Emily Bruce
@brucelab.bsky.social
#NewPI in #RNA #Virology, electron microscopy aficionado, gardener, parent, Assistant Professor
@UVMLarnerMed. Prev @Gates_Cambridge scholar
@UVMLarnerMed. Prev @Gates_Cambridge scholar
I’ve bought from this company many times and never been charged this before. And while you are right, they take a cut in “brokerage fees” , they can’t do that if there is no tarriff to begin with. It’s fundamental a problem caused by the arbitrary tarriff policy which is costing a whole lot of $$
December 1, 2025 at 6:37 PM
I’ve bought from this company many times and never been charged this before. And while you are right, they take a cut in “brokerage fees” , they can’t do that if there is no tarriff to begin with. It’s fundamental a problem caused by the arbitrary tarriff policy which is costing a whole lot of $$
Do you know if people who were eligible for the original deadline based on time limited circumstances (ESI, etc) will still be ok to submit those grants to the newly delayed date (even if they no longer have ESI/meet fellowship years experience limits)?
November 14, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Do you know if people who were eligible for the original deadline based on time limited circumstances (ESI, etc) will still be ok to submit those grants to the newly delayed date (even if they no longer have ESI/meet fellowship years experience limits)?
As an applicant, 40% to 27% to 54%. 40 to 26 (funded) to 54. This kind of data in aggregate is not public as far as I know though I would be shocked if it doesn’t show this pattern (at least in my field).
November 14, 2025 at 12:01 AM
As an applicant, 40% to 27% to 54%. 40 to 26 (funded) to 54. This kind of data in aggregate is not public as far as I know though I would be shocked if it doesn’t show this pattern (at least in my field).
It has an impact because A1 applications that were scored reasonably and are very responsive do better than brand new A0s. For applicants whose reputation is not as established this helps- limiting discussion to top 30% decreases this opportunity.
November 13, 2025 at 11:50 PM
It has an impact because A1 applications that were scored reasonably and are very responsive do better than brand new A0s. For applicants whose reputation is not as established this helps- limiting discussion to top 30% decreases this opportunity.