The architect must have been thinking "this is how a chef feels when they order the fillet mignon well done"

The symbol is hungry so it wants to eat the bigger number and has opened its jaws towards that one.

Oh it's done the princess of Wales now so ofcom have launched an urgent investigation.

Truly, semantics are what really matters. The other people (who are definitely fun at parties) replying to this told me so.

Ah, I see.
Yeah then odds running lower.

So grateful!

It's in the first citation I gave that the patient's hymen was in tact on going into labour.

And whilst we have heard of all the ways a hymen is broken that have nothing to do with virginity I'm not sure there's been a case the other way round?

So I'd give it even odds.

BUT someone did get pregnant from being shot in the belly with a bullet that had already passed through a testicle, so there is that.

It is truly fantastic

THANK YOU

I decided to reread and this citation is actually correspondence of the original case report, which is D A Verkuyl. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Sep and I can't get.

But if someone else can, please let me know if it contains the words I remember: "some cattle changed hands to show no hard feelings"

The citation, for anyone who wants it is:

D A Hicks. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Apr.

It's a wild read

Fine. Grok is pretending to be enthusiastic about doing so.

Happy, Dave?

Surely the charge to get them for is the Protection of Children act 1978

1) it is an offence for a person—

(a)to take, or permit to be taken [or to make], any indecent photograph [or pseudo-photograph] of a child.; or

(b)to distribute or show such indecent photographs [or pseudo-photographs]

Grok. People are taking real images of minors to it and asking it to remove their clothes. Grok is enthusiastically doing so.

Except... Ukraine. Need to keep America on side.