Cris van Eijk
@crisveijk.bsky.social
1.5K followers 1.4K following 700 posts
International law, the (space) commons, and how they're made. PhD @newcastleuni.bsky.social | 🇺🇸🇳🇱🏳️‍🌈 | 🔊: krɪs van aɪk | he/him https://www.ncl.ac.uk/law/research/students/current-pgr-students/cristian-van-eijk/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
crisveijk.bsky.social
Excited to share my new article, 'The Exclusive Making of Space Law', just published in Leiden Journal of International Law. This article took 3 weeks to write the first draft, but 3 years to finalise, and I'm grateful to everyone who helped me along the way.

doi.org/10.1017/S0922156524000554
The exclusive making of space law | Leiden Journal of International Law | Cambridge Core
The exclusive making of space law
doi.org
crisveijk.bsky.social
Happy International Lesbian Day to all who celebrate!!

[Except the ones who got the UK Supreme Court to define 'lesbian' *for* us; they get nothing from me. A "chilling effect on lesbians", indeed...]
crisveijk.bsky.social
Just saw this once again, so let's say it again:

Boris Johnson did not resign because of PartyGate. He resigned because he knowingly covered up Chris Pincher's rampant sexual abuse of men, silenced complaints, appointed him to positions of power, and then lied to Parliament about all of the above.
crisveijk.bsky.social
The crux of this is Cruz asking 'why are MSNBC & CNN 'reliable' sources, but Fox News isn't?'

Bold of him, tbh. That answer costed Fox $787.5m - the largest media defamation settlement in US history.

Also, if democratised systems are too left-wing for you, that's kind of the point.
crisveijk.bsky.social
And it was a good episode!! A minor flinch at a brief moment where Oliver conflated archivists and librarians, which in my experience is a great way to piss off an archivist, but otherwise!!
crisveijk.bsky.social
Oh good, I was just about to DM you in case you hadn't seen!! Congrats!!
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
anthonyclark.bsky.social
Researching a book about presidential libraries: 12 years

Making 30+ visits to them: tens of thousands of dollars and many spent vacations and weekends

Trying to convince the country the system is in great need of reform: 10 more years

Your favorite show quoting your work and analysis: priceless
lastweektonight.com
Here’s last night’s story about presidential libraries, how they help shape history, the troubling ways they can be used, and – of course – some tasteful conjecture about one president’s undercarriage. youtu.be/dB1-lg-xZWc
Presidential Libraries: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
YouTube video by LastWeekTonight
youtu.be
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
neongrey.bsky.social
all discourse aside, there is one machine with consciousness. it's printers. they are alive and conscious and they hate you and they'd take your arm clean off if you let them. never trust a printer.
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
crisveijk.bsky.social
Carr: "America’s scientists often spend 40% of their time doing paperwork on grant applications... And the new grant applications they work on are too often aimed at what will get funded rather than what could have the biggest impact."

Unfundable grants include any that use the word 'cislunar'.
America’s scientists often spend 40% of their time doing paperwork on grant applications, rather than direct research. And the new grant applications they work on are too often aimed at what will get funded rather than what could have the biggest impact. University of Chicago professor James Evans summed up our problem nicely. He wrote: “Too many projects get funding because they are probable. But science moves forward one improbability at a time.”
crisveijk.bsky.social
Carr: "America’s scientists often spend 40% of their time doing paperwork on grant applications... And the new grant applications they work on are too often aimed at what will get funded rather than what could have the biggest impact."

Unfundable grants include any that use the word 'cislunar'.
America’s scientists often spend 40% of their time doing paperwork on grant applications, rather than direct research. And the new grant applications they work on are too often aimed at what will get funded rather than what could have the biggest impact. University of Chicago professor James Evans summed up our problem nicely. He wrote: “Too many projects get funding because they are probable. But science moves forward one improbability at a time.”
crisveijk.bsky.social
Also, slight problem with making October 'Space Month' & promising an overhaul of the FCC's satellite licensing regs:

§533(d) of the Admin Procedure Act requires all substantive rulemaking - yes, even straight-up burning the rulebook - to involve a 30-day publication period.

See you in November.
crisveijk.bsky.social
Those recommendations, and a great report that outlines the background for my sarcasms: www.gao.gov/products/gao...
www.gao.gov
crisveijk.bsky.social
The only "default-to-no" bit of this regulatory system is the lliteral categorical exclusion the FCC uses to avoid doing any EIAs for space activities.

Also, it'd be nice if the FCC would "default-to-yes" on the several open recommendations by the GAO, which it has promised to address since 2022.
crisveijk.bsky.social
Perhaps crime, migration, or extradition hadn't been invented when the CAT was made, way back in *checks notes* the mid-1980s. When Eng&Welsh crime rates looked like that.

And clearly crime /extradition must've skyrocketed since, to warrant qualifying the prohibition on torture- oh. Also no. Huh.
A chart from p. 159 of a UK Parliament Report (linked below), showing offences per 100,000 people in England and Wales in the 20th century. The chart shows a sharp increase in crime rate over the 1980s, from ~6,800 in 1981 to 11,000 in 1991.

https://www.parliament.uk/contentassets/90b7f09a39a74dbcaa34acdfe7a210cb/olympicbritain.pdf#page=159 A chart from Wikipedia, titled 'Crime in England and Wales from the Crime Survey (in 000s of crimes).' 

It shows that the crime rate in 1980 was roughly 10,500, then peaked in 1995, before steadily decreasing to ~6000 in 2015. Regardless, according to this chart, the crime rate has remained lower than it was in 1980 since approximately 2003. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_Kingdom#/media/File:CrimeinUK.png
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
mjsdc.bsky.social
When President AOC federalizes the National Guard in 2029 to protect abortion clinics, Ilan is going to magically discover an English treatise written in 1610 that proves Matthew Kacsmaryk can issue a nationwide injunction against her.
patsobkowski.com
We don’t have to carry water for dictators. Just my thought.
crisveijk.bsky.social
Do RTs =/≠ Endorsements? A Saga
crisveijk.bsky.social
okay @drnajimagi.bsky.social I have one for ya, which apparently happened in April (and *I just found out about*??

Comment: legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/arbitration-...
PCA Decision: pcacases.com/web/sendAtta...
crisveijk.bsky.social
Ah, shit, alt text pending, one sec
crisveijk.bsky.social
okay @drnajimagi.bsky.social I have one for ya, which apparently happened in April (and *I just found out about*??

Comment: legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/arbitration-...
PCA Decision: pcacases.com/web/sendAtta...
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
ryanenos.bsky.social
Somebody actually sat down and wrote these two sentences, one after another. www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/u...
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
crisveijk.bsky.social
This event is 63 years to the day after Hazem Zaki Nuseibeh, Rep of Jordan & proud Palestinian, spoke to the UNGA.

First, about space & the need for law - but law as pathway to justice, as right over might. Then, he moved directly to what that would mean for Palestine.

docs.un.org/en/A/PV.1138
UNGA, ‘Verbatim Record of the 1138th Meeting’ (1 Oct 1962) A/PV.1138, 239-240

“10. But of more immediate and lasting significance than exploration and control of outer space is our ability to control our inner selves, to make this planet a place worthy of decent and friendly habitation. And it is here in this hall that we meet in what is the most encompassing parliament of nations, to lay down the foundations for peace, goodwill and co-operation among nations. If we should fail in this pivotal task, then all the efforts which are being expended in various fields will have been of no avail, with the threat of extinction continuing to hover menacingly over our fates.” 
“11. But world peace cannot be achieved by pious hopes or even under the compulsion of fear or the instinctive desire for survival. Any such assumption would be a serious misreading not only of history, but of the inner springs of human motivation and behaviour. For there will always be differences and conflicts so long as human beings are what they are. What is imperative is that these conflicts and differences be dealt with and resolved in accordance with norms, procedures and attitudes that are just, equitable and commanding of universal acceptance and respect; it is essentially the rule of law, rather than the unruly whims or interests of any particular group. This has been the function and the achievement of domestic law in national societies. It is our challenge to make it equally applicable in the field of international relations.”
“12. The question now is: How can the Unite Nations work out a modus vivendi which would bring it as close as possible to a universally acceptable rule of law?” “17. As I address you, my mind irresistibly wanders several thousand miles away to where my countrymen – men, women and children, in town and in village, in refugee camps and in forced dispersal under every sky – have endured their suffering for fourteen long years. They are suffering morally, psychologically and physically, day in and day out, before the very eyes of the United Nations and, ironically, at a period which we boast to be the era of mankind's greatest emancipation.” 
“18. It would be redundant for me to restate the facts of the case, for there is hardly any other problem which has been discussed as thoroughly or as repeatedly during the past years; and yet, there is hardly any other case where less positive action has been taken.” 
“19. My countrymen, simple honest folks, are somewhat confused and bewildered by the snarls and the tangles with which a seemingly straightforward case has been side-tracked and shrouded, and I would be less than honest to them, or to you, if I did not restore the problem to its true, simple essentials.” 
“20. The truth of the problem is that here is a people – an ancient and homogeneous people – who have in the twentieth century not only been denied the right to self-government or self-determination, but even the right to exist in the homeland in which their forefathers have lived and died from time immemorial. They have been uprooted to make room for a conglomeration of alien peoples from all corners of the earth, having different backgrounds, different traditions, different languages and different races, and claiming to be united on the sole ground of professing the same religious faith. What a disservice to a great religion that its name should be used for such unholy and irreligious ends; for a blatant aggression against the very existence of another people.”
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
bymyong.bsky.social
"There have likely been 10,000 or more university redundancies in the academic year 2024-25..."
politicalquarterly.bsky.social
UK higher education now faces a very bleak future, retreating in the face of little public sympathy and limited political interest.

By Glen O'Hara, Professor of Modern and Contemporary History at Oxford Brookes University

politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/where-n...
Where now for Britain’s Universities?
UK higher education now faces a very bleak future, retreating in the face of little public sympathy and limited political interest.
politicalquarterly.org.uk
Reposted by Cris van Eijk
freedom.press
The National Security Agency ‘expedited’ a FOIA request — then took 1,827 days to process it.

The Defense Department ‘expedited’ another — it took 1,119 days.

The list goes on.

Now, Trump wants requesters to pay $50k if a court expedites a FOIA lawsuit?

No way.
Expedite a FOIA lawsuit? Trump administration wants $50K first
Pay-to-play comes for Freedom of Information Act litigation
freedom.press