Cupric
@cupric.bsky.social
🏳️⚧️They/Them • 🏳️🌈Bi/Pan+Queer • Software developer by trade. My hobby is, apparently, doing deep dive research into other hobbies and then burning out before I’ve even begun. Hobby du jour: photography!
Mid-nineties here. It’s, like Obama, …, …, …, Biden, Clinton, …, …, …, too many …s for Bluesky, …, …, Bush Jr, Trump.
December 8, 2025 at 1:06 AM
Mid-nineties here. It’s, like Obama, …, …, …, Biden, Clinton, …, …, …, too many …s for Bluesky, …, …, Bush Jr, Trump.
On my phone that “click that” arrow points to the ⋯. Don’t mind if I do, the block button is under there.
December 7, 2025 at 9:00 PM
On my phone that “click that” arrow points to the ⋯. Don’t mind if I do, the block button is under there.
No they won’t. Birthright is the literal text of the Constitution. It has been the de jure policy in place for over 150 years. It’s not up for debate. The real question here is if they decide to cement their illegitimacy and fully commit to placing Trump over the core principles of our nation.
December 7, 2025 at 6:55 AM
No they won’t. Birthright is the literal text of the Constitution. It has been the de jure policy in place for over 150 years. It’s not up for debate. The real question here is if they decide to cement their illegitimacy and fully commit to placing Trump over the core principles of our nation.
Reposted by Cupric
Fundamentally: this means that whatever has motivated a change in policy by Girl Guiding is not about the Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland. It was something else.
December 6, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Fundamentally: this means that whatever has motivated a change in policy by Girl Guiding is not about the Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland. It was something else.
Reposted by Cupric
Trans people without a GRC would have been considered their 'biological' sex for the purpose of the EA regardless of how FWS was decided. So no matter what, trans girl guides would have been 'male' under that Act. If they could be lawfully included notwithstanding that before, they still can be now.
December 6, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Trans people without a GRC would have been considered their 'biological' sex for the purpose of the EA regardless of how FWS was decided. So no matter what, trans girl guides would have been 'male' under that Act. If they could be lawfully included notwithstanding that before, they still can be now.