Lovely overview! Great to see other applications mentioned. (I used my visual working memory tools in pigeon navigation: doi.org/10.1371/jour...)

BTW, looks like you already have a journal in mind, but just in case: Behavior Research Methods would be a great venue! link.springer.com/journal/1342...

Hahah, sorry, I didn’t mean “just” as “only socks”! It was an expression of surprise that adding socks and other useful stuff was a genuine possibility. This will forever change out party bags. (Which, honestly, were already quite amazing due to my wife’s creativity.)

Wait, you can just do this?!

*furiously makes notes*

I’m sorry; it sounds very stressful and demoralising. It’s such a terrible illness. Hope this round won’t be as bad as expected, and that you come out the other end.

Such exceptions exist because 1) If enough people get it wrong enough of the time, it becomes accepted. 2) Historical weirdness is often grandfathered in. 3) English is actually three languages in a trench coat.

That fact that it’s the de facto lingua franca is a historical fluke (and a mistake).

Only a native speaker could be so confidently wrong about their own language 😜

For anyone else: the doubling-up rule suggests "focussed" as the correct version. However, in reality both "focussed" and "focused" are both accepted ways of spelling it.

Definitely true for a lot of my work, but at least I produce hand-crafted artisanal research blunders. Instead, this is auto-generated slop that sounds like the early stages of a spin-out company riding the AI bubble.

Regardless, I thought it offered nice context, even if not (as) problematic :)

This is beside your point, but I participated in this and the suggestions were gobshite.

So in addition to all of the objections you rightfully raise, the whole thing they’re testing is absolutely useless.

Also, while making light of this helps ridicule its dimwitted billionaire owner, the fact that Twitter now openly allows and encourages revenge porn is absolutely nuts. (Not to mention legally questionable in many countries: the UK’s intimate image abuse rules explicitly include realistic fakes.)

If I recall correctly, NICE guidelines come with similar warning. I assume it’s a liability thing.

So I looked at NICE to check, and now there’s a whole EULA to agree with: cks.nice.org.uk This one reads more like copyright (and AI?) protection.

This was worthy of clicking on your profile to find bakes 1 and 2. Did not disappoint. Well done! 🤤

Lovely, thanks for sharing! Looks very promising; will definitely consider building one to play around with :)

I respect the self-restraint shown in not naming this variable `big_if_trimmed` 😜 github.com/Rodgers-PAC-...

HOLY WHAAAT, 8k?! These boards do not support that, I’m afraid! But that does have me curious about the ADS1299 and what you’re doing with it, so thanks for that link :)