BlakelyC
@blakelyc.bsky.social
Post-modern technology guru, Fixer of the Broken Things, hillbilly, assassin.
Oddly, a lot like R code, which is the Perl of data science.
January 15, 2026 at 2:53 AM
Oddly, a lot like R code, which is the Perl of data science.
He drives me nuts. “Reform?” Nah, Brotherman this shit needs to be stopped right the hell now.
January 15, 2026 at 2:45 AM
He drives me nuts. “Reform?” Nah, Brotherman this shit needs to be stopped right the hell now.
Why is this notable?
November 4, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Why is this notable?
What’s the mechanism here? ERs are to determine citizenship before treating someone?
October 1, 2025 at 12:38 PM
What’s the mechanism here? ERs are to determine citizenship before treating someone?
The cringe is… palpable
September 30, 2025 at 1:07 PM
The cringe is… palpable
To be fair, local ad insertions are not normally scheduled discretely, so the advertisers likely don’t know their ads are running in those spots.
September 24, 2025 at 1:47 AM
To be fair, local ad insertions are not normally scheduled discretely, so the advertisers likely don’t know their ads are running in those spots.
This was how it began. And it was glorious.
July 19, 2025 at 12:47 AM
This was how it began. And it was glorious.
Good ol’ Russ is a True Believer. These are the most dangerous types.
July 11, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Good ol’ Russ is a True Believer. These are the most dangerous types.
I like you and your work, in general. This is bad take. Reason should engage fairly, recognizing the outsized influence of multibillionaires on the macroeconomic plight of society.
July 1, 2025 at 12:41 AM
I like you and your work, in general. This is bad take. Reason should engage fairly, recognizing the outsized influence of multibillionaires on the macroeconomic plight of society.
Topic classification will remain a huge challenge without progress on sentiment analysis. Sarcasm, in particular, is problematic. Whole of account comparison will skew negative.
June 30, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Topic classification will remain a huge challenge without progress on sentiment analysis. Sarcasm, in particular, is problematic. Whole of account comparison will skew negative.
His name is Raphael. We cannot be compelled to call him by his chosen name.
June 29, 2025 at 2:02 PM
His name is Raphael. We cannot be compelled to call him by his chosen name.
This is the spirit, but the devil is in the details. AI development must be ethical and for the benefit of all. This is currently not the case.
June 20, 2025 at 8:51 PM
This is the spirit, but the devil is in the details. AI development must be ethical and for the benefit of all. This is currently not the case.
Well-reasoned discussion is always welcome. What isn’t welcome is the intellectually and morally bankrupt waterfall that is X. It’s not about hearing from the other side. It’s about hearing from the other side that’s actually possible to engage.
June 9, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Well-reasoned discussion is always welcome. What isn’t welcome is the intellectually and morally bankrupt waterfall that is X. It’s not about hearing from the other side. It’s about hearing from the other side that’s actually possible to engage.
This is an intellectually bankrupt argument. “They” control their content and where they put it. The platform does not. Your argument means that disruption is impossible, and incumbents will always win. People go where the content is-otherwise tik tok would have been a non-starter
June 9, 2025 at 12:45 AM
This is an intellectually bankrupt argument. “They” control their content and where they put it. The platform does not. Your argument means that disruption is impossible, and incumbents will always win. People go where the content is-otherwise tik tok would have been a non-starter
Unfortunately a “c”
Is average, meaning most discussions don’t get past “I know you are but what am I”. When the speaker of the house engages in middle school-level debate tactics every day with no pushback or demand for intellectual honesty, can you expect any social network to rise above?
Is average, meaning most discussions don’t get past “I know you are but what am I”. When the speaker of the house engages in middle school-level debate tactics every day with no pushback or demand for intellectual honesty, can you expect any social network to rise above?
June 9, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Unfortunately a “c”
Is average, meaning most discussions don’t get past “I know you are but what am I”. When the speaker of the house engages in middle school-level debate tactics every day with no pushback or demand for intellectual honesty, can you expect any social network to rise above?
Is average, meaning most discussions don’t get past “I know you are but what am I”. When the speaker of the house engages in middle school-level debate tactics every day with no pushback or demand for intellectual honesty, can you expect any social network to rise above?
Perhaps a multi-billionaire patron with not a care in the world and an intense desire to not actually interfere with the free exchange and discussion of actual ideas, you know, well-reasoned points of view, rather than keeping the thumb on the scale like Elon.
June 9, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Perhaps a multi-billionaire patron with not a care in the world and an intense desire to not actually interfere with the free exchange and discussion of actual ideas, you know, well-reasoned points of view, rather than keeping the thumb on the scale like Elon.
Or, we could realize that this ai madness is counterproductive for humanity and turn our attention to ai focused on solving actual, real, problems instead of constant parlor tricks that suck resources and don’t move the revenue needle for the vast majority of companies.
June 6, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Or, we could realize that this ai madness is counterproductive for humanity and turn our attention to ai focused on solving actual, real, problems instead of constant parlor tricks that suck resources and don’t move the revenue needle for the vast majority of companies.
It needs to change, immediately. The fact that one platform controlled by one person is arguing with another platform controlled by one person… this is the precise nature of the issue.
June 6, 2025 at 12:21 AM
It needs to change, immediately. The fact that one platform controlled by one person is arguing with another platform controlled by one person… this is the precise nature of the issue.
About to close on the sale of our last property in Bergen county. Thankfully we’ll be out before this gets screwed up in the very special way that Jersey screws everything up.
May 30, 2025 at 12:39 PM
About to close on the sale of our last property in Bergen county. Thankfully we’ll be out before this gets screwed up in the very special way that Jersey screws everything up.
I really think you gotta Italian-American this one with some mid-Atlantic flair, “yo, Joey, you seen those chemtrails? Kinda like ma’s scoonjeel.”
May 21, 2025 at 12:10 PM
I really think you gotta Italian-American this one with some mid-Atlantic flair, “yo, Joey, you seen those chemtrails? Kinda like ma’s scoonjeel.”
Please do not say “deter legislative oversight”
Please say, “oversight of the article TWO branch of government by the article
ONE branch of government. Own your power and go right at it. No equivocation.
Please say, “oversight of the article TWO branch of government by the article
ONE branch of government. Own your power and go right at it. No equivocation.
May 20, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Please do not say “deter legislative oversight”
Please say, “oversight of the article TWO branch of government by the article
ONE branch of government. Own your power and go right at it. No equivocation.
Please say, “oversight of the article TWO branch of government by the article
ONE branch of government. Own your power and go right at it. No equivocation.
True believers are… true believers. This is worth respect. The ductile idiots who will bend to the whims of 47 are of no use.
May 20, 2025 at 12:14 AM
True believers are… true believers. This is worth respect. The ductile idiots who will bend to the whims of 47 are of no use.
#1, as a hillbilly, Markwayne is a stupid, but understandable name. He should rise above the assumptions people make about him, which is to say that he has necessary, but not sufficient, mental capacity to understand his actions. If he were in jail they argue, correctly, that he does not understand
May 20, 2025 at 12:00 AM
#1, as a hillbilly, Markwayne is a stupid, but understandable name. He should rise above the assumptions people make about him, which is to say that he has necessary, but not sufficient, mental capacity to understand his actions. If he were in jail they argue, correctly, that he does not understand