Conor Sewell
@ccsewell.bsky.social
690 followers 400 following 860 posts
Associate Director at Flint Global. Macro, financial services, digital assets. Views my own. Ex-BoE, Treasury. Labour member, big on sports, rugby referee. Bi and autistic.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ccsewell.bsky.social
The Financial Policy Committee on AI:

"Equity market valuations appear stretched, particularly for technology companies focused on AI. This, when combined with increasing concentration... leaves equity markets particularly exposed should expectations around the impact of AI become less optimistic."
ccsewell.bsky.social
Also that - both are good!
ccsewell.bsky.social
The India trip is an interesting test of whether Starmer’s number one priority really is growth, as he often claims.

If it is, an agreement on more visas for skilled workers and students would be a no-brainer.

(Although the government seems to enjoy pretending immigration is unrelated to growth…)
Reposted by Conor Sewell
jamesrball.com
Labour’s core voter is a Londoner. There’s no realistic route to staying in power in London. It’s the heartland.

And yet Labour has kicked London around rhetorically, through policy, and financially since taking office – and now it faces implosion. www.thenewworld.co.uk/james-ball-l...
Labour’s London problem
The party cannot stay in power without dominating in the capital – party insiders are now worried the city is about to slip from the government’s grasp
www.thenewworld.co.uk
ccsewell.bsky.social
I once went to a deeply nerdy two hour seminar on optimal auction design for central counterparties that was significantly better attended than this
ccsewell.bsky.social
I’m now genuinely wondering how much police time is wasted each year because officers refuse to learn how to do things like this efficiently…
paulclarke.com
This is a @jamesrball.com point, but this lunatic on the radio is saying it takes ten hours of CCTV watching to find the point at which a crime happened. Could someone show him (the copper, not James) it's possible to move to different points, and what "binary search" means? #r4today
ccsewell.bsky.social
This isn’t an opinion. There is no factual way to do it otherwise (those five departments make up over 2/3rds of the civil service).

Which of those do the Tories think are so over-staffed they can take massive staff cuts?

The justice system? The military? HMRC? Border control? Job centres?
ccsewell.bsky.social
This is so fundamentally unserious in so many levels.

Apart from anything else, let’s take “cut the civil service back to 2016 levels”. That requires massive cuts to frontline staff in multiple of the following:

- HMRC
- MoJ
- MoD
- DWP
- Home Office
oldtrotter.bsky.social
The Tory Party has gone mad..
He insisted the Conservatives had a plan to cut spending, including £8bn of annual savings from reducing the civil service, £6.9bn from cutting the aid budget and £23bn from slashing the welfare bill.

Stride told the BBC that to save money, only UK citizens would have access to the welfare system and that people with "low-level" mental health problems would also lose access to benefits.

Asked what would happen to people living legally in Britain who are not UK citizens if they fall into hardship, he said: "They've come from other parts of the world and they would have the option to return."

The Conservatives failed to back the Labour government's proposed £5bn of welfare savings this year. Stride claimed that the Labour plans were rushed and "not considered and principled".
ccsewell.bsky.social
I cannot imagine a single real world commercial use case for a spreadsheet where things going wrong more than two times in every five would be fine
ccsewell.bsky.social
A fascinating and terrifying example of how quickly far-right influencers are radicalising themselves with the help of social media.

Matt Goodwin now disagrees with… the Matt Goodwin of seven months ago.
sundersays.bsky.social
He had a different view in March 2025 - that Rishi Sunak and Ash Sarkar (and Shabana Mahmood, Sadiq Khan, Paul Ince, Marcus Rashford, Moeen Ali) COULD identify as English in terms of nationality, while not being part of the white English ethnic group as well.
ccsewell.bsky.social
There is something uniquely cringey about those on the British right (see also Liz Truss) who try to leap on the US-style online grift machine and completely fail to stick the landing
jamesomalley.co.uk
This is very petty to point out but I think The Abundance Agenda is probably doing better numbers than Harry Cole's big, expensive new show.
ccsewell.bsky.social
This is a great piece.

I wish I could ram this image in the face of every single Labour strategist.

The way Labour gets back to 30+% of the vote and defeats Reform is by reassembling its shattered left of centre coalition - not by chasing Reform voters who will never vote for them.
Chart from article
Reposted by Conor Sewell
benansell.bsky.social
On the morning of Keir Starmer's conference speech here's a new post on an odd psychopathology in British politics - our main parties don't like the people who vote for them - the dreaded Professional Managerial Class. And so they are acting out like a divorced dad seeking cooler voters. 1/n
British Politics' Midlife Crisis
Why British Parties Can't Make Peace with Their Actual Voters
benansell.substack.com
Reposted by Conor Sewell
colmpm.bsky.social
These are particularly critical points that should be much better understood, not just by the government but also by political commentators, journalists, and broadcast bookers.
ccsewell.bsky.social
For god’s sake autocorrect, I am not talking about the property of a guy named Fabian
ccsewell.bsky.social
Of all the Labour-related groups to be labelled as a “radical left cabal”, the Fabian’s have to be the funniest.

Anyone agreeing with this should be laughed out of public life.
oldtrotter.bsky.social
In case, like me, you were wondering about the “Fabian thing”
ccsewell.bsky.social
One thing that has struck me is, for all the boasting from Starmer’s team about how they were selecting hundreds of loyal “Starmtroopers”, they cannot overcome the age-old problem that people will pretend to be whatever they need to in order to get selected as a candidate…
duncanrobinson.bsky.social
Male loneliness epidemic: Downing Street edition www.economist.com/britain/2025...
Reposted by Conor Sewell
robfordmancs.bsky.social
Good to see this important research getting a wider audience. Hope Labour advisors listen and learn
ccsewell.bsky.social
Actually, it’s a long way below - see:

bsky.app/profile/ccse...
ccsewell.bsky.social
There’s some significant divergence across pollsters, but they all show the same trend.

Taking the latest YouGov, Opinium and More In Common (all from September) and averaging:

Starmer: 20% favourable, 63% unfavourable, net -43%

Farage: 32% favourable, 48% unfavourable, net -16%
ccsewell.bsky.social
There’s some significant divergence across pollsters, but they all show the same trend.

Taking the latest YouGov, Opinium and More In Common (all from September) and averaging:

Starmer: 20% favourable, 63% unfavourable, net -43%

Farage: 32% favourable, 48% unfavourable, net -16%
ccsewell.bsky.social
A supplementary point on this.

One thing a lot of apologists for Labour’s current strategy seem to be overlooking/not aware of is that Starmer is much, *much* more unpopular than Nigel Farage.

“Vote for me or he gets in” doesn’t really work if people hate you even more!
ccsewell.bsky.social
Meta point - for Labour’s polling to recover, one of three things needs to happen:

1. Starmer is replaced
2. His favourables recover in a way that no UK politician ever has from this low a starting point
3. Labour get an unprecedentedly high vote share for a leader with such low favourables
ccsewell.bsky.social
In 2024, 69% of the vote went to Labour, Greens, and the British-Palestinian independent candidate.

That collapsing to 53%, with the remainder going to Reform/the Tories, seems… unlikely given the demographics of the area.
ccsewell.bsky.social
Beyond other issues, this MRP has a serious issue with specific seats where local independents are strong.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Labour lose Ilford North. But if they do, the numbers do not look like that.

And the number of seats where independents are important is only likely to rise.
yougov.co.uk
YouGov's MRP projects that cabinet ministers including Yvette Cooper and Ed Miliband would lose their seats to Reform UK were an election held tomorrow, with close races for Rachel Reeves and Wes Streeting

Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick are also in extremely close fights to keep their seats
ccsewell.bsky.social
Or, if you’re feeling generous, one final option:

4. The Tories recover to the exact perfect level where they and Reform split the right wing vote with such precision as to allow Labour to win (the margin of error on this is basically zero with Labour’s current numbers)