Brainlocki3
LightNews LightNews
banner
brainlocki3.newgrounds.com
Brainlocki3
@brainlocki3.newgrounds.com
1.3K followers 6.3K following 68 posts
Autistic furry Artist, He/Him, 29.
Look at my media tab if you want to see my art.
No AI.

Pfp by UmbraBorealis.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Brainlocki3
dreameleon.bsky.social
Saw this link under a recent video on the subject;

All you have to do is enter your name and zip code where you'll then be directly connected to your reps AND be provided a script to read!
www.badinternetbills.com
February 15, 2026 at 8:36 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
tommothecabbit.bsky.social
If companies are really feeling the pressure, DO NOT STOP.

Be louder. Bully harder.
February 15, 2026 at 5:30 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
ironclaw99.bsky.social
This is still blowing up. BTW, you should be calling your fucking representatives and tell them that repealing Section 230 will destroy the internet as we know it. Dick Durbin should have fucking retired over 10 years ago.
ironclaw99.bsky.social IronClaw99 @ironclaw99.bsky.social · 6d
If you live in the US, call your fucking representatives and tell them that repealing Section 230 is a horrible idea. If Section 230 is gone, you can kiss Bluesky goodbye.
flashfennec.bsky.social Trishka Valtear @flashfennec.bsky.social · 7d
Reminder that they're still trying to repeal section 230 (thereby making platform holders like bsky legally responsible for content posted by their users etc etc)

There is still a need for you to blow up your rep's phones on this if you enjoy being able to do things like "post" or "have an porn"
February 15, 2026 at 5:10 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
echo-pbreyer.digitalcourage.social.ap.brid.gy
🇪🇺💪 Good news: 🔒 Greens/Pirates & Left file amendments to end #ChatControl 1.0 mass scanning! ✅🔥
We need to win the majority in the LIBE committee now – this is our chance!
Ask your MEPs: Are you for or against #chatcontrol? ✊⚡
https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#contact-tool
Infographic titled "Chat Control: Mass scanning of private messages". It asks: "Are your MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee (LIBE) against it yet?". The image displays a large grid with photos of many European Members of Parliament. Some are highlighted in green with a checkmark, indicating they are against mass scanning. The majority are shown with a red question mark, indicating their stance is unclear or not yet against. At the bottom is the URL fightchatcontrol.eu.
February 13, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
jackattack.bsky.social
Hey, there's that finished piece! More for the #BOXED series, the Hare. You can get a print of it over on my INPRINT: www.inprnt.com/gallery/jack...
A watercolor and color pencil drawing of a hare, stylized so that it fits snuggly in a rectangular frame. It is mostly yellows, oranges and browns. The markmaking is hatched and textural.
February 15, 2026 at 5:27 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
slayconic.bsky.social
Secret of mana cover photoshopped to say “secret of nana” and has added a photo of a shushing nana
February 15, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
tonikopantoja.bsky.social
i never posted these here but here are some zelda cdi ganondorfs i did a while back
February 15, 2026 at 6:22 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
erininthemorning.com
In incredible news, the European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly for "The Full Recognition Of Trans Women As Women."

Even the center-right European People's Party voted for the declaration.

It will form a foundation for their position at the UN Commission on the Status of Women.

Our latest.
European Parliament Votes Overwhelmingly For "The Full Recognition Of Trans Women As Women"
The resolution, though nonbinding, is a significant shot at those who seek to erode transgender rights on the continent.
www.erininthemorning.com
February 13, 2026 at 5:17 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
dieselbrain.bsky.social
The article doesnt actually mention them "distancing" themselves from Palantir, only that prompts to give your ID to Persona were "a test, which has concluded"

Continue to cancel Nitro and migrate elsewhere
February 14, 2026 at 11:08 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
moomooclover.bsky.social
teaching myself how to create vtuber models with controller tracking today :D
February 8, 2026 at 8:16 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
mannlicherhund.bsky.social
In light of the Discord news, don't forget to make your calls.

When calling your House Rep, also mention these bills:
KOSA
SCREEN Act
COPPA 2.0
RESET Act
Sammy Act
App Store Accountability Act
GAMING Act
Safe Messaging for Kids Act
Parents over Platforms Act
Sunset to Reform Section 230 Act

(1/6)
dieselbrain.bsky.social Dieselbrain @dieselbrain.bsky.social · Oct 10
#SaveSpeech

KOSA has amassed more cosponsors recently, jumping from 42 to 60 total

You need to call your reps and DEMAND that they oppose this legislation ASAP

The link below contains more info about KOSA and an easy way to contact your reps
5calls.org/issue/kids-o...

Please call DAILY
February 10, 2026 at 12:18 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
fightchatcontrol.bsky.social
The European Commission is pushing hard to extend Chat Control 1.0 - allowing mass scanning of private messages without court orders for another two years. Contact your MEPs TODAY via fightchatcontrol.eu to defend your privacy and digital rights!
February 1, 2026 at 11:35 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
pixequil.com
maintenance mode
Panel 1: Exec: "Ok guys ok ok we won't kill Adobe Animate." Crowd: "Phew" "thank fuck" "That's better" "I'm still switching to something else." "No yeah you really should" Panel 2: Exec: "Unfortunately we will also stop adding new features to it." Crowd: "WOO!!!" "It's a dream come true!" "Yeah!" "Finally!" Exec: "... um. Why are they cheering"
February 4, 2026 at 12:14 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
coelasquid.bsky.social
Looooooolllllllllllll they made Disney angry
Screenshot From the adobeanimate community on Reddit Updates on the Status of Adobe Animate (Text Preview) Hey everyone, my name is Mike Chambers, and I work on the community team at Adobe- Commentary on screenshot- "Adobe Animate is in maintenance mode. While we are no longer adding new features to Animate, we will continue to support it and provide ongoing security and bug fixes. More importantly, Animate will continue to be available for both new and existing users. This is a change from what we communicated in the email yesterday for the status of Adobe Animate, its time-frame, and availability." "To be clear, we are not discontinuing or removing access to Adobe Animate and it will continue to be available to both existing and new customers."
February 4, 2026 at 12:02 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
amras.me
Do you live in Washington State?

I need you to do two things:

1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112.
2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill.

This is SERIOUS shit. Please!

My comment in the BLUE images.
I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution. Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individuals—the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112—to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children. Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque! Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.  Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to them—on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.—to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists. I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill. Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.
January 22, 2026 at 8:16 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
kahbuki.bsky.social
💜 Daily #Skebuki No. 140
( #Sketch #OCSky )
The Han-styled court official once again but he's thinking about something he was given. 💜
January 31, 2026 at 6:54 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
acvalens.com
Most journalists have moved on from this story. Thank you Mashable and @raxsha.bsky.social for covering

mashable.com/article/adul...
Adult creators are still getting debanked — and so are others
"The line in the sand continues to shift."
mashable.com
January 30, 2026 at 1:29 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
pipesburrow.bsky.social
heckin
Graphite drawing on paper, 6x8 inches A raccoon stands squinting in the middle of a snowy landscape, wearing a scarf and a pair of mittens. Both his fur and scarf are being blown harshly by the wintery winds. Someone please invite this poor critter inside for tea and cookies. In the top middle of the image is text that reads "wimdy"
January 25, 2026 at 1:23 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
dregatheprotogen.bsky.social
Just got a hella good email from the good law project too
January 29, 2026 at 5:52 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
bridgeoffaust.bsky.social
Heart-Pounding
January 27, 2026 at 10:13 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
taylorlorenz.bsky.social
The Heritage Foundation is seeking to enact its Project 2025 goal of repealing Section 230. This would give the government complete control over online speech. It would “help stop censoring conservatives” in that the Trump admin would have full ultimate control over all information we consume online
A Measure That Would Force Big Tech To Protect Kids Online and Stop Censoring Conservatives
Just before Christmas 2025, a bipartisan coalition of U.S. senators, including Lindsey Graham, Dick Durbin, Josh Hawley, Amy Klobuchar, Marsha Blackburn and Ashley Moody, introduced legislation to sun...
www.heritage.org
January 28, 2026 at 7:53 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
jimmymakepeace.bsky.social
They do NOT look like a pickle. Don't tell them that! It was an accident!!!
A small armoured person holding a paddle like staff and wearing a helmet roughly twice as tall as themselves, their armour is greenish.
January 28, 2026 at 2:35 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
nycteris.bsky.social
Old art from when I was good. 🤣
Grey toned bird on a branch
January 28, 2026 at 3:21 PM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
taylorlorenz.bsky.social
"Haidt’s claims of inherent harm are not well-founded, and the policy proposals to ban kids entirely from social media are a bad idea. For older teenage boys, having no social media was associated with *worse* outcomes than having too much of it"
Two Major Studies, 125,000 Kids: The Social Media Panic Doesn’t Hold Up
For years now, we’ve been repeatedly pointing out that the “social media is destroying kids” narrative, popularized by Jonathan Haidt and others, has been built on a foundation of…
www.techdirt.com
January 23, 2026 at 4:16 AM
Reposted by Brainlocki3
evangreer.bsky.social
Here's the Heritage Foundation all-in on repealing Section 230 so that litigious Christian nationalists can dictate the speech rules for the entire Internet

It's so embarrassing so many Dems are falling for this www.teenvogue.com/story/some-d...
Heritage Foundation blog post: A Measure That Would Force Big Tech To Protect Kids Online And Stop Censoring Conservatives
January 28, 2026 at 2:08 PM