@craig-4.bsky.social
Husband, dad, engineer.
Economic hobbyist.
Advocate for diverse humans.
Pro science.
🏳️🌈
Economic hobbyist.
Advocate for diverse humans.
Pro science.
🏳️🌈
Rants like this will raise interest rates.
This is pro-inflation rhetoric. Markets will, eventually, take note and demand higher return for longer-term federal bonds and, related, mortgages.
He doesn’t know how any of this works.
This is pro-inflation rhetoric. Markets will, eventually, take note and demand higher return for longer-term federal bonds and, related, mortgages.
He doesn’t know how any of this works.
December 24, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Rants like this will raise interest rates.
This is pro-inflation rhetoric. Markets will, eventually, take note and demand higher return for longer-term federal bonds and, related, mortgages.
He doesn’t know how any of this works.
This is pro-inflation rhetoric. Markets will, eventually, take note and demand higher return for longer-term federal bonds and, related, mortgages.
He doesn’t know how any of this works.
The DOJ is not Trump’s personal lawyer.
x.com/TheJusticeDe...
The most bizarre defense of Trump yet.
The most bizarre defense of Trump yet.
December 24, 2025 at 12:15 AM
The DOJ is not Trump’s personal lawyer.
Denying coverage for pre-existing conditions isn’t healthcare. It’s extortion.
LANKFORD: In 2010, before Obamacare kicked in, the normal healthcare premium was $215.
HUNT: Right. But insurance companies could refuse to cover you for a preexisting condition
LANKFORD: That's true.
HUNT: Right. But insurance companies could refuse to cover you for a preexisting condition
LANKFORD: That's true.
December 21, 2025 at 9:36 PM
Denying coverage for pre-existing conditions isn’t healthcare. It’s extortion.
“The reason why we are still reviewing documents is to protect victims”
The only “victim” they care about protecting is Trump; the world’s biggest victim. 🙄
apnews.com/article/blan...
The only “victim” they care about protecting is Trump; the world’s biggest victim. 🙄
apnews.com/article/blan...
Top Trump administration official defends partial release of Epstein files as Democrats cry foul
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is defending the Justice Department’s decision to release just a fraction of the Jeffrey Epstein files by the congressionally mandated deadline.
apnews.com
December 21, 2025 at 8:48 PM
“The reason why we are still reviewing documents is to protect victims”
The only “victim” they care about protecting is Trump; the world’s biggest victim. 🙄
apnews.com/article/blan...
The only “victim” they care about protecting is Trump; the world’s biggest victim. 🙄
apnews.com/article/blan...
Reposted
This is mental illness.
December 18, 2025 at 7:02 PM
This is mental illness.
Would be great if this monstrosity was delayed until after he’s out of office.
apple.news/A1bzdJWlrQ_a...
apple.news/A1bzdJWlrQ_a...
National Trust sues to stop Trump’s ballroom construction — The Washington Post
The organization, which is charged by Congress with historic preservation, is seeking to halt construction on one of the president’s priorities.
apple.news
December 12, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Would be great if this monstrosity was delayed until after he’s out of office.
apple.news/A1bzdJWlrQ_a...
apple.news/A1bzdJWlrQ_a...
Go get them!
BREAKING: The DOJ has filed its opposition to my motion for expedited processing of the EPSTEIN TRAINING VIDEOS. They're arguing that there's NO WIDESPREAD PUBLIC INTEREST. My latest: www.muellershewrote.com/p/new-doj-re...
NEW: DOJ Responded to Our Epstein Training Materials Motion, Arguing There's No Public Interest
They also argue that the existence of the training videos doesn't raise any questions about government integrity!
www.muellershewrote.com
December 10, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Go get them!
Better yet…
Imagine if all Americans bound together and negotiated healthcare pricing and coverage as one, huge group! Think of the power to lower costs we’d have then!
We could call it something like ‘Medicare’.
😉
Imagine if all Americans bound together and negotiated healthcare pricing and coverage as one, huge group! Think of the power to lower costs we’d have then!
We could call it something like ‘Medicare’.
😉
Yes, and what if your access to affordable healthcare was considered a right guaranteed to everyone by the government and not a bauble of certain types of employment or friggin club store membership? What then?
Rand Paul on his healthcare plan: "What if you could join Costco? Costco has 44m members and if one person negotiated for all 44 and they bought a group plan like Toyota or General Motors does, they would be the largest collective entity in the country. They would drive prices down by sheer might."
December 9, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Better yet…
Imagine if all Americans bound together and negotiated healthcare pricing and coverage as one, huge group! Think of the power to lower costs we’d have then!
We could call it something like ‘Medicare’.
😉
Imagine if all Americans bound together and negotiated healthcare pricing and coverage as one, huge group! Think of the power to lower costs we’d have then!
We could call it something like ‘Medicare’.
😉
Why, why, why does ANYONE listen to Fuentes!
(Or Piers for that matter.)
(Or Piers for that matter.)
PIERS: “You’re not gay?”
FUENTES: “No. But women are very difficult to be around.”
P: “Should they vote?”
F: “No.”
PIERS: “They should stay home?”
FUENTES: “Yeah.”
PIERS: “So you’re just a misogynistic dinosaur. Have you ever had sex?”
FUENTES: “No.”
PIERS: “Wow. Says the guy who never got laid.”
FUENTES: “No. But women are very difficult to be around.”
P: “Should they vote?”
F: “No.”
PIERS: “They should stay home?”
FUENTES: “Yeah.”
PIERS: “So you’re just a misogynistic dinosaur. Have you ever had sex?”
FUENTES: “No.”
PIERS: “Wow. Says the guy who never got laid.”
December 9, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Why, why, why does ANYONE listen to Fuentes!
(Or Piers for that matter.)
(Or Piers for that matter.)
Justice Jackson is feirce! 🔥
Hear every word she says or writes!
Hear every word she says or writes!
Justice Jackson to Solicitor General Sauer (just now, in Trump v. Slaughter arguments):
December 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Justice Jackson is feirce! 🔥
Hear every word she says or writes!
Hear every word she says or writes!
So corruption in the open!
December 8, 2025 at 4:23 PM
So corruption in the open!
Boycott Xwitter.
December 8, 2025 at 5:50 AM
Boycott Xwitter.
Truth
My thing about birthright citizenship and “originalism” is like… the jurists of Wong Kim Ark in 1898 WERE ADULTS DURING THE RATIFICATION OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT. SO THEY KNEW THE ORIGINAL PUBLIC MEANING AND TOLD YOU WHAT IT WAS IN WONG KIM ARK!!!
December 8, 2025 at 5:43 AM
Truth
The ONLY committee in the House that was working during the Epstein shutdown was the one scrubbing the files. They’ve had all the time they needed. The files will be squeaky clean.
Do you all remember November 19? When the vote was ratified to release the Epstein Files in their entirety? Yeah...it's December 7 now and still just some emails and a few pictures.
How do we prove that the files are being scrubbed and modified? Gee...if only a near-one-month delay could...
How do we prove that the files are being scrubbed and modified? Gee...if only a near-one-month delay could...
December 8, 2025 at 2:30 AM
The ONLY committee in the House that was working during the Epstein shutdown was the one scrubbing the files. They’ve had all the time they needed. The files will be squeaky clean.
Non-profits enable billionaires to decide how the government spends taxpayers money.
A billionaire who gives $1M to this ‘pregnancy center’ reduces their taxes by ~$370,000. That’s the same as Congress deciding to spend that money; but the billionaire decided.
www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/cour...
A billionaire who gives $1M to this ‘pregnancy center’ reduces their taxes by ~$370,000. That’s the same as Congress deciding to spend that money; but the billionaire decided.
www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/cour...
Court appears sympathetic to faith-based pregnancy centers’ argument
The Supreme Court on Tuesday was sympathetic to a group of faith-based pregnancy centers in their quest to challenge New Jersey’s demand for information about the group’s fundraising practices in […]
www.scotusblog.com
December 2, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Non-profits enable billionaires to decide how the government spends taxpayers money.
A billionaire who gives $1M to this ‘pregnancy center’ reduces their taxes by ~$370,000. That’s the same as Congress deciding to spend that money; but the billionaire decided.
www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/cour...
A billionaire who gives $1M to this ‘pregnancy center’ reduces their taxes by ~$370,000. That’s the same as Congress deciding to spend that money; but the billionaire decided.
www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/cour...
“America First” was the slogan of the pro-Nazi movement in the USA in the 30’s.
McConnell knows that.
McConnell knows that.
That’s rich coming from the architect. McConnell is just as responsible as Trump. He thought he could still control Trump and the senators, but he got older and Trump got bolder.
#leopardsatemyface #Politics #News
December 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
“America First” was the slogan of the pro-Nazi movement in the USA in the 30’s.
McConnell knows that.
McConnell knows that.
Reposted
You pull yourself up by your boostraps. Me? I DESERVE free money from the government, and so do my rich friends bsky.app/profile/cwar...
November 25, 2025 at 4:21 PM
You pull yourself up by your boostraps. Me? I DESERVE free money from the government, and so do my rich friends bsky.app/profile/cwar...
Wow!
November 25, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Wow!
David Sacks is an idiot.
November 25, 2025 at 6:05 PM
David Sacks is an idiot.
Right on!
We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community.
The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.
Don’t give up the ship.
The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.
Don’t give up the ship.
November 20, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Right on!
‘A spokesperson for Mark Epstein, says that Bubba is “a private individual who is not a public figure.”’
Ok. So this is confirmation that Trump did blow someone.
(Not that there’s anything wrong with that).
apple.news/AqnFXY8rNT8W...
Ok. So this is confirmation that Trump did blow someone.
(Not that there’s anything wrong with that).
apple.news/AqnFXY8rNT8W...
Jefrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton — Advocate
Mark Epstein wanted to ensure that “speculation does not unfairly implicate people who are not actually being referenced in those communications,” he said in a statement to The Advocate.
apple.news
November 16, 2025 at 5:39 PM
‘A spokesperson for Mark Epstein, says that Bubba is “a private individual who is not a public figure.”’
Ok. So this is confirmation that Trump did blow someone.
(Not that there’s anything wrong with that).
apple.news/AqnFXY8rNT8W...
Ok. So this is confirmation that Trump did blow someone.
(Not that there’s anything wrong with that).
apple.news/AqnFXY8rNT8W...
Reposted
Hey Megyn Kelly,
14-year-old Eloise would like a word:
“If my voice makes you uncomfortable, good…
because the minute adults start defending predators by defending the age of a child, you’re not protecting the truth, you’re protecting the predator.”
Sound up! 🔥🔊
1/2
14-year-old Eloise would like a word:
“If my voice makes you uncomfortable, good…
because the minute adults start defending predators by defending the age of a child, you’re not protecting the truth, you’re protecting the predator.”
Sound up! 🔥🔊
1/2
November 15, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Hey Megyn Kelly,
14-year-old Eloise would like a word:
“If my voice makes you uncomfortable, good…
because the minute adults start defending predators by defending the age of a child, you’re not protecting the truth, you’re protecting the predator.”
Sound up! 🔥🔊
1/2
14-year-old Eloise would like a word:
“If my voice makes you uncomfortable, good…
because the minute adults start defending predators by defending the age of a child, you’re not protecting the truth, you’re protecting the predator.”
Sound up! 🔥🔊
1/2
SCOTUS ruling will be irrelevant:
1. Will remove SOME tariffs under IEEPA.
2. Thomas will point to Trump’s unlimited authority under Section 338 as an alternative.
3. Won’t require tariff refunds.
Meanwhile: “Since Jan 33,000 manufacturing jobs have disappeared.”
apple.news/AEU6lr3ZnRKG...
1. Will remove SOME tariffs under IEEPA.
2. Thomas will point to Trump’s unlimited authority under Section 338 as an alternative.
3. Won’t require tariff refunds.
Meanwhile: “Since Jan 33,000 manufacturing jobs have disappeared.”
apple.news/AEU6lr3ZnRKG...
Trump goes on defense over tariffs as prices on everyday items keep rising — The Washington Post
The rollback of import taxes on coffee, bananas and many other foods is the latest sign that the administration could be forced to shift course.
apple.news
November 15, 2025 at 6:19 PM
SCOTUS ruling will be irrelevant:
1. Will remove SOME tariffs under IEEPA.
2. Thomas will point to Trump’s unlimited authority under Section 338 as an alternative.
3. Won’t require tariff refunds.
Meanwhile: “Since Jan 33,000 manufacturing jobs have disappeared.”
apple.news/AEU6lr3ZnRKG...
1. Will remove SOME tariffs under IEEPA.
2. Thomas will point to Trump’s unlimited authority under Section 338 as an alternative.
3. Won’t require tariff refunds.
Meanwhile: “Since Jan 33,000 manufacturing jobs have disappeared.”
apple.news/AEU6lr3ZnRKG...
How bad is it when we actually have to worry that the Supreme Court of the United States of America might, just might, actually take this case in order to protect this lifelong sexual predator.
apple.news/AaHj3mokuSXS...
apple.news/AaHj3mokuSXS...
Trump asks supreme court to throw out jury’s finding in E Jean Carroll lawsuit — Guardian US
Writer and author had testified, and won, at trial that the president had sexually assaulted her in the mid-1990s
apple.news
November 11, 2025 at 3:58 PM
How bad is it when we actually have to worry that the Supreme Court of the United States of America might, just might, actually take this case in order to protect this lifelong sexual predator.
apple.news/AaHj3mokuSXS...
apple.news/AaHj3mokuSXS...
And how is this insurance?
I mean, it’s great for the healthy, disaster for the sick.
I mean, it’s great for the healthy, disaster for the sick.
Econ 101 midterm question: Based on what you know about risk pools and adverse selection in healthcare markets, will giving people money instead of giving them money to buy health insurance lead these markets to function more effectively, or will it just lead more people to be uninsured?
November 8, 2025 at 9:52 PM
And how is this insurance?
I mean, it’s great for the healthy, disaster for the sick.
I mean, it’s great for the healthy, disaster for the sick.