Follow him: https://x.com/cirnosad
Reposted with permission.
[Account run by @kiritonervegear.bsky.social]
The most dangerous form of deception is inception. The type you are not even aware of and take for granted so deeply that it forms the very lens in which you see the entire world.
[VIDEO]
files.catbox.moe/gwncj3.mp4
[VIDEO]
files.catbox.moe/gwncj3.mp4
Truly a one of a kind, and a very private dignified man who lived as a hidden gem. I'll write a thread on him in the future.
Don't believe his lies.
Schwinger was based.
Feynman was soy.
Truly a one of a kind, and a very private dignified man who lived as a hidden gem. I'll write a thread on him in the future.
Don't believe his lies.
Schwinger was based.
Feynman was soy.
Don't believe his lies.
Schwinger was based.
Feynman was soy.
Added to thread, sneak peak since it's taking so long.
[VIDEO]
files.catbox.moe/c8mjz6.mp4
Added to thread, sneak peak since it's taking so long.
[VIDEO]
files.catbox.moe/c8mjz6.mp4
Top news: Israel tells on itself, let's loose on MRRs. They're not "pure fusion" weapons, they just have a very low radiation signature.
They're only saying this because they left an undetonated MRR in Lebanon after assassinating another of its leaders.
Top news: Israel tells on itself, let's loose on MRRs. They're not "pure fusion" weapons, they just have a very low radiation signature.
They're only saying this because they left an undetonated MRR in Lebanon after assassinating another of its leaders.
files.catbox.moe/qxnypf.pdf
files.catbox.moe/qxnypf.pdf
Trust me, bet on the latter. I didn't shut up and calculate as Feynman asked me to. I kept going and going and now I can't ever stop.
Trust me, bet on the latter. I didn't shut up and calculate as Feynman asked me to. I kept going and going and now I can't ever stop.
There is only ONE TRUTH, that’s the only guiding light you need. Test your own production against it, and be honest about it, and there will be nothing you cannot accomplish.
There is only ONE TRUTH, that’s the only guiding light you need. Test your own production against it, and be honest about it, and there will be nothing you cannot accomplish.
How strange. Accurate to 0.03%. I don't feel confident enough to include this amazing thing in my paper so I'll share it on here. Has anyone encountered this approximation before?
[My head hurts and I want to finish this thing. I'm sorry I tried my best.]
How strange. Accurate to 0.03%. I don't feel confident enough to include this amazing thing in my paper so I'll share it on here. Has anyone encountered this approximation before?
[My head hurts and I want to finish this thing. I'm sorry I tried my best.]
It killed an MIT professor.
This is for you Nuno, even though I refrain from adopting any topology to keep my result as general as possible.
It killed an MIT professor.
This is for you Nuno, even though I refrain from adopting any topology to keep my result as general as possible.
It's a complete restructuring of everything everyone already knows and that alone will blow the minds of those with an inquisitive nature.
It's a complete restructuring of everything everyone already knows and that alone will blow the minds of those with an inquisitive nature.
It has escalated.
Now I have an equation that can determine the combined effect of the geometry and non-linearity of an electron containment field.
Plug gamma = 1.615 from the NLSE soliton (solved numerically in 1970) and you get within 1.2% of the fine structure constant.
It has escalated.
Now I have an equation that can determine the combined effect of the geometry and non-linearity of an electron containment field.
Plug gamma = 1.615 from the NLSE soliton (solved numerically in 1970) and you get within 1.2% of the fine structure constant.
He was very very close to discovering event X, realised there was a period
files.catbox.moe/ic40es.mp4
He was very very close to discovering event X, realised there was a period
History is made: Fine structure mystery solved? /🧵
My model may have solved an outstanding question in physics: the origin of the fine structure constant. I found a robust source and it works even with some tuning within -3% to 7% over a massive range of non-linear fields.
History is made: Fine structure mystery solved? /🧵
My model may have solved an outstanding question in physics: the origin of the fine structure constant. I found a robust source and it works even with some tuning within -3% to 7% over a massive range of non-linear fields.
History is made: Fine structure mystery solved? /🧵
My model may have solved an outstanding question in physics: the origin of the fine structure constant. I found a robust source and it works even with some tuning within -3% to 7% over a massive range of non-linear fields.
Literal apocalypse happening in my head rn.
Felt a slip in confidence with my calculation that I had pre-committed and then this happened.
Literal apocalypse happening in my head rn.
Felt a slip in confidence with my calculation that I had pre-committed and then this happened.
Posting this just in case as pre-commitment. Will be sharing with trusted peers before publishing. Once it's out it the genie is never going back into its bottle.
Posting this just in case as pre-commitment. Will be sharing with trusted peers before publishing. Once it's out it the genie is never going back into its bottle.
Well, you know I'm writing about it, so it's inevitably going to be about nuclear weapons.
Well, you know I'm writing about it, so it's inevitably going to be about nuclear weapons.