Parker Molloy? Good-faith discussions? I guess you have never tried to talk to PM about aspects of the trans community or trans medicine, and I suppose PM has never told you to "drink bleach".

Whether we call those people "detransitioners" or "dessisters" or "disenchanted" or they don't call themselves anything, but they're quiet quitters—no matter what, these people are choosing to step away from the whole transgender belief system.

May they find peace in 2026!

I am a person of trans experience. Jesse Singal's "crime" is challenging narratives that are comfortable, but are often wrong or over-simplified. That is not violent, and it's not an excuse to give in to a braying mob.

I'm done. You only care about history insofar as it supports your contemporary viewpoints and claims. You have no interest in contextualizing any information that contradicts your beliefs or challenges your ideology.

And of course, since you don't want to have a conversation any more, you're instead trying to whip up a mob of outraged followers. You've no more ideas left, I guess.

Wow, what a dishonest person you are. Horribly dishonest. It's been challenging to engage with you, but up to this point I thought you'd been giving it your best, and so I was tolerant. But not any longer. Sorry, this is over the line.

"Let's trans homosexual men in the service of rewriting history!" Look, two can play at that game. But it's a stupid game. raumdernamen.mauthausen-memorial.org/index.php?id...

By the way, what do you suppose this book contains? Are these "trans people?" In the article you linked (thank you), and which I read, yes, these would be "trans people".

You're incorrect. I'm not denying individual victims of the Holocaust. I'm denying that the Nazis systemically prosecuted "trans" as a class. Victims DID exist, they were surely persecuted for being sexual minorities, but not as a class that anyone, victim or victimizer, would think of as "trans".

So calling me a “Holocaust denier” for rejecting the retroactive framing of a “trans community” as a Nazi target misreads my view. I’m arguing for historical accuracy, not denial. Some victims might fit today’s “trans” label, though they likely didn’t see themselves that way.