Korobochka 💎 mirror
@cirnosad.bsky.social
Mirroring cirnosad's best posts/threads.
Follow him: https://x.com/cirnosad
Reposted with permission.
[Account run by @kiritonervegear.bsky.social]
Follow him: https://x.com/cirnosad
Reposted with permission.
[Account run by @kiritonervegear.bsky.social]
[UTC 4:09 PM · Jan 11, 2026]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...
x.com/cirnosad/sta...
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
[UTC 4:09 PM · Jan 11, 2026]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...
x.com/cirnosad/sta...
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
---
* Often called "soyience".
** See the problem of irreducible complexity and the vigorous and often times nonsensical debate surrounding it, e.g. 2
Please note: If you are already familiar with QM, please skip this 'popular science' thread and read my paper directly: [1].
* Often called "soyience".
** See the problem of irreducible complexity and the vigorous and often times nonsensical debate surrounding it, e.g. 2
Please note: If you are already familiar with QM, please skip this 'popular science' thread and read my paper directly: [1].
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
---
* Often called "soyience".
** See the problem of irreducible complexity and the vigorous and often times nonsensical debate surrounding it, e.g. 2
Please note: If you are already familiar with QM, please skip this 'popular science' thread and read my paper directly: [1].
* Often called "soyience".
** See the problem of irreducible complexity and the vigorous and often times nonsensical debate surrounding it, e.g. 2
Please note: If you are already familiar with QM, please skip this 'popular science' thread and read my paper directly: [1].
Part F: Reinterpretation of foundational experiments
Part G: Social implications and conclusion.
Let's begin with what QM is... or, let's say, why we needed to create it at all in the first place! Each part will be a reply to this thread so stay tuned as I write it out.
Part G: Social implications and conclusion.
Let's begin with what QM is... or, let's say, why we needed to create it at all in the first place! Each part will be a reply to this thread so stay tuned as I write it out.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
Part F: Reinterpretation of foundational experiments
Part G: Social implications and conclusion.
Let's begin with what QM is... or, let's say, why we needed to create it at all in the first place! Each part will be a reply to this thread so stay tuned as I write it out.
Part G: Social implications and conclusion.
Let's begin with what QM is... or, let's say, why we needed to create it at all in the first place! Each part will be a reply to this thread so stay tuned as I write it out.
…Poincaré left off with the most parsimonious possible derivation of non-interacting QM, relating matter's frequency and energy thus dispersion relation.
Part E: Connecting matter with the field, deriving the Schrödinger equation from scratch.
Part E: Connecting matter with the field, deriving the Schrödinger equation from scratch.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…Poincaré left off with the most parsimonious possible derivation of non-interacting QM, relating matter's frequency and energy thus dispersion relation.
Part E: Connecting matter with the field, deriving the Schrödinger equation from scratch.
Part E: Connecting matter with the field, deriving the Schrödinger equation from scratch.
…is taught and what we aim to fix. Measurements in intensity, frequency and energy.
Part C: Poincaré's tour de force, E=mc^2, inventing relativity, deriving electromagnetism from conservation laws and Lorentz invariance and his final word on matter being a field disturbance
Part D: Picking up where…
Part C: Poincaré's tour de force, E=mc^2, inventing relativity, deriving electromagnetism from conservation laws and Lorentz invariance and his final word on matter being a field disturbance
Part D: Picking up where…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…is taught and what we aim to fix. Measurements in intensity, frequency and energy.
Part C: Poincaré's tour de force, E=mc^2, inventing relativity, deriving electromagnetism from conservation laws and Lorentz invariance and his final word on matter being a field disturbance
Part D: Picking up where…
Part C: Poincaré's tour de force, E=mc^2, inventing relativity, deriving electromagnetism from conservation laws and Lorentz invariance and his final word on matter being a field disturbance
Part D: Picking up where…
…this material.
This is going to be a long one, and I'm going to be writing it out live, so for your sake and mine, here is my planned outline of this thread:
Part A: Origin of QM through 200 years of scientific observations and why it was needed at all
Part B: What is wrong about how QM…
This is going to be a long one, and I'm going to be writing it out live, so for your sake and mine, here is my planned outline of this thread:
Part A: Origin of QM through 200 years of scientific observations and why it was needed at all
Part B: What is wrong about how QM…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…this material.
This is going to be a long one, and I'm going to be writing it out live, so for your sake and mine, here is my planned outline of this thread:
Part A: Origin of QM through 200 years of scientific observations and why it was needed at all
Part B: What is wrong about how QM…
This is going to be a long one, and I'm going to be writing it out live, so for your sake and mine, here is my planned outline of this thread:
Part A: Origin of QM through 200 years of scientific observations and why it was needed at all
Part B: What is wrong about how QM…
…of courses, not a short Twitter thread. The majority won't get through it, as it requires a great deal of patience.
Thus, I will take a dual approach. This thread will be a qualitative description of my 104 page paper [1], extended to cover why it should interest those unfamiliar with…
Thus, I will take a dual approach. This thread will be a qualitative description of my 104 page paper [1], extended to cover why it should interest those unfamiliar with…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…of courses, not a short Twitter thread. The majority won't get through it, as it requires a great deal of patience.
Thus, I will take a dual approach. This thread will be a qualitative description of my 104 page paper [1], extended to cover why it should interest those unfamiliar with…
Thus, I will take a dual approach. This thread will be a qualitative description of my 104 page paper [1], extended to cover why it should interest those unfamiliar with…
…and contained twisting facts within it, like the "particle-wave" duality or whatever is covered by high schools/YouTube today. This is a unique challenge for me to overcome, because simply explaining what QM is to the average person as it is written in textbooks, would take an entire set…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…and contained twisting facts within it, like the "particle-wave" duality or whatever is covered by high schools/YouTube today. This is a unique challenge for me to overcome, because simply explaining what QM is to the average person as it is written in textbooks, would take an entire set…
…that lives on top of QM, from microbiology, biology, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, politics and more. The ontology spreads to everything (except of course, gravity -- for now? 😉).
The average person reading this probably doesn't know what QM even is, only that they heard it was "weird"…
The average person reading this probably doesn't know what QM even is, only that they heard it was "weird"…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…that lives on top of QM, from microbiology, biology, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, politics and more. The ontology spreads to everything (except of course, gravity -- for now? 😉).
The average person reading this probably doesn't know what QM even is, only that they heard it was "weird"…
The average person reading this probably doesn't know what QM even is, only that they heard it was "weird"…
I derive the same equations and relationships FROM realism.
The particular implications of that last result is staggering as it represents a return to ontology. As I am striking at the very fabric of what we understand reality to be, all the implications will naturally involve everything…
The particular implications of that last result is staggering as it represents a return to ontology. As I am striking at the very fabric of what we understand reality to be, all the implications will naturally involve everything…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
I derive the same equations and relationships FROM realism.
The particular implications of that last result is staggering as it represents a return to ontology. As I am striking at the very fabric of what we understand reality to be, all the implications will naturally involve everything…
The particular implications of that last result is staggering as it represents a return to ontology. As I am striking at the very fabric of what we understand reality to be, all the implications will naturally involve everything…
I prove that it is a required relation for an electron, without postulation simply a process of elimination. The standard formulation of quantum mechanics requires one to throw away realism, the idea that the physical world exists objectively, independently of our minds or observations.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
I prove that it is a required relation for an electron, without postulation simply a process of elimination. The standard formulation of quantum mechanics requires one to throw away realism, the idea that the physical world exists objectively, independently of our minds or observations.
…cannot be truly understood, and the famous Schrödinger's equation cannot be derived. I disprove this directly in the paper, by deriving it without "non-classical" postulation. All standard treatments claim an energy-frequency relation that is assigned to a mythical object known as a photon.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…cannot be truly understood, and the famous Schrödinger's equation cannot be derived. I disprove this directly in the paper, by deriving it without "non-classical" postulation. All standard treatments claim an energy-frequency relation that is assigned to a mythical object known as a photon.
In order to do so, I had to do something that was considered impossible. This thread will explain what that is, how it was proven, and the implications of this overturning of the pedagogical treatment of QM.
I'll go through just a few examples: Many leading physicists like Feynman claim that QM…
I'll go through just a few examples: Many leading physicists like Feynman claim that QM…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
In order to do so, I had to do something that was considered impossible. This thread will explain what that is, how it was proven, and the implications of this overturning of the pedagogical treatment of QM.
I'll go through just a few examples: Many leading physicists like Feynman claim that QM…
I'll go through just a few examples: Many leading physicists like Feynman claim that QM…
The main problem is this: Those who know QM through coursework, or popular media, have learnt it entirely incorrectly. The pedagogy is completely wrong and I have proven it in my recently published draft Relativistic Soliton Mechanics (2025) [1].
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
The main problem is this: Those who know QM through coursework, or popular media, have learnt it entirely incorrectly. The pedagogy is completely wrong and I have proven it in my recently published draft Relativistic Soliton Mechanics (2025) [1].
These people will go on to influence others indirectly, spreading atheism, nihilism and many ideas with full conviction. After all, in their perspective, the very fabric of reality supports their assertions. As the Hermes school says, as above so below and vice versa.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
These people will go on to influence others indirectly, spreading atheism, nihilism and many ideas with full conviction. After all, in their perspective, the very fabric of reality supports their assertions. As the Hermes school says, as above so below and vice versa.
Another might see the observer effect, the idea that reality changes through any measurement or observation, as overturning the hierarchy of God's omniscience. They would then end up assigning it to themselves instead, in a Cartesian manner.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
Another might see the observer effect, the idea that reality changes through any measurement or observation, as overturning the hierarchy of God's omniscience. They would then end up assigning it to themselves instead, in a Cartesian manner.
For example, someone well versed in it might see the randomness as proof that there's no overall destiny or purpose to life. This leaks out into ardent support for mathematical impossibilities** like gradual/randomly driven Darwinian evolution rather than active adaptation.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
For example, someone well versed in it might see the randomness as proof that there's no overall destiny or purpose to life. This leaks out into ardent support for mathematical impossibilities** like gradual/randomly driven Darwinian evolution rather than active adaptation.
Needless to say, this is absolute nonsense, but these sorts of belief influence people more than religion ever can due to the tangibility of science.
Most people don't get this influence directly however, it is always indirectly through people exposed to QM.
Most people don't get this influence directly however, it is always indirectly through people exposed to QM.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
Needless to say, this is absolute nonsense, but these sorts of belief influence people more than religion ever can due to the tangibility of science.
Most people don't get this influence directly however, it is always indirectly through people exposed to QM.
Most people don't get this influence directly however, it is always indirectly through people exposed to QM.
One idea that hit the mainstream is Quantum Immortality, promoted by the late John McAfee who participated in a game of Russian roulette in front of a journalist to demonstrate that the "timeline" was his and he couldn't die.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
One idea that hit the mainstream is Quantum Immortality, promoted by the late John McAfee who participated in a game of Russian roulette in front of a journalist to demonstrate that the "timeline" was his and he couldn't die.
…observer dynamics and much much more. The current state of Quantum mechanics has captured the mind of anyone who is at least a little bit well read more than anything else in science. The influence has been nihilistic, a disconnected world that seems like a dream of one person.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…observer dynamics and much much more. The current state of Quantum mechanics has captured the mind of anyone who is at least a little bit well read more than anything else in science. The influence has been nihilistic, a disconnected world that seems like a dream of one person.
We cannot reconcile our two theories together, and so at the large end we get contestable ideas like black holes and other nonsense which captures the imagination of society.
Darker still is what we get from our epistemology at the smaller scale: multiverses, intrinsic randomness, solipsistic…
Darker still is what we get from our epistemology at the smaller scale: multiverses, intrinsic randomness, solipsistic…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
We cannot reconcile our two theories together, and so at the large end we get contestable ideas like black holes and other nonsense which captures the imagination of society.
Darker still is what we get from our epistemology at the smaller scale: multiverses, intrinsic randomness, solipsistic…
Darker still is what we get from our epistemology at the smaller scale: multiverses, intrinsic randomness, solipsistic…
The frontier of hard science is the intersection of quantum mechanics (QM) and gravitation. Quantum mechanics describes what things are made of and how they interact with each other, up to even macroscopic scales. Gravitation describes things at cosmic scales.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
The frontier of hard science is the intersection of quantum mechanics (QM) and gravitation. Quantum mechanics describes what things are made of and how they interact with each other, up to even macroscopic scales. Gravitation describes things at cosmic scales.
…was improved with better resolution. Chemistry, electricity, modern optics, astronomy and more.
At some point in time, academics partitioned science into two, the hard sciences and the soft sciences. The hard sciences are the true roots and so this is where my focus will lie.
At some point in time, academics partitioned science into two, the hard sciences and the soft sciences. The hard sciences are the true roots and so this is where my focus will lie.
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
…was improved with better resolution. Chemistry, electricity, modern optics, astronomy and more.
At some point in time, academics partitioned science into two, the hard sciences and the soft sciences. The hard sciences are the true roots and so this is where my focus will lie.
At some point in time, academics partitioned science into two, the hard sciences and the soft sciences. The hard sciences are the true roots and so this is where my focus will lie.
In ancient times all the way until a recent century, it was accepted that the elements were Earth, Fire, Water and Air, and the telos is for each of these elements to end up amongst each other. As the East, West Asia and most significantly, European men advanced science, this understanding…
January 15, 2026 at 4:49 AM
In ancient times all the way until a recent century, it was accepted that the elements were Earth, Fire, Water and Air, and the telos is for each of these elements to end up amongst each other. As the East, West Asia and most significantly, European men advanced science, this understanding…