Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
@cccr.bsky.social
680 followers 290 following 79 posts
CCCR is an interdisciplinary research center at UW-Madison that aims to understand public opinion & the broad political communication ecology of WI & beyond through social science methods. Engaged scholarship, rooted in democracy. https://cccr.wisc.edu
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
jayrosen.bsky.social
Here's something I post from time to time. My answer to a reader who asked me: what could journalists do NOW to break with some of their more corrosive habits.
Here is a list I post from time to time. My answer to a reader who asked me: what could journalists do NOW to break with some of their more corrosive habits.

Defense of democracy seen as basic to the job.

Symmetrical accounts of asymmetrical realities seen as malpractice.

“Politics as strategic game” frame seen as low quality, downmarket, amateurish— and overmatched.

Bad actors with a history of misinforming the public seen as unsuitable sources and unwelcome guests.

Internalizing of the “liberal bias” critique seen as self-crippling, a historic mistake in need of correction.
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
dcinbox.bsky.social
The full write up is here:

Was It Something The Democrats Said?
A Response to Third Way’s Political Language Memo

open.substack.com/pub/dcinboxi...
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
sifill.bsky.social
The only thing I can say about this paragraph is read it. Sit with it. Read it again. @michaelharriot.bsky.social
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
joshshepperd.bsky.social
I'm closely interviewed for this Nieman Lab report that discusses how rural areas will be affected by loss of funding for local NPR reporting. We must not underestimate the importance of equal access to information - we're about to witness a seismic ideological shift in American sense of "place."
With Cuts to Federal Funding, How Will Public Media in the U.S. Survive? - Nieman Reports
With cuts to federal funding, how will public media in the U.S. survive? Gabe Bullard writes, "The closure of the CPB will hurt NPR and PBS, but the most immediate and devastating blow will be to the ...
niemanreports.org
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
us.theconversation.com
We just learned we are the most visited nonprofit news site in the U.S.
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
rasmuskleis.bsky.social
How effective are user corrections on social media, and does adding a link to a fact check improve effectiveness?

In piece led by @sachaltay.bsky.social we find corrections have small effects, adding a fact-check unlikely to make them more effective misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/the-... 1/6
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
funranium.bsky.social
[deep sigh]

I legitimately wonder where the senior managers pushing LLM tools get the notion that they will save time. Personal experience says it's the equivalent of double checking the work of a particularly incompetent work-study student.

Such is management disconnect from the work being done.
factpostnews.bsky.social
Reporter: The FDA has a new AI tool that's intended to speed up drug approvals. But several FDA employees say the new AI helper is making up studies that do not exist. One FDA employee telling us, 'Anything that you don't have time to double check is unreliable. It hallucinates confidently'
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
lauragarbes.bsky.social
Copy of my book just arrived in the mail today! Feels unreal. You can preorder it here: press.princeton.edu/books/paperb...
A book cover with title “Listeners Like Who? Exclusion and Resistance in the Public Radio Industry”
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
celesteheadlee.bsky.social
When NPR left Twitter, traffic dropped by only a single percentage point.

niemanreports.org/npr-twitter-...
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
theatlantic.com
Although “people in China are acutely conscious of the limits of permissible speech,” Lavender Au writes, Chinese students living in the United States never expected to be contending with similar worries:
For Chinese Students, America Feels Just Like Home
But not in a good way.
bit.ly
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
daviddarmofal.bsky.social
Note that Trump's cuts to university research are his least supported policy, @mayasen.bsky.social. Suggests a potentially broad coalition in support of university research, if universities can effectively make this argument.
Reposted by Center for Communication & Civic Renewal
prowag.bsky.social
Enjoy our report from wave 2 of our three wave election panel study. This report highlights the importance of information diets and the country’s preferences in this current moment. Stay tuned for wave 3 at the end of summer!
cccr.bsky.social
🚨 CCCR has a new survey report out today! 🚨

"100 Days Under Trump: Public Reactions to Attacks on American Governance & Institutions"

The report draws on our Apr/May YouGov panel survey of US adults, following our Oct 2024 survey w/ recontacts + a sample refresh. 1/
cccr.wisc.edu/wp-content/u...
CCCR logo, 100 Days Under Trump: Public Reactions to Attacks on American Governance & Institutions
cccr.bsky.social
And here are some of the methods details for whomever is interested. 👋 /end
About the 2024-25 Wisconsin Communication & Election Study
The 2024-25 Wisconsin Communication & Election Study is a multi-wave survey panel administered online by YouGov. Wave 1 was fielded before the presidential election from October 17 to November 4, 2024. Wave 2 – the focus in this report – was fielded in April and May of 2025 with reinterviews of Wave 1 participants plus a supplemental fresh cross-section. Wave 3 will be fielded in Fall 2025. We also fielded a Midwestern regional survey with many of the same questions.
In Wave 1, YouGov supplied a demographically weighted representative opt-in sample of 2,000 American residents. For Wave 2, we successfully reinterviewed 52% of Wave 1 national participants. We apply demography-based survey sample weights to better align estimates with state populations. 
Although non-probability samples do not have traditional margins of error, percentages from the full sample have a virtual margin of error of +/- 2 percentage points for estimates near 50%, with smaller margins for estimates as they move toward 0% or 100%. Estimates for Democrats in the two states have margins of error of +/- 3 percentage points, and estimates for Republicans are +/- 3 percentage points. 
YouGov interviewed 3486 respondents, including a main sample of 2400 nationally representative respondents (1028 recontacted from Wave 1), and 4 oversamples composed of 253 in Iowa (167 recontacted), 270 in Michigan (178 recontacted), 269 in Minnesota (177 recontacted), and 294 in Wisconsin (225 recontacted). The main sample was then matched down to a sample of 2000, having included all 1028 recontacts. The respondents were matched to a sampling frame on gender, age, race, education, and party ID. The sampling frame is a politically representative "modeled frame" of US adults.
cccr.bsky.social
Read more details in the full report here!

We'll be doing much more analysis with these data, and we'll have another panel survey wave in November.

Stay tuned! 12/
cccr.wisc.edu/wp-content/u...
cccr.wisc.edu
cccr.bsky.social
Trust also varied among Reps by media use. Police & Trump trust is higher among RW-only Reps. Trust in colleges, college grads, unions, & big corps is higher for MSM Reps. Institutional trust is highest for RW+MSM. Distrust of undocumented across all media groups. 11/
Chart: Rep trust in institutions by media use

See text for description.
cccr.bsky.social
Media use differentiated economic & personal finance perceptions among Reps, w/ RW only Reps engaged in greater partisan perceptual biases than other Reps. 10/
Nat'l econ views for Reps by media use. See text for description. Chart: Rep reports on personal finances by media use. See text for description.
cccr.bsky.social
Finally, we looked at all these views among Reps, whose views varied dramatically by media use -- regular RW media use only (18%) vs mainstream only (23%) vs. both (20%) vs. minimal (39%).

RW media Reps were *more* aware of major Trump actions & more supportive than MSM & min. 9/
Rep awareness of Trump actions (chart)

Range from 73% to 91%, gaps by media use up to 40 pts. Chart: Rep support for Trump's actions

Big gaps by media use up to 40 pts
cccr.bsky.social
Public trust in institutions & groups was low overall, but with high variance by party depending on the target, incl for universities & colleges. Highest overall for military, lowest for Congress & big corporations, even among Reps.

Average trust levels were largely unchanged since Oct 2024. 8/
Chart: trust in institutions & groups

Lowest for big corps & Congress, highest for military Big party gaps on many but widespread distrust of big corps & Congress. Chart: change in institutional trust, ranging from -3 to +6