I do agree with OP that this would be better and more fairly managed via taxes, but in the absence of a big change I'd err towards allowing the money to do good.
I do agree with OP that this would be better and more fairly managed via taxes, but in the absence of a big change I'd err towards allowing the money to do good.
I'm just a layperson, and looking at the website, the goals seem at least prima facie good. YMMV.
I'm just a layperson, and looking at the website, the goals seem at least prima facie good. YMMV.
"OK, what if we create a high UBI by taxing rich people, thereby encouraging everyone to worry less about work (less need + less upside), and more about their personal lives?"
I suspect they'd be less curious about that intervention.
"OK, what if we create a high UBI by taxing rich people, thereby encouraging everyone to worry less about work (less need + less upside), and more about their personal lives?"
I suspect they'd be less curious about that intervention.
"*Epstein linked* white supremacist extremist, (with a) long history of empty promises and fraud"
is far more accurate.
"*Epstein linked* white supremacist extremist, (with a) long history of empty promises and fraud"
is far more accurate.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
thehill.com/blogs/in-the...
thehill.com/blogs/in-the...