As Jake Tapper reports, Nexstar’s decision to cancel Kimmel must be seen in light of FCC chair Carr’s willingness to enable Nexstar’s purchase of rival Tegna. Taking a page out of Putins playbook, Trump will offer corporations monopolies in exchange for larger networks of loyalist to punish dissent.

Many thanks to @aoir.bsky.social & @zemki.bsky.social for the opportunity to share my research on the UN’s Global Digital Compact at the #AoIR2025Symposium. I discussed how its approach to data flows/AI governance reflects data colonialism and sidelines Global South calls for digital sovereignty.

“The world is now seeing Trump’s America for exactly what it is becoming: a rogue state led by an impulsive strongman disconnected from the rule of law and other constitutional American principles and values.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/15/o...

Was wondering how they would articulate CDN digital legislation as trade barriers. CIIT’s review of CUSMA in 2024 involved US-centric arguments made by USCC against Canadian digital legislation like C-27 and C-11 as threatening CUSMA digital trade agreements.

Republicans chanting "USA" in Congress reminds me of Padmé in Star Wars Ep. III: "So this is how liberty dies - with thunderous applause." But this is more than just Trumpism - it’s an act of political othering, casting those fighting for social programs like Medicaid as enemies of the state.

This is the first page of this morning’s edition of the Globe and Mail (arguably the English Canadian paper of record)
I don’t remember seeing anything like this before

So would chapter 1 of the Trump’s handbook on the subversion of democracy be about the weaponization of misinformation?

Still processing how Meta justified its decision to end third-party fact checking so as not to be ‘out of touch with mainstream discourse’

"There is no gray area here — it’s plainly unconstitutional for presidents to deny news outlets access based on their word choices," @seth-stern.bsky.social told @washingtonpost.com.

"But this type of case shouldn’t even need to go to the court of law."

2. The term attempts to shift the focus, positioning Trump as the one in charge and allowing Musk to evade accountability/public scrutiny while maintaining influence and attempting to maintain the old myth of technological neutrality.

Elon labelling his role in the WH as "tech support" highlights the 'growing pains' of Big Tech’s transition from covert political influence to a more overt, public infiltration of politics and its attempt to maintain the myth of tech neutrality.

As DOGE began infiltrating government agencies and targeting federal staff for termination, I started interviewing tech workers on the front lines. With the mass layoffs unfolding today, and with their permission, I'm sharing their stories.

This is what it's been like to endure Musk's campaign.

If Meta is cancelling fact-checking, what's there to review?

“Meta’s Oversight Board should resign en masse,” says Ben Wyskida, a spokesperson for the Real Facebook Oversight Board. www.fastcompany.com/91257773/wha...

3. It's mind boggling how many comments fail to point out the glaring irony: the world’s richest man, speaking from the Oval Office as an unelected figure is actively dismantling the U.S. government while insisting that the real threat to democracy comes from federal workers and bureaucracy

2. Such comments signal how effective Trump's tirade against traditional media has been.

1. Forbes posted the unedited clip of Elon's defence of DOGE in the oval office. I can' get over how many comments are praising Forbes for not 'spinning a partisan narrative' against Elon, as if his own speech is a neutral/objective analysis of government bureaucracy.

Time for the media to call it what it is... a coup. Excellent article by @carolecadwalla.bsky.social

The corporate-libertarian fantasy has always been to utterly dismantle government except for elements of the national security & carceral state, perhaps a few bare essentials, and whatever is conducive for oligarchs to continue accumulating yet more capital & wielding power over society & the earth.

So…is Trump the Emperor Palpatine and Musk the Darth Vader, or is it vice versa?

Have we seriously been asked to grant Musk grace and accept his fascist gesture? The same guy who used X to stoke and mobilize the far right, who spent 1/4 billion to shape the outcome of the US election, the shadow president who is now meddling in the democracies of the UK, Germany, and Canada..

A trans person didn’t deny your health insurance claim, a giant corporation did.

An asylum seeker didn’t raise your rent, a billionaire’s private equity firm did.

Our focus must be taking on the billionaires & corporate greed.

What does the future of platform political power look like? What role can alternative platforms play in challenging it?

The political power he has gained has catapulted him into a “shadow presidency” a regulator of regulators. How will other platforms that can ‘foot the bill’ respond to this novel use of platform power for political gain?

Why does Musk still value X? It’s economic value has plummeted, a considerable portion of users have fled to alternative platforms, he has alienated advertisers…

It’s the political power he’s gained. Musk has used the platform as a tool to further his own economic and political agendas.