Christian Pieter Hoffmann
@cphoffmann.bsky.social
1.5K followers 360 following 75 posts
Prof @ University of Leipzig, Institute for Communication and Media Studies & Institute for Political Science (Private account & personal opinions, of course.)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
cphoffmann.bsky.social
📢 New publication on the positioning of executives on LinkedIn. We analyze more than 4'500 posts of CEOs and CEOs of EURO STOXX 50 companies and find distinct communicator profiles (re. content, timing, frequency, audiences and engagement).
🔗 www.emerald.com/ccij/article...
cphoffmann.bsky.social
📢 New OA publication w/ @shelleyboulianne.bsky.social
Do privacy concerns inhibit political posting on social media? Yes, but. We examine FB, X & Insta in 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇫🇷🇨🇦 and find that highly politically interested users discount privacy concerns and seek large audiences.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
cphoffmann.bsky.social
Well, the Draghi report offers some pointers for where we would need to go :)
cphoffmann.bsky.social
Beyond that, the harsh fact is that Europe is simply unwilling to go through the necessary painful reforms to become competitive. So we can complain about our dynamic „big brother“ USA all we want (re. platforms, climate, Ukraine etc.), but we simply do not have the strength to offer an alternative.
cphoffmann.bsky.social
I think the word „run“ is key here. Economically, I doubt that would be a wise use of public resources. I would rather agree with: it is up to government to set the conditions for economic agents to develop and offer these infrastructures. Which is what the EU does (DSA, DMA).
cphoffmann.bsky.social
So while „we should…“ or „we need…“ sounds nice, a thorough analysis must take economic and political economy facts and frameworks into account. Which would lead us back to the status quo: imperfect attempts to regulate the platforms we have within the given geopolitical realities. /end
cphoffmann.bsky.social
And even if European governments could mobilize the required resources, from a political economy perspective, what reason do we have to expect that government is capable and willing to create & run platforms that are more conducive to a liberal and open democracy? 4/
cphoffmann.bsky.social
First, the enormous cost of offering & running state-of-the-art digital platforms. Europe cannot even mobilize sufficient resources to maintain its defence in the face of a hot war. What should make us believe that it could mobilize billions of Euros to run competitive „public“ digital platforms? 3/
cphoffmann.bsky.social
…what reason do we have to expect that they would differ in any meaningful way from the current platforms?
So that would imply that we can or should not depend on the market to provide these platforms, but government? Which would lead to more problems: 2/
cphoffmann.bsky.social
There are also important economic arguments here: Social media look and work the way they do due to market dynamics, supply and demand. If Europe had sufficiently open and dynamic (capital) markets to create competitive digital platforms (which it doesn’t)… 1/
Reposted by Christian Pieter Hoffmann
cphoffmann.bsky.social
📢 New publication on the emergence of the #financialcommunication function in #startups. We interviewed both founders and investors to develop a model of how investor relations initially emerge - and then evolve across funding stages. w/ Lea Knabben & Torben Krueper
www.emerald.com/jcom/article...
The emergence of the financial communication function: exploring investor relations in start-ups
Purpose. Start-up companies need to attract the interest of investors to grow and mature. Yet, little is known about the investor relations (IR) of start-ups. This study applies a neo-institutionalist...
www.emerald.com
cphoffmann.bsky.social
This was a wonderful cooperation with Patric Raemy and @manuelpuppis.ch, and or Leipzig team Daniel Bendahan Bitton, Hannah Oetting and Alexander Godulla. More on our #DeepfakeProject below 👇🏼2/2

bsky.app/profile/cpho...
cphoffmann.bsky.social
📢 New OA publication in @sscratsage.bsky.social from our #DeepfakeProject. We find that perceived exposure to deepfakes is linked to media cynicism, and that detection self-efficacy positively moderates this relationship. No effect for intellectual humility :/
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
cphoffmann.bsky.social
New OA article out @journstudies 📢 We conducted interviews with journalists in Germany and Switzerland to explore the compatibility of #deepfake technology with journalistic norms. We identify boundary conditions for the use of deepfakes in journalism 1/2
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Deepfakes and Journalism: Normative Considerations and Implications
The possibility of using deepfake technology to create synthetic media content in journalism requires careful ethical deliberations. Being that journalism is a norm-oriented social institution, the...
www.tandfonline.com
cphoffmann.bsky.social
Grateful to be part of this wonderful special issue 👇🏼 Congratulations to the editors!
thinkmacro.bsky.social
New special issue, "Comparative Approaches to Studying Privacy," edited by #CPRN is now published in Social Media + Society!

journals.sagepub.com/topic/collec...

w/ @lutzid.bsky.social, Lemi Baruh, Kelly Quinn, @masurphil.bsky.social, Carsten Wilhelm (comparativeprivacy.org)
journals.sagepub.com
Reposted by Christian Pieter Hoffmann
thinkmacro.bsky.social
3. In "It's Fine If Others Do It Too" @cphoffmann.bsky.social and ‪‪@shelleyboulianne.bsky.social‬ nvestigate the relationship between privacy concerns, social influence, and online political expression on Facebook across five Western democracies. doi.org/10.1177/2056...
Reposted by Christian Pieter Hoffmann
cphoffmann.bsky.social
📢 New paper out @JITP /w @shelleyboulianne.bsky.social & Thomas Feiler: Who uses Twitch for politics? Based on a survey in 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 🇬🇧 we present descriptive data for an underresearched platform & delve into the personality of those who see & post political content👇🏼
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Using Twitch for politics? The role of personality across five countries
Twitch is a popular live-streaming platform primarily used in the context of gaming. Streamers tend to be very sensitive to the content shared in their streams, often eschewing political content. A...
www.tandfonline.com
cphoffmann.bsky.social
We hope that this study will inspire future research on politics @Twitch. We believe that Twitch already is an important platform for politics and will become even more so in the future. Thanks to my co-authors @shelleyboulianne.bsky.social & Thomas Feiler, and the editorial team @JITP 🙏🏼 /end
cphoffmann.bsky.social
We apply a personality psychology lens and find that those who post politics are low(er) on openness, conscientiousness and agreeableness. We argue that politics on Twitch still goes against established platform norms and attracts rule-breaker personalities. 5/
cphoffmann.bsky.social
We find that about half of the surveyed Twitch users post political content at least occasionally. However, quite a few Twitch users dislike politics on the platform, many streamers avoid political content. So who posts political content? 4/
cphoffmann.bsky.social
Almost 2/3 of our sample see political content on the platform at least occasionally. Even in the process of conducting this study, we realized that many still underestimate the importance of Twitch for political communication. 3/
cphoffmann.bsky.social
We find that about 20% of our (quota) sample use Twitch. Most studies of Twitch understandably focus on gaming. But more & more influencers, journalists & politicians use the platform. So what about politics? 2/