Chris
@chaotichypno.com
🔞 | NSFW | 30s, He/him | Hypnotist/Mad Scientist
Taking over the world, one brainwashed good girl at a time.
Support:
https://chaotichypno.com/about
Taking over the world, one brainwashed good girl at a time.
Support:
https://chaotichypno.com/about
The (now ancient) Original: www.chaotichypno.com/follow-and-o...
Follow and Obey (2-1) | ChaoticHypnosis
Summary: This script exploits the idea of eye movement in order to induce a trance. It is best read on a full size screen, rather than a mobile device, for that reason. The phrase involved is embedded...
www.chaotichypno.com
January 14, 2026 at 5:29 AM
The (now ancient) Original: www.chaotichypno.com/follow-and-o...
Reposted by Chris
We need to fight these “child online safety” mass surveillance laws with everything we have and fight to protect section 230 which protects ALL of our speech online. Go to badinternetbills.com for more info!!
January 13, 2026 at 3:19 PM
We need to fight these “child online safety” mass surveillance laws with everything we have and fight to protect section 230 which protects ALL of our speech online. Go to badinternetbills.com for more info!!
Reposted by Chris
It’s crucial to recognize this is not hypocrisy. People in power don’t actually want to regulate the business models of these big tech companies, they want to use liberals/leftists rightful anger at big tech to pass sweeping surveillance/censorship laws while letting these companies profit
January 13, 2026 at 3:17 PM
It’s crucial to recognize this is not hypocrisy. People in power don’t actually want to regulate the business models of these big tech companies, they want to use liberals/leftists rightful anger at big tech to pass sweeping surveillance/censorship laws while letting these companies profit
Ergo, trance is a fish.
[Omitting quite a lot for brevity and so I can maybe revisit this later in more depth, but I wanted to get the thoughts down somewhere.]
Anyway, now introducing a new and innovative induction style, the Trout Slap™
...carry on.
[Omitting quite a lot for brevity and so I can maybe revisit this later in more depth, but I wanted to get the thoughts down somewhere.]
Anyway, now introducing a new and innovative induction style, the Trout Slap™
...carry on.
January 11, 2026 at 4:10 AM
Ergo, trance is a fish.
[Omitting quite a lot for brevity and so I can maybe revisit this later in more depth, but I wanted to get the thoughts down somewhere.]
Anyway, now introducing a new and innovative induction style, the Trout Slap™
...carry on.
[Omitting quite a lot for brevity and so I can maybe revisit this later in more depth, but I wanted to get the thoughts down somewhere.]
Anyway, now introducing a new and innovative induction style, the Trout Slap™
...carry on.
So if trance can exist without hypnosis, can hypnosis exist without trance?
I'd argue yes, but now we're in very nebulous territory and losing focus (lol)
In short, it makes sense in most framings to allow trance to be both state, for simpler differentiation, and non-state, for accurate expansion.
I'd argue yes, but now we're in very nebulous territory and losing focus (lol)
In short, it makes sense in most framings to allow trance to be both state, for simpler differentiation, and non-state, for accurate expansion.
January 11, 2026 at 4:10 AM
So if trance can exist without hypnosis, can hypnosis exist without trance?
I'd argue yes, but now we're in very nebulous territory and losing focus (lol)
In short, it makes sense in most framings to allow trance to be both state, for simpler differentiation, and non-state, for accurate expansion.
I'd argue yes, but now we're in very nebulous territory and losing focus (lol)
In short, it makes sense in most framings to allow trance to be both state, for simpler differentiation, and non-state, for accurate expansion.
Which is to say nothing about trances that aren't (natively) hypnotic, but are still trance - think flow state for creatives, hyperfocus, meditation, particularly intense exercise of imagination.
Are those less "trance" because they weren't hypnotically induced? Of course not.
Are those less "trance" because they weren't hypnotically induced? Of course not.
January 11, 2026 at 4:10 AM
Which is to say nothing about trances that aren't (natively) hypnotic, but are still trance - think flow state for creatives, hyperfocus, meditation, particularly intense exercise of imagination.
Are those less "trance" because they weren't hypnotically induced? Of course not.
Are those less "trance" because they weren't hypnotically induced? Of course not.
Trance shares this problem.
It's useful, both linguistically and conceptually, to discuss it as a discrete state...but an enormous amount of hypnotic suggestion operates outside of said state - both before, in the setting of expectation, and after, in the exploitation of post-altered state.
It's useful, both linguistically and conceptually, to discuss it as a discrete state...but an enormous amount of hypnotic suggestion operates outside of said state - both before, in the setting of expectation, and after, in the exploitation of post-altered state.
January 11, 2026 at 4:10 AM
Trance shares this problem.
It's useful, both linguistically and conceptually, to discuss it as a discrete state...but an enormous amount of hypnotic suggestion operates outside of said state - both before, in the setting of expectation, and after, in the exploitation of post-altered state.
It's useful, both linguistically and conceptually, to discuss it as a discrete state...but an enormous amount of hypnotic suggestion operates outside of said state - both before, in the setting of expectation, and after, in the exploitation of post-altered state.
That is, there is no category of creatures that can be created to include everything we understand to be fish without either a) excluding things we know to be fish or b) including things we know are *not* fish.
There is a similar problem with trees, but "trance is a tree" isn't as fun a statement.
There is a similar problem with trees, but "trance is a tree" isn't as fun a statement.
January 11, 2026 at 4:10 AM
That is, there is no category of creatures that can be created to include everything we understand to be fish without either a) excluding things we know to be fish or b) including things we know are *not* fish.
There is a similar problem with trees, but "trance is a tree" isn't as fun a statement.
There is a similar problem with trees, but "trance is a tree" isn't as fun a statement.
Bear with me.
We, as hypnokinksters, will do as bears do, and try to catch this particular fish together.
Some of you may know where this is going.
"Fish" is a word with a relatively intuitive meaning to most people - linguistically very useful.
But biologically? There is no such thing as a fish.
We, as hypnokinksters, will do as bears do, and try to catch this particular fish together.
Some of you may know where this is going.
"Fish" is a word with a relatively intuitive meaning to most people - linguistically very useful.
But biologically? There is no such thing as a fish.
January 11, 2026 at 4:10 AM
Bear with me.
We, as hypnokinksters, will do as bears do, and try to catch this particular fish together.
Some of you may know where this is going.
"Fish" is a word with a relatively intuitive meaning to most people - linguistically very useful.
But biologically? There is no such thing as a fish.
We, as hypnokinksters, will do as bears do, and try to catch this particular fish together.
Some of you may know where this is going.
"Fish" is a word with a relatively intuitive meaning to most people - linguistically very useful.
But biologically? There is no such thing as a fish.