Manuel Puppis
@manuelpuppis.ch
680 followers 410 following 190 posts
Professor of Media Structures & Governance at DCM, University of Fribourg. Vice-President Swiss Federal Media Commission. Doing comparative research on media policy, platform governance, digitalization of the public sphere, Swiss media system.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
phwa.ch
Wie bereit diese Redaktionen sind, Propaganda für Faschismus zu machen…
Tages-Anzeiger-Headline: «Trump verdient den Nobelpreis» - so reagiert die Welt auf den Gaza-Deal
manuelpuppis.ch
Excellent advice for everyone in academia.
mikeananny.bsky.social
Dunno if it's helpful to anyone, but I offer this in the spirit of academics not talking enough about rejection & students sometimes not getting mentoring on the point.

A student (primary author) & I just had a paper rejected from a journal, & I wrote this reply to them sharing the news with me.
Abbreviated text of screenshot of email:

"When I get a decision like this---I've had plenty of rejections, btw, it's a common experience!---I like to:

    give myself a few days to just sit with the answer;
    go to the reviewer comments with fresh eyes and hopefully a constructive attitude;
    read the reviewer comments and classify them into 3 types of feedback: big / structural things that might necessitate fundamentally re-thinking the paper; mezzo-level things that could be addressed within the scope / frame of the project; minutiae that are easy to do (e.g., points about language / grammar / adding citations)
    for each of those, I think about:
        what do I agree with and think was a reasonable reading of the paper;
        what do I think is not reasonable / doesn't require further consideration / is something that the reviewers didn't get / is something that was particular to that journal;
        what do I *want* to work on / make the paper into / where am I willing to invest energy
    finally, with this distance and structured thinking, I think about other venues for the piece (where to submit it to next) and what kind of changes (if any!) are required before submitting to a different venue.  While it's usually good to make some changes based on reviewers' feedback (they're smart people who gave this consideration and the comments are largely thoughtful), it could be that a different venue would be a better fit and not require (or even want) the changes suggested by reviewers for the journal that rejected the piece.

I'm happy to talk about this in our next scheduled meeting / before then / any time.

And just to reiterate: I truly hope that you don't take this news too hard.  It's a very common part of this whole academia business, it's ideally how work gets better and makes stronger contributions, and it's zero reflection on your standing or future as a scholar.

    All best,
    -- M."
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
mikeananny.bsky.social
Dunno if it's helpful to anyone, but I offer this in the spirit of academics not talking enough about rejection & students sometimes not getting mentoring on the point.

A student (primary author) & I just had a paper rejected from a journal, & I wrote this reply to them sharing the news with me.
Abbreviated text of screenshot of email:

"When I get a decision like this---I've had plenty of rejections, btw, it's a common experience!---I like to:

    give myself a few days to just sit with the answer;
    go to the reviewer comments with fresh eyes and hopefully a constructive attitude;
    read the reviewer comments and classify them into 3 types of feedback: big / structural things that might necessitate fundamentally re-thinking the paper; mezzo-level things that could be addressed within the scope / frame of the project; minutiae that are easy to do (e.g., points about language / grammar / adding citations)
    for each of those, I think about:
        what do I agree with and think was a reasonable reading of the paper;
        what do I think is not reasonable / doesn't require further consideration / is something that the reviewers didn't get / is something that was particular to that journal;
        what do I *want* to work on / make the paper into / where am I willing to invest energy
    finally, with this distance and structured thinking, I think about other venues for the piece (where to submit it to next) and what kind of changes (if any!) are required before submitting to a different venue.  While it's usually good to make some changes based on reviewers' feedback (they're smart people who gave this consideration and the comments are largely thoughtful), it could be that a different venue would be a better fit and not require (or even want) the changes suggested by reviewers for the journal that rejected the piece.

I'm happy to talk about this in our next scheduled meeting / before then / any time.

And just to reiterate: I truly hope that you don't take this news too hard.  It's a very common part of this whole academia business, it's ideally how work gets better and makes stronger contributions, and it's zero reflection on your standing or future as a scholar.

    All best,
    -- M."
manuelpuppis.ch
Die grosse Leitartikel-Show!
manuelpuppis.ch
Endlich wieder Fernsehen für weisse Männer.
karpi.bsky.social
Ich weiss nicht, was für Konsequenzen Videomodelle wie SORA 2 haben werden - aber ich mach mir jetzt mein eigenes Fernsehprogramm.
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
presserat.bsky.social
Mitgliedschaft bei uns wäre ein einfach zu überprüfendes Qualitätskriterium (Grundvoraussetzung) für die Förderung.
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
mediamorphis.bsky.social
Both things can be true.
pressgazette.co.uk
"I so often hear that young people are not willing to pay for news. That’s complete bullshit. Young people are so interested in the world"

How Danish publisher Zetland connected with young audiences even though it wasn't targeting them specifically pressgazette.co.uk/media_busine...
CEO of Danish publisher Zetland: 'It's bullshit to say young people aren't willing to pay for news'
Bonnier News has taken a majority stake in Danish publisher Zetland which reaches a strong base of young people with digital subscriptions.
pressgazette.co.uk
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
mediamorphis.bsky.social
Trump administration squeezes the chokepoints, Apple caves. Unbelievable how many businesses across the internet & digital media stack won't even use the protections the 1st Amendment provides. It's not just the rule of law that's being suspended but the culture of democracy that is being shattered.
esqueer.net
There's nothing illegal about ICE block. This is solely about Apple appeasing the Trump regime.

With Google removing sideloading next year, these companies will have total control over what runs on your phone.

www.businessinsider.com/apple-iceblo...
Apple removes ICEBlock app from App Store
Apple on Thursday removed the immigration enforcement tracking app, ICEBlock, from the App Store, citing "safety risks."
www.businessinsider.com
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
theonion.com
This is not a paid advertisement. Subscribe at membership.theonion.com to receive the newspaper and see more print-exclusive content.
ICE is hiring!
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
walterolson.bsky.social
“ABC7 spoke to Pertissue Fisher, a woman who lives in the building. She said ICE agents took everyone in the building, including her, and asked questions later….’They was bringing the kids down, too, had them zip tied to each other.’”

It can’t happen here, you say. But it is happening.
ICE agents raid South Shore apartments; Trump says Chicago could become military training ground
ICE agents raided a South Shore apartment building overnight as the city braces for a possible military deployment.
abc7chicago.com
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
npr.org
NPR @npr.org · 7d
Today marks the first day in public media’s history without federal funding. And we’re not going anywhere.

Listeners like you keep our mission alive. Protect one of the last places where America comes together to hear itself.

Stand with us today. Donate at this link: n.pr/46wamAj
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
shoutingboy.bsky.social
Now I feel like we need that introduction.

"Welcome to Bluesky, m'name's Craig, I'm officially a Bluesky Elder, which means I know things about Alf I wish I didn't"
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
watertigernyc.bsky.social
File under "Fuck, I Wish I Thought of That!"
The generals are calling them fat man and little boy because of how badly they bombed.
manuelpuppis.ch
Auftakt zu Tag 2 der von der "Agora Digital Transformation" und gemeinsam mit dem @bredowinstitut.bsky.social durchgeführten Zukunftswerkstatt Public Service Media / Dialogformate mit Blick auf den Hamburger Hafen
Fernrohr Blick aus dem Workshopraum auf den Hamburger Hafen
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
audacityofdespair.bsky.social
Yes, Vance is a fatuous, ahistorical moron without the slightest awareness of Operation Paperclip and its import to the U.S. Space Program. No, Mr. Sagal, you should not publicly correct him; this administration will, on second impulse, rush to praise Nazism for producing the best rocket scientists.
Reposted by Manuel Puppis
hystericalblkns.bsky.social
If you’re on academia dot edu, let me suggest that you strongly consider deleting your account.
The new TOC from academia dot edu. 

By creating an Account with Academia.edu, you grant us a worldwide, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable license, permission, and consent for Academia.edu to use your Member Content and your personal information (including, but not limited to, your name, voice, signature, photograph, likeness, city, institutional affiliations, citations, mentions, publications, and areas of interest) in any manner, including for the purpose of advertising, selling, or soliciting the use or purchase of Academia.edu's Services.
manuelpuppis.ch
At #ECREA-CLP, Evert Kanse is presenting our study "Who gets to be the DSC" on how EU and EEA member states picked their Digital Services Coordinators. In short: no pattern, expertise often used as a justification (but can mean very different things)
map of DSCs in Europe presented by Evert Kanse
manuelpuppis.ch
Sara Solarova and colleagues propose a new way to audit platforms behaviorally instead of relying on self-reported data and whatever traditional auditors come up with.
Social Media Algorithmic Auditing
manuelpuppis.ch
Fascinating panel at #ECREA-CLP on DSA implementation.

First Sally Broughton and Krisztina Rozgonyi on how to evaluate risk mitigation, then Sara Solarova on algorithmic auditing and finally Rita Gsenger on content governance.