cr1sp_sandw1ch
banner
cr1spsandw1ch.bsky.social
cr1sp_sandw1ch
@cr1spsandw1ch.bsky.social
@cr1sp_sandw1ch on the ex-bird site

Hmmm. In my defence I was probably drunk.

Software Developer

Yorkshire, UK
Transphobes are usually - and it shocks me to see this typed out - less self aware than Liz Truss.
December 18, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Fandango fandango
Kiss beelzebub for me

What a Queen bit that was!
December 17, 2025 at 11:20 PM
The creative process distilled into a couple of sentences.
December 17, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Reposted by cr1sp_sandw1ch
History: great to read about, terrible to live through.
December 16, 2025 at 10:03 AM
History: great to read about, terrible to live through.
December 16, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Minger the merciless?
December 16, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Canyonero!
December 16, 2025 at 12:47 AM
YES… HA HA HA… YES!
December 16, 2025 at 12:42 AM
6171st not th 🤦‍♀️
December 15, 2025 at 7:26 PM
It’s completely mad…

They can’t stand a trans woman entering at all.

Eg the London Marathon where a trans woman came 6171th in the female category, winning only a participation medal.

Uproar in the UK press from the usual suspects.
December 15, 2025 at 7:24 PM
You can’t be a progressive transphobe.

It’s a paradoxical statement.
December 15, 2025 at 7:11 PM
“Equality for some” seems to be their mantra these days.
December 15, 2025 at 7:05 PM
And even then they still complain (eg Park Run, which is a FUN RUN).

The more ground GCs are given, the more they demand.
December 15, 2025 at 7:02 PM
It’s probably helped the Scary Clown industry though.
December 15, 2025 at 6:52 PM
It’s the thought that counts…
December 15, 2025 at 6:46 PM
There are vast amounts of public money being siphoned off the NHS by private companies for little positive effect.

*This* is the real problem, not the staff demanding *fair* payment for their services.
December 15, 2025 at 6:40 PM
The whole thing is a train-wreck of epic proportions.

Anyone who thinks FWS “clarified” things is either lying or delusional.

The best thing to have done with the EHRC guidance would be to shred it.

Trans people have been using the toilets of their acquired gender for decades without problems.
December 15, 2025 at 6:27 PM
There’s no “right” way to do what the GCs want - their demands aren’t grounded in reality.

Whatever Labour does now they are going to get awful press.

As you say, deciding to take the route they did is a massive political error (one of many now).
December 15, 2025 at 3:47 PM
The papers will gloss-over it when it happens to trans people.

First time it happens to a white straight cis person all hell will let loose in the press.
December 15, 2025 at 3:40 PM
I don’t think they fully appreciate what will happen when they drop the guidance.

It is going be chaos if not significantly changed, and it is likely (numbers wise) to be cis women deemed not feminine enough that are going to get targeted by the toilet police.

It wont look good in the papers.
December 15, 2025 at 3:03 PM
It would no doubt, be written by the lowest bidder, barely work and introduce security vulnerabilities in a piece of software you can’t turn off.

The KGB and other adversaries must be rubbing their hands with glee at the prospect.

That’s before we even get to the inevitable scope creep.
December 15, 2025 at 2:51 PM