CrypticBlah
crypticblah.bsky.social
CrypticBlah
@crypticblah.bsky.social
I should add the exception to that rule is the &lit where every word is doing double duty. The clue doesnt contain a definition per se, instead the whole clue is the definition.
November 27, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Assortment is fine as the def but you already know what I think of it as a grind. Just add a grind after the fodder which suits assortment as an adjective and the clue would be fine. Double duty is frowned upon by Xims and Libs alike.
November 27, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Assortment doing double duty there. If one accepts nounal grinds that is.
November 27, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Def for WP is just wrong. It absolutely ruins the clue for me. So bloody easy to fix too.
November 27, 2025 at 5:12 PM
But no best and don't order a lager and black, that's a woke DEI drink.
November 26, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Very much doubt she's a Friend of Dorothy though.
November 26, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Tpublican is a Yorkshire landlord surely?
November 26, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Brainless too, must be why she never won our hearts and minds.
November 26, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Fairly sure Truss is one of the undead anyway so we would have needed a silver rope to make sure
November 26, 2025 at 5:06 PM
To be fair we didn't lynch them either. I still regret that.
November 26, 2025 at 5:02 PM
To be fair I only spotted it once I'd taken the obviously wrong step of just having ER as the result of the wordplay, as I said to myself ER? RE? I then saw it from the RE and all that was left had to be the def. I then had to work out what was going on after the fact.
November 26, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Hopefully that saved your par score
November 26, 2025 at 3:30 PM
That was the new addition to the secret handshake. Now we have to change it again FFS.
November 26, 2025 at 3:13 PM
I did think the def was nice but the WP was unfairly and erroneously indicated.
November 26, 2025 at 3:06 PM
Thought it was dreadful!
November 26, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Split two of the words and insert -ing or -wards in the first split and and 'of' in the second.
November 26, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Nah yours is lovely mine's only funny in the context of yours.
November 22, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Censorship atrocity? 🤔
November 22, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Or that second clue is sample... 🤔
November 22, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Controversial.
November 22, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Unfortunately I have to agree as although S for small should be jn Chambers it isn't (M medium and XL extra large are though so why not S and L?) and D is short for diamonds the suit not diamond singular. I didn't notice either of these defects while solving and found the structure delightful.
November 22, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Nicely cropped.
November 21, 2025 at 5:55 PM
What the people paying their salaries say they shouldn't report?
November 21, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Grapes are a waste of what should be wine!
November 21, 2025 at 4:33 PM
I actually rather like it.
November 21, 2025 at 4:28 PM