Daniella Lock
@daniellalock.bsky.social
490 followers 370 following 68 posts
Lecturer, KCL Researching UK executive power, political economy, national security and human rights https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/daniella-lock She/her
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
daniellalock.bsky.social
Here I argue the Home Secretary's case that Palestine Action is concerned in terrorism is lacking in evidence, and proscribing the group is disproportionate. It will criminalise a significant proportion of civil society and be counterproductive for maintaining safety.
lrb.co.uk
‘Given the size of Palestine Action and the breadth of support so far expressed for it, proscribing it could lead to a significant proportion of civil society being criminalised, including MPs, journalists and NGOs.’

New on the blog: Daniella Lock on Palestine Action. www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2025/ju...
Daniella Lock | Heavy Power
During a parliamentary debate on the Terrorism Bill in 2000, MPs asked whether the legislation could be used to...
www.lrb.co.uk
Reposted by Daniella Lock
peterwalker99.bsky.social
NEW: Home Office announces planned new anti-protest powers, mainly aimed at pro-Gaza protests like those for Palestine Action. Police will be able to consider the "cumulative impact" of repeated protests and potentially order that they be relocated.
daniellalock.bsky.social
4. This would be the sort of law the Reviewer is meant to act as a bulwalk against in the aftermath of the kind of appalling terrorist attack we have just seen.
daniellalock.bsky.social
3. In giving this public response, the Reviewer risks legitimising a knee-jerk and disproportionate new terrorism law - further eroding the right to protest in the UK after years of it being under attack.
daniellalock.bsky.social
2. By not acknowledging this, the Independent Reviewer appeared to be describing a new regime that would incentivise governments to interpret terrorism law even more broadly where they wanted a reason to ban protests.
daniellalock.bsky.social
1. The discussion made no acknowledgement that the huge burden on police in protests currently is due to a political decision to proscribe a direct action group - huge numbers of police are now required to carry out mass arrests of peaceful protesters under terrorism law.
daniellalock.bsky.social
The Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation's comments on radio 4 today were worrying. He refers to a potential need for legal changes to enable the banning of protests to alleviate the burden on police for national security reasons, while discussing the defend our juries protest on Saturday.
Reposted by Daniella Lock
paulfscott.bsky.social
'The UK Home Office demanded in early September that Apple create a means to allow officials access to encrypted cloud backups, but stipulated that the order applied only to British citizens’ data, according to people briefed on the matter.' www.ft.com/content/d101...
UK makes new attempt to access Apple cloud data
Order issued in September comes after Trump administration said London had backed down in fight over encryption
www.ft.com
daniellalock.bsky.social
The article further argues that Labour seems to be following a similar trend in evading democratic scrutiny, despite election commitments to empowering Parliament. Its process for proscribing Palestine Action is a good example, particularly its withholding of information requested by the ISC 5/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
All govs manipulate the legislative process, and these mechanisms are not new. However, the article argues that the repeated reliance on them in relation to such a democratically significant set of legislation helped create a backdoor to facilitate Executive empowerment in the areas examined 4/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
Mechanisms of parliamentary marginalisation:
1: Avoiding pre-legislative scrutiny
2: Exploiting the parliamentary timetable
3: Legislative overload
4. Excessive reliance on skeleton bills
5. Failure to provide crucial info to parliament
6. Reliance on spurious claims in justifying changes 3/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
The relevant powers examined are those interfering with fundamental rights - including labour rights, protest rights, the right to not be tortured, and the right to liberty (including to have a judge decide whether the state detaining you is reasonable) 2/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
My article 'Backdoor Executive Empowerment' is now available open access published by Legal Studies. The paper identifies 6 mechanisms the last UK Government used to obstruct democratic scrutiny of new changes it introduced to expand executive powers 🧵1/5

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Backdoor Executive Empowerment | Legal Studies | Cambridge Core
Backdoor Executive Empowerment
www.cambridge.org
daniellalock.bsky.social
The article further argues that Labour seems to be following a similar trend in evading democratic scrutiny, despite election commitments to empowering Parliament. Its process for proscribing Palestine Action is a good example, particularly its withholding of information requested by the ISC 5/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
All govs manipulate the legislative process, and these mechanisms are not new. However, the article argues that the repeated reliance on them in relation to such a democratically significant set of legislation helped create a backdoor to facilitate Executive empowerment in the areas examined 4/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
Mechanisms of parliamentary marginalisation:
1: Avoiding pre-legislative scrutiny
2: Exploiting the parliamentary timetable
3: Legislative overload
4. Excessive reliance on skeleton bills
5. Failure to provide crucial info to parliament
6. Reliance on spurious claims in justifying changes 3/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
The relevant powers examined are those interfering with fundamental rights - including labour rights, protest rights, the right to not be tortured, and the right to liberty (including to have a judge decide whether the state detaining you is reasonable) 2/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
The article further argues that Labour seems to be following a similar trend in evading democratic scrutiny, despite election commitments to empowering Parliament. Its process for proscribing Palestine Action is a good example, particularly its withholding of information requested by the ISC 5/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
All govs manipulate the legislative process, and these mechanisms are not new. However, the article argues that the repeated reliance on them in relation to such a democratically significant set of legislation helped create a backdoor to facilitate Executive empowerment in the areas examined 4/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
Mechanisms of parliamentary marginalisation:
1: Avoiding pre-legislative scrutiny
2: Exploiting the parliamentary timetable
3: Legislative overload
4. Excessive reliance on skeleton bills
5. Failure to provide crucial info to parliament
6. Reliance on spurious claims in justifying changes 3/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
The relevant powers examined are those interfering with fundamental rights - including those related to labour rights, protest rights, the right to not be tortured, and the right to liberty (including to have a judge decide whether the state detaining you is reasonable) 2/5
daniellalock.bsky.social
- TBI health policy director Charlotte Refsum given an official role to work on the government's ten year NHS plan
- TBI's Tom Westgarth being brought in to develop Starmer's AI Opportunities Action Plan while still on the TBI payroll 2/2
daniellalock.bsky.social
A great read on the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), whose last summer party was held at McKinsey's HQ and co-hosted by ex-McKinsey current chair of NHS England. It includes important info on the revolving door between this tech and petrostate-funded think tank and Starmer's government, including - 1/2
halcyene.bsky.social
Illuminating read on the Tony Blair Institute: "an organisation unusually close to the British government, able to lobby ministers directly, and which holds joint retreats with Oracle and is willing to engage in “tech sales” with governments in the rest of the world."
Inside the Tony Blair Institute
Who really benefits from the former PM’s tech evangelism?
www.newstatesman.com