Newsletter, speaking and advisory work: http://davidzipper.com
"For every life that the heaviest 1% of SUVs and trucks save, there are more than a dozen lives lost in other vehicles."
Well worth your time: www.economist.com/interactive/...
I can’t think of a better way to pursue abundant transportation than densification.
I can’t think of a better way to pursue abundant transportation than densification.
Closer destinations --> Fewer miles driven --> Less spent on gas, car maintenance, etc
Columbus, OH is a model.
Closer destinations --> Fewer miles driven --> Less spent on gas, car maintenance, etc
Columbus, OH is a model.
As one source said, “Why waste taxpayer money building transit no one will use?”
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
As one source said, “Why waste taxpayer money building transit no one will use?”
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
In dense New York City, transportation consumes half as much of residents’ income as in Houston.
In dense New York City, transportation consumes half as much of residents’ income as in Houston.
When destinations are closer:
- Fewer miles driven (save $)
- Easier to take transit/bike/walk (save $$)
- Families might get by with one car instead of two (save $$$)
When destinations are closer:
- Fewer miles driven (save $)
- Easier to take transit/bike/walk (save $$)
- Families might get by with one car instead of two (save $$$)
It’s a laudable vision. But as I argued here, the meaning of “abundant transportation” has been murky. (More transit? Great. More cars? Not so much.)
It’s a laudable vision. But as I argued here, the meaning of “abundant transportation” has been murky. (More transit? Great. More cars? Not so much.)