Connor Keating
@connortkeating.bsky.social
870 followers 97 following 19 posts
Junior Research Fellow at the University of Oxford researching emotion, social cognition, and autism | Co-director of the U21 Autism Research Network | He/him 🏳️‍🌈
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Connor Keating
craeioe.bsky.social
We are delighted that @connortkeating.bsky.social's Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism & Alexithymia #CRAEwebinar is now available to watch on our YouTube Channel.

youtu.be/OqbcUW6qbLw
Webinar image for Connor Keating's Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism & Alexithymia.  Photo of Connor. UCL header. Dated 2nd Oct 2025
Reposted by Connor Keating
craeioe.bsky.social
Our October #CRAEwebinar:
Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism, Alexithymia and Psychological Mechanisms.

@connortkeating.bsky.social will ask, do autistic & non-autistic adults process emotions differently once alexithymia is in the mix?
2nd Oct 4 pm BST

Sign up:
www.eventbrite.co.uk...
Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism & Alexithymia
Connor Keating considers whether emotion-processing differs between autistic and non-autistic adults after controlling for alexithymia.
www.eventbrite.co.uk
Reposted by Connor Keating
biancaaschuster.bsky.social
Very happy to report that this study is now published in Molecular Autism: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
biancaaschuster.bsky.social

Social interactions cannot be assessed without (1) acknowledging the two-way process involved and (2) the cultural context the interactions are embedded in. We present new evidence for this, using stimuli like the one below, in our latest preprint: osf.io/xg7y4 🤝
Reposted by Connor Keating
cjcrompton.bsky.social
New paper alert!

Information transfer within and between autistic and non-autistic people is out today in @nathumbehav.nature.com

nature.com/articles/s41...

THREAD! 🧵⬇️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thanks so much! ☺️☺️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thank you Jade! Hope everything is good with you ☺️☺️
connortkeating.bsky.social
I am incredibly honoured (and shocked) to receive the Best PhD Dissertation Award from INSAR! This work wouldn’t exist without amazing mentors, colleagues, lived experience experts and participants! Special thanks to Jennifer Cook for her incredible mentorship - I am so grateful for all the support!
connortkeating.bsky.social
And huge thanks to all of the people who made this work possible - particularly Jennifer Cook, Sophie Sowden-Carvalho, and the lived experience experts in Birmingham Psychology Autism Research Team! ✨✨✨
connortkeating.bsky.social
I’m so grateful for the opportunity to present my Frith Prize talk at the EPS meeting yesterday — it was such an honour and a delight! I had some fascinating questions and conversations that will definitely help shape my next projects. Huge thanks to @exppsychsoc.bsky.social for the fab conference!
An image of me presenting my talk. On the slide is a thank you to various people that helped make the work possible
Reposted by Connor Keating
biancaaschuster.bsky.social

Social interactions cannot be assessed without (1) acknowledging the two-way process involved and (2) the cultural context the interactions are embedded in. We present new evidence for this, using stimuli like the one below, in our latest preprint: osf.io/xg7y4 🤝
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thanks so much to the autism consultancy groups in Hong Kong, the UK, and the US for your help with our study - we are really grateful for your input.

Reposts to thread really appreciated ❤️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Our findings underscore the crucial need to combat misconceptions about, and stigma towards autism, particularly in Hong Kong🧵6/6
connortkeating.bsky.social
Knowledge and explicit stigma differed across countries, even after accounting for covariates: students in Hong Kong displayed less accurate knowledge, and higher explicit stigma towards autism, than those in the UK and US. Implicit biases did not differ across countries🧵5/6
Boxplots showing that (1) levels of autism-related knowledge was lower in Hong Kong than the UK and the US, and (2) levels of explicit stigma was higher in Hong Kong than the UK and the US, after accounting for covariates at p < .0001.
connortkeating.bsky.social
Implicit biases were directly predicted by age and explicit stigma. They were also indirectly predicted by vertical individualism (positively) and horizontal collectivism (negatively) via explicit stigma. Check out the paper for our speculations on the underlying mechanisms🧵4/6
connortkeating.bsky.social
Explicit stigma was linked to lower knowledge, lower horizontal collectivism (not seeing oneself as part of a group whose members should be equal), higher vertical individualism (seeing oneself as autonomous within a justly hierarchical system), and higher implicit biases🧵3/6
connortkeating.bsky.social
In this study, we aimed to (1) assess the contribution of knowledge and cultural orientation to both explicit stigma and implicit biases, and (2) compare autism-related knowledge, explicit stigma, and implicit biases across university students in Hong Kong, the UK and US 🧵2/6
a close up of a spinning earth with a black background
Alt: a close up of a spinning earth with a black background
media.tenor.com
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thanks so much to the autism consultancy groups in Hong Kong, the UK, and the US for your help with our study - we are really grateful for your input!

Reposts to the thread are really appreciated ❤️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Our findings underscore the crucial need to combat misconceptions about, and stigma towards autism, particularly in Hong Kong🧵6/6
connortkeating.bsky.social
Knowledge and explicit stigma differed across countries, even after accounting for covariates: students in Hong Kong displayed less accurate knowledge, and higher explicit stigma towards autism, than those in the UK and US. Implicit biases did not differ across countries🧵5/6
Boxplots showing that (1) levels of autism-related knowledge was lower in Hong Kong than the UK and the US, and (2) levels of explicit stigma was higher in Hong Kong than the UK and the US, after accounting for covariates at p < .0001.
connortkeating.bsky.social
Implicit biases were directly predicted by age and explicit stigma. They were also indirectly predicted by vertical individualism (positively) and horizontal collectivism (negatively) via explicit stigma. Check out the paper for our speculations on the underlying mechanisms🧵4/6
connortkeating.bsky.social
Explicit stigma was linked to lower knowledge, lower horizontal collectivism (not seeing oneself as part of a group whose members should be equal), higher vertical individualism (seeing oneself as autonomous within a justly hierarchical system), and higher implicit biases🧵3/6