DamsonEd
@damsoned.bsky.social
530 followers 360 following 1.5K posts
Dr Megan Dixon: teacher, leader and researcher. PhD, Psychology. All things education and research - literacy, English, research into practice, curriculum, SEND. TES columnist. Based in the UK. Often in school, reading. https://meganjanedixon.co.uk
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
damsoned.bsky.social
On the back of this article- a thread of useful places for schools/teachers who are interested in finding out more… as I say, this has been a serious issue for a long time… it would be powerful to get a serious handle on it (with obvious impact on ed outcomes).

www.tes.com/magazine/ana...
What schools are doing to tackle the speech and language ‘crisis’
The number of children with speech and language challenges is soaring. And not all of these pupils have SEND. Experts tell Ellen Peirson-Hagger how in-school intervention is possible - and highly effe...
www.tes.com
damsoned.bsky.social
The opportunity to do something powerful, innovative and special with Ofsted was lost in “group think” and hubris. Now we have a mess of a framework that may possibly do harm.

I can see another car crash coming along with the curriculum rewrite… and another 10 years of gnashing of teeth.
damsoned.bsky.social
We need those with skills in piloting materials/schemes and evaluating them robustly, using tried and tested research methods.

We need people who are deeply knowledgeable about education and deeply experienced- not those with a couple of years in the classroom and then 15 in a think tank….
damsoned.bsky.social
We need experts to do this- I mean those with deep subject knowledge (and qualifications), who have experience writing tried and tested curricula that works, who know how schools function and how school
Improvement works well. We need people with immense skill in examination design….
damsoned.bsky.social
And no doubt the process will be cumbersome.

IMO they should be setting a unit, for 6-8 months, that people can be seconded to. With an open and transparent recruitment process, to assemble the best qualified and most experienced team in the country.

This way we can avoid ideological creep…
damsoned.bsky.social
Nice to meet you too!
damsoned.bsky.social
Ummmmm, the timescales for submitting are so tight, it makes me suspect that they already have some ideas of who/what will be doing the work- I’m afraid.

It is the same lack of transparency we have seen before. 🤷‍♀️
Reposted by DamsonEd
ruthswailes.bsky.social
The timescales on this are interesting. Not being funny, any decent consultant is likely to have little or no availability between now and the deadline. I have 3 days left available in 2026, I know I’m not the only one.
damsoned.bsky.social
I totally agree with your pov.

And you have written it far more eloquently than I could. 😊
damsoned.bsky.social
Great thread here

bsky.app/profile/thep...
thepaulconnolly.bsky.social
Badenoch wants to eliminate ‘rip off degrees’ like English. The usual philistine crap that a degree is just about work. The mission to create the stupidest nation on earth. And counterproductive. Young people will work for years. They’ll retrain endlessly. A degree can help them learn how to learn
Reposted by DamsonEd
thepaulconnolly.bsky.social
Politicians. Stop restricting the potential exposure of young people to learning based on your own philistinism or misguided assumptions about what a ‘class’ of people can or can’t take & thus what ‘path’ they should be on. Let learning & creativity abound, science & arts alike. Stop being so stupid
Reposted by DamsonEd
thepaulconnolly.bsky.social
Badenoch wants to eliminate ‘rip off degrees’ like English. The usual philistine crap that a degree is just about work. The mission to create the stupidest nation on earth. And counterproductive. Young people will work for years. They’ll retrain endlessly. A degree can help them learn how to learn
Reposted by DamsonEd
zackpolanski.bsky.social
Our movement is living rent free in the heads of Telegraph journalists at the moment.

Join me in being ‘a threat to the right that they never saw coming’.

join.greenparty.org.uk
The greens may be the threat that the right never saw coming.
damsoned.bsky.social
Interesting thread below.

Totally agree. Besides which why can’t anyone who wants to go to uni? It’s managed in most other countries. Education at uni is about much more than the subject you are studying.

So sick of the vile ranking and categorising of people.

bsky.app/profile/samf...
samfr.bsky.social
If you want to win over younger voters, telling them they can't go to university is probably not going to help.
Reposted by DamsonEd
samfr.bsky.social
If you want to win over younger voters, telling them they can't go to university is probably not going to help.
Reposted by DamsonEd
george-station-cat.bsky.social
I had found an unaccompanied item

I duly applied the H-O-T protocol

It’s not Hidden
It is Obvious
It is most certainly Typical: typically tasty 🧡

*extra treatos for being so vigilant
Reposted by DamsonEd
warwickmansell.bsky.social
Am a bit surprised this has not generated more interest. Quite rare to see a DfE document setting out details of national curriculum development process, as it will happen after Prof Becky Francis's review and DfE response, expected next week.
Reposted by DamsonEd
hazelmpinner.bsky.social
I paraphrase this all the time in class. Mostly it's "you're using all the correct letters/sounds/ numbers, but not necessarily in the right order." Normally class wide feedback.
damsoned.bsky.social
I want to be able to look at the curriculum design team and think- wow, what an impressive group - they will do a good job.

I am not holding my breath. But suspect I will die feeling incredibly disappointed.
damsoned.bsky.social
They should NOT have commercial interests - for example, it is unacceptable that Ruth Miskin was involved in previous curriculum, and other documents.

It is utterly unethical and immoral to make the development of the NC a commercial, ideological enterprise, lacking in transparency and honour.
damsoned.bsky.social
The DFE should be assembling a specialist team, with expertise in curriculum design, superb subject knowledge (at least PHd level), and teacher specialists. This team should NOT have obvious links to ideological positions, or been involved in writing some of the more disastrous recent policy docs.
damsoned.bsky.social
Firstly, it is by no way evident that these organisations have the expertise or skill set to be able to write this documentation.

Secondly, the NC should NOT be written from an ideological viewpoint.

Thirdly, look at the obvious, and bizarre inaccuracies in the Reading/Writing Frameworks
damsoned.bsky.social
This thread is SO important. The fact that the DFE is tendering for consultants to do this is extremely concerning.

I foresee a situation where commercial interests and quangos like Ambition/ TF/Oak/ EEF with highly ideological viewpoints will be given huge contracts.

bsky.app/profile/warw...
Reposted by DamsonEd
warwickmansell.bsky.social
Piece offers a look back at previous nc reviews. This doesn’t seem first instance of such outsourcing – my 2012 Guardian piece revealed that external adviser Ruth Miskin’s name appeared in doc properties as author of draft of primary English programme of study. www.theguardian.com/education/20...
The new national curriculum: made to order?
New questions are being asked about the framing of the planned primary curriculum
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by DamsonEd
warwickmansell.bsky.social
Very interesting comments under this piece now, including one stating: "If the NC [review] report does not include full exploration of, and citation of, robust critiques of current policies then people will question its independence."