cnm.bsky.social
@cnm.bsky.social
LOL
January 2, 2026 at 8:37 PM
antitrust is not criminal. There were numerous criminal laws that, e.g., musk broke during the biden era.
January 2, 2026 at 3:25 AM
"How President Trump's Allies Comforted and Supported Him to Better the Country as His Health Waned" By Peter Baker and Maggie Haberman
December 30, 2025 at 5:14 PM
It’s also very silly to think letting depositors lose money would have changed how e.g. David Sachs would have behaved
December 29, 2025 at 5:17 PM
You called it a bailout which it was not! SVB does not exist. It’s a series of assumptions to say that a handful of people were both the cause of failure and reason for resolution.
December 29, 2025 at 5:17 PM
it’s clear you have a fundamental lack of understanding about any of this.
December 29, 2025 at 3:56 PM
People who work at big companies also have families, and many public companies banked there.
December 29, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Company A has one million at SVB. They use it to make biweekly payroll. They pay Alice and Dan. If company A loses 750k, they don’t make payroll. Alice and Dan are harmed even if they don’t bank with SVB.
December 29, 2025 at 3:54 PM
I’m sorry to have to tell you this but tech companies have payroll obligations to individuals, many of whom are moms and dads!
December 29, 2025 at 3:30 PM
many of them were, and even the non-moms-and-dads had moms and dads on their payroll, which was held at SVB.
December 29, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Again, this is factually incorrect. FDIC resolves bank failures in more ways than just guaranteeing depositors to the insurance limits.
December 29, 2025 at 2:14 PM
He used this one ”weird” trick to gain control of the media narrative and he never let it go
December 26, 2025 at 5:55 PM
no you've got it wrong, it was the consultants and the DNC who made him stop. No amount of evidence you show me can change my mind.
December 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Do you have any links to where forests are regularly being cut down to add solar fields? I’d like to read more about that issue.
December 25, 2025 at 5:31 PM
At least as far back as August. So the deal that was "near" is now almost 5 months past.
December 25, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Reposted
This piece is a species of what we might call “born yesterday” coverage that sets aside how these actions fit into the history of Trumpism and authoritarianism. This is reporting in the spirit of what George W. S. Trow called “no-history” in his remarkable essay, “Within the Context of No Context.”
December 25, 2025 at 1:39 PM
hey, thanks for letting us know you haven't been paying attention and have no idea what you're talking about!
December 24, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Also he and nate are bitching about GEM.
December 22, 2025 at 3:00 PM
She likes it. Vance has been like this for a long time, she's a devout rightoid.
December 22, 2025 at 2:16 PM