copernicus.bsky.social
@copernicus.bsky.social
A sanctioned oil tanker named Skipper. I've been told it's normal and legal, but I also don't have the background knowledge to verify what I've been told.
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12...
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12...
December 10, 2025 at 10:05 PM
A sanctioned oil tanker named Skipper. I've been told it's normal and legal, but I also don't have the background knowledge to verify what I've been told.
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12...
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12...
December 10, 2025 at 9:40 PM
I'm impressed by people bragging about their inability to do five minutes of research to see if there were any articles written about this.
December 10, 2025 at 5:59 PM
I'm impressed by people bragging about their inability to do five minutes of research to see if there were any articles written about this.
"this is consistent with the type of xenophobic behavior that we've seen from this President, from the administration, from my Republican colleagues instead of focusing on the issues that matter because they have no solutions"
December 3, 2025 at 10:05 PM
"this is consistent with the type of xenophobic behavior that we've seen from this President, from the administration, from my Republican colleagues instead of focusing on the issues that matter because they have no solutions"
It's explicitly not a slogan.
It's a talking point Jeffries uses to segue into talking about opportunity and the need to support social programs.
It's a talking point Jeffries uses to segue into talking about opportunity and the need to support social programs.
November 30, 2025 at 7:11 PM
It's explicitly not a slogan.
It's a talking point Jeffries uses to segue into talking about opportunity and the need to support social programs.
It's a talking point Jeffries uses to segue into talking about opportunity and the need to support social programs.
Here's him saying it in August and October, for example.
jeffries.house.gov/2025/08/24/l...
jeffries.house.gov/2025/10/24/l...
jeffries.house.gov/2025/08/24/l...
jeffries.house.gov/2025/10/24/l...
November 30, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Here's him saying it in August and October, for example.
jeffries.house.gov/2025/08/24/l...
jeffries.house.gov/2025/10/24/l...
jeffries.house.gov/2025/08/24/l...
jeffries.house.gov/2025/10/24/l...
"We are now receiving conflicting reports about the condition of our two Guard members and will provide additional updates once we receive more complete information. "
November 26, 2025 at 10:43 PM
"We are now receiving conflicting reports about the condition of our two Guard members and will provide additional updates once we receive more complete information. "
His campaign was contacted by the media weeks before the story broke, and his immediate response was to ignore them.
November 21, 2025 at 3:10 PM
His campaign was contacted by the media weeks before the story broke, and his immediate response was to ignore them.
The real fun is when they start explaining that you completely misread their original statement and obviously everyone is just being too mean to them.
November 17, 2025 at 7:13 PM
The real fun is when they start explaining that you completely misread their original statement and obviously everyone is just being too mean to them.
Combined with the earlier "Dems about to cave" article, it seems like Republicans are still working internally on the easiest part of their proposal and haven't reached bipartisan negotiations.
November 6, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Combined with the earlier "Dems about to cave" article, it seems like Republicans are still working internally on the easiest part of their proposal and haven't reached bipartisan negotiations.
It's also an odd conclusion to take from the article, as written.
I mean, maybe the GOP plan really is "We're promising them a vote later". But as written, it's "Passing health care tax credits will be part of the deal".
I mean, maybe the GOP plan really is "We're promising them a vote later". But as written, it's "Passing health care tax credits will be part of the deal".
November 4, 2025 at 1:54 AM
It's also an odd conclusion to take from the article, as written.
I mean, maybe the GOP plan really is "We're promising them a vote later". But as written, it's "Passing health care tax credits will be part of the deal".
I mean, maybe the GOP plan really is "We're promising them a vote later". But as written, it's "Passing health care tax credits will be part of the deal".
Quick reminder that Platner ignored people telling him he had a Nazi tattoo.
November 3, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Quick reminder that Platner ignored people telling him he had a Nazi tattoo.
The timing matched the reddit posts oppo for initial stories, but the follow-up social media post after the tattoo podcast matches the resignation timeline much more closely and offers an explanation for where she disagreed with the campaign.
October 23, 2025 at 5:58 PM
The timing matched the reddit posts oppo for initial stories, but the follow-up social media post after the tattoo podcast matches the resignation timeline much more closely and offers an explanation for where she disagreed with the campaign.
This is them getting ahead of the story after they were contacted by the media asking questions about his tattoo.
Left unsaid is why he waited until AFTER they got ahead of the story to cover up the tattoo.
vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
Left unsaid is why he waited until AFTER they got ahead of the story to cover up the tattoo.
vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
October 22, 2025 at 8:19 PM
This is them getting ahead of the story after they were contacted by the media asking questions about his tattoo.
Left unsaid is why he waited until AFTER they got ahead of the story to cover up the tattoo.
vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
Left unsaid is why he waited until AFTER they got ahead of the story to cover up the tattoo.
vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
"It’s been covered up with some kind of Celtic knot with a dog on it, because that’s far more in line with my opinions"
www.vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
www.vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
October 22, 2025 at 5:27 PM
"It’s been covered up with some kind of Celtic knot with a dog on it, because that’s far more in line with my opinions"
www.vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
www.vanityfair.com/news/story/g...
Senate Republicans went to Politico on Sept 25 and said directly "We're requesting a meeting with the White House" and it appears they haven't received a response.
October 16, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Senate Republicans went to Politico on Sept 25 and said directly "We're requesting a meeting with the White House" and it appears they haven't received a response.
In related news, Mills confronted Trump directly and that confrontation is mentioned in a few headlines.
But I guess it doesn't count now for unexplained reasons.
But I guess it doesn't count now for unexplained reasons.
October 14, 2025 at 2:52 PM
In related news, Mills confronted Trump directly and that confrontation is mentioned in a few headlines.
But I guess it doesn't count now for unexplained reasons.
But I guess it doesn't count now for unexplained reasons.
September 20, 2025 at 3:12 AM
The BBC write-up - www.bbc.com/news/live/c2...
September 10, 2025 at 10:58 PM
The BBC write-up - www.bbc.com/news/live/c2...
I think they're reporting on this social media post. It could be a sarcastic joke or serious, I'm relying on an automated translation to read it.
t.me/luchaalmada1...
t.me/luchaalmada1...
September 4, 2025 at 3:43 AM
I think they're reporting on this social media post. It could be a sarcastic joke or serious, I'm relying on an automated translation to read it.
t.me/luchaalmada1...
t.me/luchaalmada1...
Except that was the case in 2024 as well.
August 12, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Except that was the case in 2024 as well.
This is impressively bad.
August 8, 2025 at 8:20 PM
This is impressively bad.
The news article headlines really help explain a lot about our current media landscape.
August 1, 2025 at 6:29 PM
The news article headlines really help explain a lot about our current media landscape.
It took her a while, but she's finally figured out how to defend her use of bipartisan as not referring to the Democratic party.
July 10, 2025 at 9:33 PM
It took her a while, but she's finally figured out how to defend her use of bipartisan as not referring to the Democratic party.
I am reminded that she got into a dumb argument a couple of days ago over similar nonsense.
July 10, 2025 at 6:59 PM
I am reminded that she got into a dumb argument a couple of days ago over similar nonsense.