Braeden 🎣🦀🌲🦅
@bvd100.bsky.social
Natural resource econ, outdoor recreation, conservation by day. Urbanism, Zags, Seattle things the rest of the time. Personal account, views my own.
@seattledot.bsky.social If a project was on the 2025 plan and didn’t happen, and is also not on the 2026 plan, should we assume it is still in the hopper or should we assume its been cancelled?
February 2, 2026 at 4:47 PM
@seattledot.bsky.social If a project was on the 2025 plan and didn’t happen, and is also not on the 2026 plan, should we assume it is still in the hopper or should we assume its been cancelled?
Ok but how about we pay for it with sustainable revenue and not one-time bonds?
February 2, 2026 at 2:35 AM
Ok but how about we pay for it with sustainable revenue and not one-time bonds?
Reposted by Braeden 🎣🦀🌲🦅
Change in Abstract
February 2, 2026 at 1:00 AM
Change in Abstract
In the same sentence, they said the only reason there was so much appreciation was they were lucky to buy in Seattle in the 80s. Which sure sounds like a good reason to tax that appreciation a whole bunch. By their own admission they didn’t earn it!
February 2, 2026 at 12:36 AM
In the same sentence, they said the only reason there was so much appreciation was they were lucky to buy in Seattle in the 80s. Which sure sounds like a good reason to tax that appreciation a whole bunch. By their own admission they didn’t earn it!
A friend of a friend was complaining about the estate tax in WA and how unfair it is their parents would have to pay so much taxes on the appreciation on their Seattle properties (plural).
February 2, 2026 at 12:36 AM
A friend of a friend was complaining about the estate tax in WA and how unfair it is their parents would have to pay so much taxes on the appreciation on their Seattle properties (plural).