Graham Smith
@cyberleagle.bsky.social
1.3K followers 110 following 1.5K posts
IT and internet lawyer. Sceptical tech enthusiast. Reposts and links are not endorsements. All views my own. No posts are legal advice. www.cyberleagle.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Graham Smith
colinyeo.bsky.social
Properly and appropriately searing criticism of Jenrick by @stephenkb.bsky.social in his newsletter this morning. Jenrick is obsessed with skin colour as a supposed signal of integration. There's a word for people like that.
ep.ft.com/permalink/em...
cyberleagle.bsky.social
Beware politicians with lists.
Reposted by Graham Smith
samfr.bsky.social
Jenrick now proposing sacking judges he doesn't like. I can just about remember when Conservatives cared about things like the rule of law.
sgfmann.bsky.social
The Daily Telegraph: MI5 kept in dark in China spy trial fiasco #TomorrowsPapersToday
cyberleagle.bsky.social
Things that Art 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights does not say.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
17. Everyone has the right to freedom of a prescribed quantity of opinion and expression at a designated time and place.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
17. Everyone has the right to freedom of a prescribed quantity of opinion and expression at a designated time and place.
Reposted by Graham Smith
cyberleagle.bsky.social
Quite amusing that the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 is listed in the Appendix to the Wolfson Report as a domestic statute covering human rights ground. It wouldn't exist at all but for a series of Strasbourg judgments and the ECHR.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
Quite amusing that the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 is listed in the Appendix to the Wolfson Report as a domestic statute covering human rights ground. It wouldn't exist at all but for a series of Strasbourg judgments and the ECHR.
Reposted by Graham Smith
cyberleagle.bsky.social
Most interesting, thank you. Your point re prior due process was well made - especially pertinent to official notices under statutory ‘trusted flagger’-type schemes. This commentary on Google v Russia focuses on the Pavli concurring opinion, in case of interest. www.cyberleagle.com/2025/09/goog...
<i><span >Google v Russia</span ></i>: a hint of things to come
The outcome of Google’s complaint to the European Court of Human Rights in Google v Russia cannot be considered a surprise. The facts were ...
www.cyberleagle.com
cyberleagle.bsky.social
“When you have a newspaper, you are responsible for what is published in it. When you have a social network, you must be responsible for what is published on it.” >>> Macron opposed to the DSA hosting shield?
jeremycliffe.bsky.social
Macron: "We have been incredibly naive in entrusting our democratic space to social networks that are controlled either by large American entrepreneurs or large Chinese companies whose interests are not at all the survival or proper functioning of our democracies"

defenddemocracy.eu/macron-democ...
"Europeans, let's wake up!" — Defend Democracy
“We have been incredibly naive in entrusting our democratic space to social networks.” President Macron on the occasion of German Unity Day, 3 October 2025.
defenddemocracy.eu
cyberleagle.bsky.social
It's a phrase from ECtHR jurisprudence, describing the threshold test before you can move on to necessity and proportionality. So not really mine! Also said by some judges to be an English law constitutional principle. I'll add some references later.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
Quite. Can we trust Parliament not to pass a blasphemy law, or a law so vague as not to have the quality of law? These things are not quite so simple.
eddwilson.bsky.social
Badenoch: We believe in free speech, but that has to be within the bounds of the law.

So if the law is amended to prevent it, it's no longer acceptable free speech.

That's not exactly a principles-based argument.

#bbclaurak
cyberleagle.bsky.social
I guess that went the way of all mortal flesh with the never-ending split over the EU, a hurricane the effects of which are still being felt.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
The Conservative party used to pride itself on being a broad church, not a sect.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
"In a later interview with GB News, Badenoch said that MPs who did not agree with leaving the ECHR would not be able to stand as a Conservative candidate." >>> You might think the pool of potential candidates was small enough already. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
My approach will pay off eventually, says Kemi Badenoch
The Conservative leader defends her leadership as the party's conference begins in Manchester
www.bbc.co.uk
Reposted by Graham Smith
walterolson.bsky.social
Eugene Volokh has been serializing a new Emory Law Journal article in which he critically examines claims that online media may be regulated on the grounds that it provides an "addictive" experience for users. But the First Amendment allows for no such exception, and we should be glad it doesn't.
Addiction Archives
reason.com
cyberleagle.bsky.social
If you legislate for national security, sooner or later a government will claim that everything is national security. If you legislate for terrorism, sooner or later a government will claim that everything is terrorism. And one day a government will do both.
brandonfriedman.bsky.social
Everyone is trying to have a normal Saturday night and the president's top advisor is on X announcing that civil war is necessary
@StephenM on X: Legal insurrection. The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge. Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life. (There are more local law enforcement officers in Oregon than there are guns and badges in the FBI nationwide). This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers, and the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself.
cyberleagle.bsky.social
The latter, then. bsky.app/profile/jame...
jamesrball.com
Just noticed the Conservatives’ British ICE proposal also involves using mass deployment of facial ID – still an unproven and unreliable technology that particularly struggles with non-white faces – to enable deportations.

Which would inevitably mean false positives leading to detention of citizens
Reposted by Graham Smith
jamesrball.com
Just noticed the Conservatives’ British ICE proposal also involves using mass deployment of facial ID – still an unproven and unreliable technology that particularly struggles with non-white faces – to enable deportations.

Which would inevitably mean false positives leading to detention of citizens