doinkboy
@doinkboy.bsky.social
Social Science Data Analysis (especially Dyadic, Mediation, SEM; davidakenny.net) and My Twisted Take on Political & Cultural Topics; Reposts Are Not Necessarily Endorsements
One myth about empathy not included is that people know how empathic they are. Bill Ickes has shown no significant correlation has been found between the scores on various empathy scales and the measurement of empathic accuracy.
December 16, 2025 at 2:48 PM
One myth about empathy not included is that people know how empathic they are. Bill Ickes has shown no significant correlation has been found between the scores on various empathy scales and the measurement of empathic accuracy.
Reposted by doinkboy
I agree with you, but apparently Tim did predict it and for me it was also non-surprising because I read Drew Bailey's and John Protzko's work where this is a recurring pattern. I think it's valuable work, because obviously smart people and workable theories make different predictions.
December 3, 2025 at 12:30 PM
I agree with you, but apparently Tim did predict it and for me it was also non-surprising because I read Drew Bailey's and John Protzko's work where this is a recurring pattern. I think it's valuable work, because obviously smart people and workable theories make different predictions.
One of my all-time favorite YouTube videos. Never fully appreciated Prince before viewing it.
November 23, 2025 at 2:01 AM
One of my all-time favorite YouTube videos. Never fully appreciated Prince before viewing it.
Reposted by doinkboy
Reposted by doinkboy
* We should not rely on meta-analysis or Cochrane to take out bad papers, publishers should do this - do better screening before they get published.
* Some Cochrane reviews still contain works from authors in the top 10 of the Retraction Watch Leaderboard.
#IRICSydney
* Some Cochrane reviews still contain works from authors in the top 10 of the Retraction Watch Leaderboard.
#IRICSydney
November 17, 2025 at 1:32 AM
* We should not rely on meta-analysis or Cochrane to take out bad papers, publishers should do this - do better screening before they get published.
* Some Cochrane reviews still contain works from authors in the top 10 of the Retraction Watch Leaderboard.
#IRICSydney
* Some Cochrane reviews still contain works from authors in the top 10 of the Retraction Watch Leaderboard.
#IRICSydney
Reposted by doinkboy
#couples #psychologicalwellbeing #maritalconflict
#IARR #academicsky
You can read it here: doi.org/10.1111/pere...
#IARR #academicsky
You can read it here: doi.org/10.1111/pere...
Longitudinal dyadic interplay between marital conflict and psychological well‐being in couples: The moderating roles of wives' employment
This study examined longitudinal dyadic and within-partner associations among self-esteem, subjective happiness, and marital conflict in married couples, with a possible moderating role of wives' emp....
doi.org
November 11, 2025 at 8:15 PM
#couples #psychologicalwellbeing #maritalconflict
#IARR #academicsky
You can read it here: doi.org/10.1111/pere...
#IARR #academicsky
You can read it here: doi.org/10.1111/pere...
Reposted by doinkboy
IRT often feels like one hot fever dream where everybody tries to hide the fact that it's just a nonlinear factor model. I had friends who weren't trained in it who essentially picked up that it had magic properties that factor models don't.
November 8, 2025 at 5:40 AM
IRT often feels like one hot fever dream where everybody tries to hide the fact that it's just a nonlinear factor model. I had friends who weren't trained in it who essentially picked up that it had magic properties that factor models don't.
Shouldn't people be impressed that you got the effect with an N of 34? Is it not a waste of resources, including participant resouces, to have unnecessarily large sample sizes?
November 7, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Shouldn't people be impressed that you got the effect with an N of 34? Is it not a waste of resources, including participant resouces, to have unnecessarily large sample sizes?