFS colleagues.

Here's just one: 10% of teenagers now receive child disability living allowance (CDLA), up from 5% a decade ago. Just a remarkable change.
benzaranko.bsky.social
Full IMF report: www.imf.org/en/Publicati...

The IFS view is set out here. Short version: there are other ways to deal with the policy volatility problem, don't need to scrap the second forecast. ifs.org.uk/articles/how...
benzaranko.bsky.social
If the Chancellor does decide to move to only one economic and fiscal forecast per year (a move that would make us an international outlier), I really don't think it should be presented as being in line with IMF recommendations.
benzaranko.bsky.social
On the question of one vs two OBR forecasts per year...

The IMF said first best option would be to operate with more ‘headroom’. They did not call for one forecast. They suggested that the rules could be assessed only once per year, but explicitly said that two forecasts per year is best practice!
benzaranko.bsky.social
Something else I hadn't clocked until now: the UK is no longer the second biggest spender on defence within NATO. We've been overtaken by Germany.

Full chapter from this year's IFS Green Budget is here: ifs.org.uk/publications...
benzaranko.bsky.social
Some great charts in this report. This one is my favourite. The UK has signed up the new NATO commitment to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence. The scale of the increase is fiscally challenging, and we've given ourselves a decade. Poland, on the other hand, has done it in just two years.
benzaranko.bsky.social
My understanding is that it will be possible to continue tracking children in the same way, and so in 6 years we will be able to look at educational outcomes at age 11, and then keep tracking into secondary school. I don't know if there's plans to link to benefits data but I hope so!
benzaranko.bsky.social
Three years on from Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng's mini budget, I've written for @theobserveruk.bsky.social about its legacy and the lessons the Chancellor, her team and her backbench MPs (including would-be MPs) should keep in mind this autumn.

This point is especially important.
benzaranko.bsky.social
Broader point: null results are important!

I suspect this will get far less attention than studies which find "welfare cut X led to horrible outcome Y" or similar. But to set smarter policy, we also need to know what doesn't have an impact on the outcomes we care about! [3/3]
benzaranko.bsky.social
... two-child limit would be a cost-effective way to reduce child poverty. Perfectly reasonable to think that's reason alone to scrap it, and there may well be wider benefits not studied here. But it's not a magic policy lever that will help deliver all objectives at once. [2/3]
benzaranko.bsky.social
Key charts from a great thread. Careful analysis by my
@theifs.bsky.social colleagues shows that the two-child benefit limit has had no detectable impact on school-readiness at age 5, including among the poorer children most likely to be affected.

Key policy takeaway: scrapping the ... [1/3]
theifs.bsky.social
Even zooming in on poorer groups who are more likely to see larger income falls due to the policy, we still see no evidence of adverse effects on school readiness.
Chart shows the proportion of third and subsequent children achieving a good level of development by age 5, by date of birth relative to 6 April 2017, for families previously entitled to free school meals and those born in the 20% most deprived areas. Title states: "Children in families already entitled to free school meals or born in the poorest areas also saw no significant impact on school readiness from the two-child limit."
benzaranko.bsky.social
... means larger interest losses on those gilts -- losses which score against borrowing, and make the government's current budget target harder to meet. This all gets a bit complicated and messy, but it's an under-discussed determinant of the government's fiscal position. 3/3