Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
@diegoreinero.bsky.social
1K followers 380 following 35 posts
MindCORE postdoctoral research fellow @Penn studying how moral and political views change through conversations and social networks
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
I'm excited to share the news that our climate change project won the @spspnews.bsky.social Robert Cialdini Prize for a "paper that uses field methods and demonstrates the relevance of social psychology to outside groups and communities"!

You can read it here: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
diegoreinero.bsky.social
We're accepting poster & data blitz abstract submissions from all career stages. If your work is broadly related to morality, you should apply! We welcome a wide range of topics and approaches.

Submit here: spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2026-p...

Deadline to submit an abstract: Oct. 23.
2026 Preconference Submission Portal
Use this submission form for all preconference submissions. Select your preconference first as this may change submission fields. The submission guide can be found here . You may submit to multi...
spsp.wufoo.com
diegoreinero.bsky.social
🚨Excited to announce the full-day Moral Psychology pre-conference at #SPSP2026!

We sold out last year, and with this year’s incredible speaker lineup, we expect the same.

Submit your poster or data blitz abstract by Oct. 23! spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2026-p... There’s a best poster award!
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
asinclair.bsky.social
🌟 Excited to share that I'm recruiting PhD students in Psychology for my new lab at Rice University this cycle (Signal boost appreciated!)

To learn more, check out the Learning & Behavior Change Lab website:
www.sinclairlab-rice.com

Applications are due Dec 1st: psychology.rice.edu/graduate/pro...
Sinclair Lab
The Learning & Behavior Change Lab at Rice University, directed by Dr. Sinclair
www.sinclairlab-rice.com
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
asinclair.bsky.social
In this @pnas.org Letter, we respond to a comment on our paper about behavioral interventions to motivate action on climate change. In new analyses exploring individual differences, we find that our leading interventions were effective across the political spectrum. 🧵⤵️
www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10....
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
markthornton.bsky.social
The psych job market may not be dead... but it is gravely injured 😬 So far it's looking like the Trump administration's attacks on higher ed/research are going to have more than 2x the impact on the job market as the covid-19 pandemic. #psychjobs #neurojobs #academicjobs
Bar plot showing the number of psychology jobs posted each year by area. There are major dips in 2020 due to covid, and in 2025 (now).
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
asinclair.bsky.social
In this letter in @pnas.org, we respond to a comment on our recent paper.

Although multiple factors shape whether we act on our intentions, intentions are valuable precursors of behavior that can guide the iterative development of behavior change interventions.

www.pnas.org/doi/epub/10....
diegoreinero.bsky.social
Cool new paper in PNAS from @vanessachg.bsky.social et al. When it comes to moral dilemmas, LLM's:

1) are more altruistic than humans
2) exhibit a stronger omission bias than humans
3) are biased toward answering "no"

These biases may come from fine-tuning.

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
www.pnas.org
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
diegoreinero.bsky.social
New paper suggests economists’ political preferences may influence their writing/work.

E.g., Papers on the left imply a higher optimal top tax rate (77%) vs. ones on the right (60%), though note our actual federal top tax rate is just 37%.

What should we takeaway?

academic.oup.com/ej/article/1...
Political Language in Economics
Abstract. Does academic writing in economics reflect the political orientation of economists? We use machine learning to measure partisanship in academic e
academic.oup.com
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
diegoreinero.bsky.social
That being said, scientists are people too. Read Helen Longino's "Science as Social Knowledge" for a nice discussion of the inherent subjectivity of science. jstor.org/stable/j.ctv....

So we shouldn't be that surprised by this latest econ paper's finding.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry on JSTOR
Conventional wisdom has it that the sciences, properly pursued, constitute a pure, value-free method of obtaining knowledge about the natural world. In light o...
jstor.org
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
tomcostello.bsky.social
🚨New WP🚨

Can AI do "deep canvassing"—the time-intensive, empathic persuasive dialogues that durably reduce prejudice when done by humans?

Spoiler: Yes! We find durable reduction in prejudice toward undocumented immigrants

LLMs make deep canvassing possible at massive scale
osf.io/preprints/os...
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
danielgilbert.bsky.social
Since 1954, "The Handbook of Social Psychology" has been the field’s most authoritative reference work, and today is the launch of the 6th edition with 50 new chapters by 100 leading scholars. Best news? The HSP is now an open-access public resource—free to read, download, and share. the-hsp.com
Cover of the Handbook of Social Psychology 6th edition 2025
diegoreinero.bsky.social
🚨Excited to see our new paper out in @pnas.org led by @asinclair.bsky.social!🚨

We tested 17 psychological interventions head-to-head in a “tournament” to see what motivated people to take action and share info about climate change.

Winners depicted here for brevity; read our paper for details!
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
dorsaamir.bsky.social
Wanted to share a handy little resource with you all (especially those in dev psych) — my lab & I made a "journal submission cheat sheet" that summarizes article types, word limits, & other requirements for the journals we typically submit to. Link below 👇🏼
docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
mmitchell.bsky.social
👉 👈 Meta announced that they're changing their models to reduce "left-leaning [political] bias"--that means leaning them to the political "right". Lots to unpack about what that might mean. So I ran a quick "shot in the dark" study...and found a *political right* bias in Meta models. Some notes.🧵
Barchart showing meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B, meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B, meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct. Each model has two bars, a blue one saying PRO-LEFT and a red one saying PRO-RIGHT. The PRO-RIGHT bars on higher than the PRO-LEFT in all of them.
diegoreinero.bsky.social
Interesting! Where did Meta announce this? Is it from this blog post re: this section here? ai.meta.com/blog/llama-4...
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
m-b-petersen.bsky.social
This statement from the NSF is insane.

Science is, in essence, designed to separate the true from the false.

Understanding how falsehoods spread is key to the scientific endeavor. It is not a violation of free speech to be proven wrong.
Reposted by Diego Reinero, Ph.D.
lkfazio.bsky.social
Can confirm that my NSF grant "How False Beliefs Form & How to Correct Them" was cancelled today because it is "not in alignment with current NSF priorities" Shocking that understanding how people are misled by false information is now a forbidden topic. Our work will continue but at a smaller scale
rebekahtromble.bsky.social
NSF has posted an “update on priorities.”

They’re canceling all “DEI and misinformation/disinformation” grants.

And the guidance on how to fulfill the longstanding, legally mandated Broadening Participation requirement is utterly incoherent.

www.nsf.gov/updates-on-p...
Updates on NSF Priorities
www.nsf.gov
diegoreinero.bsky.social
Moral Psych community: @jowylie.bsky.social & I will be organizing the pre-con at SPSP again! This past year was sold-out and we expect next year to be even bigger!

Who do you YOU want to hear from next year? Recommend a speaker with this quick form: tinyurl.com/moralpsychrecs
diegoreinero.bsky.social
Sounds stressful! The data showed speeding was rare (only 3.4% of the time) so sounds like you got a special one haha. Buckle up!
diegoreinero.bsky.social
Plus nice commentary by Dean Knox & Jonathan Mummolo emphasizing that since actual speeding was rare (3.4% of data), racial disparity is even larger. I.e., denominator should be conditional on speeding

Paper: science.org/doi/full/10....
Commentary: science.org/doi/10.1126/...
diegoreinero.bsky.social
Using GPS data from 220,000+ Lyft drivers in Florida to look at actual speeding behavior (not just police reports), Aggarwal et al find:

White & Minority drivers drive similarly, BUT minority drivers were 33% more likely to be cited for speeding + paid 34% more money in fines.