chasingmicrobes
@chasingmicrobes.bsky.social
All posting done on personal time, using personal device, and only reflect my personal opinions.
Reposted by chasingmicrobes
Every time someone gives in, it makes it that much easier for Trump & his goons to move on to the next target. It also normalizes the extortion. So good for Powell, and boo to those who have "made deals" in a misguided effort to move on (as though giving in will stop the bully). 2/2
January 12, 2026 at 1:27 AM
Every time someone gives in, it makes it that much easier for Trump & his goons to move on to the next target. It also normalizes the extortion. So good for Powell, and boo to those who have "made deals" in a misguided effort to move on (as though giving in will stop the bully). 2/2
2/2
NIH approved my company's latest drawdown the day after submission. It's been stalled at the new defendthespend step for days. These delays that didn't exist before 2025 make it unnecessarily difficult to run a startup off SBIR while complying with CFR.
NIH approved my company's latest drawdown the day after submission. It's been stalled at the new defendthespend step for days. These delays that didn't exist before 2025 make it unnecessarily difficult to run a startup off SBIR while complying with CFR.
January 10, 2026 at 12:33 PM
2/2
NIH approved my company's latest drawdown the day after submission. It's been stalled at the new defendthespend step for days. These delays that didn't exist before 2025 make it unnecessarily difficult to run a startup off SBIR while complying with CFR.
NIH approved my company's latest drawdown the day after submission. It's been stalled at the new defendthespend step for days. These delays that didn't exist before 2025 make it unnecessarily difficult to run a startup off SBIR while complying with CFR.
Second quote from:
www.vox.com/2016/10/7/13...
www.vox.com/2016/10/7/13...
”Grab ’em by the pussy”: how Trump talked about women in private is horrifying
A secret recording from 2005 makes it clear.
www.vox.com
January 8, 2026 at 10:43 PM
Second quote from:
www.vox.com/2016/10/7/13...
www.vox.com/2016/10/7/13...
Reposted by chasingmicrobes
One of the obvious concerns about the administration's killing spree at sea was that if the US government would lawlessly kill people on the high seas just because the administration spuriously labeled them as "terrorists", it might do so elsewhere—including in the United States.
January 7, 2026 at 7:40 PM
One of the obvious concerns about the administration's killing spree at sea was that if the US government would lawlessly kill people on the high seas just because the administration spuriously labeled them as "terrorists", it might do so elsewhere—including in the United States.