it's enough sean

please let us pay for the updates

I can hear the Goofy scream in my head

the cups evolved to look like this to fend off predators

tl;dr verification needs to have the same energy as “Sent from my iPhone”

A 🍅 button

that way verified people can make official statements, etc, and even attest their own identity upon request when needed (by posting, "hey that's really me" with the check). but they are require to present the same as "regular people" most of the time to get any meaningful engagement

Maybe have the verified status show up by default on the profile page, but not on posts, unless when posting the user checks an opt-in box for each post, every time, and posts that are “verified” cannot be liked

IMO you need to fight differentiation of status at the UX level, either by making verification seem “duller”, or by requiring sacrificing some functionality in exchange for it, therefore making it undesirable, unless absolutely needed

I don't think Bluesky will make the same mistakes early Twitter verification team supposedly did (handing off verified status to friends/people they liked, exchanging it for favors, etc) but people will always find creative ways to push the limits of policies, especially when status is on the line

To verify people, you must also unfortunately decide who is/isn't worth verifying. Unless your policy from the get go is clearly “everyone that wants to be verified can be verified”, (not feasible) it will become a status game around either meeting the criteria, or skirting them somehow

Yeah, it's unfortunate though, as other sites don't have nearly as much “horizontality” like Bluesky or Twitter. Instagram/YouTube/TikTok have comment sections, so there's already an intrinsic status asymmetry between content creator and audiences. Here we're all peers interacting at the same level

it has pretty much been bad from day one, way before the whole subscription thing, because of the status/vanity game... I'm unconvinced implementing with the same UX will promote better behavior/associations

“Toon Link” is generally allowed to have more personality than his other incarnations. Going further in that direction could work, but I'm not really sure if this version relies too heavily on physical humor (facilitated by the proportions/art-style) in a way that wouldn't translate well otherwise.

The hardest part is of course finding a viable personality that is iconic enough, fitting enough, and not plain insufferable. Existing attempts so far haven't been very good.

I don't really buy the argument that the “silent protagonist” trope is essential/inextricable to what makes the Zelda series so good, narratively or otherwise, or is a hard requirement for the level of immersion/self-insertion the games are known for.

Also it is backwards compatible, with a really large catalog. Assuming it can run existing games "better", this is already enough incentive to drive sales

O 11 e o 14 você pode pular porque são online