Mike Dombroski
Mike Dombroski
@dombroskimike.bsky.social
Been blogging and commenting on climate, energy and media for over a decade.

https://gravatar.com/canmane
🙄
I've talked to mutuals of Lauren Southern.. she isn't authentic.
Also, watch her testimony before Canada's Parliament. She was awesome!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVdl...
December 31, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
Frank Parlato just challenged Bullyville’s James McGibney to a public debate on the Jerry Sandusky case. “Bring your facts, James—I’ll bring the truth.” #FrankParlato #Bullyville #DebateChallenge
https://loom.ly/dTnLqSg
“Buy a domain that spells his name right, James.” #FrankReport
November 10, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
Here's my pinned thread. There's lots of great summaries and interviews, videos and an astounding (probably 100 hours by now) podcast series. Best ongoing mini-series on the internet!

x.com/DombroskiMik...
Mike Dombroski (aka Canman) on X: "Sandusky Trutherism Summary: https://t.co/mFCQLKTiUW Listing of Accomplished People Investigating the Case https://t.co/fOoQXipiAH Original Site https://t.co/rbtwavyAWl Epic Paradigm Shifting Podcast Series https://t.co/vfhdwk7KT4 Press Conference https://t.co/xbfvbHzmUi" / X
Sandusky Trutherism Summary: https://t.co/mFCQLKTiUW Listing of Accomplished People Investigating the Case https://t.co/fOoQXipiAH Original Site https://t.co/rbtwavyAWl Epic Paradigm Shifting Podcast Series https://t.co/vfhdwk7KT4 Press Conference https://t.co/xbfvbHzmUi
x.com
November 3, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
You bet! I've got tons of links on my pinned tweet thread on X. We can bring receipts to to debunk anyone who brings up old narrative talking points and they can't counter with anything because the prosecutors and journalists on their side such as Pulitzer winner Sara Ganim have run for the hills!
November 3, 2025 at 11:19 PM
BlueSky allows you to take the blue pill and scurry away.
October 19, 2025 at 11:13 PM
How Frank Fina & Joe McGettigan profited from putting Jerry Sandusky in prison
open.substack.com/pub/ralphcip...
How Frank Fina & Joe McGettigan profited from putting Jerry Sandusky in prison
New appeal says Sandusky's prosecutors secretly controlled a $12 million trust fund set up for the highest paid alleged 'victim' at Penn State
open.substack.com
October 11, 2025 at 11:16 PM
I'd call it bluepillism.

What is Blueskyism?
www.natesilver.net/p/what-is-bl...
What is Blueskyism?
And why is it so toxic for political persuasion?
www.natesilver.net
September 9, 2025 at 11:11 AM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
I have zero restrictions on being around anyone and doubt that anyone despises me.

No one on this thread loves pedophiles.

That's the entire point.

Sandusky is innocent
July 22, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
John Ziegler deserves a ‪@pulitzerprizes.bsky.social‬ for his work on the Sandusky case.

@pulitzercenter.bsky.social‬ needs to atone for its disgraceful promotion of Sara Ganim!
July 19, 2025 at 3:40 PM
July 19, 2025 at 2:26 PM
I suppose i might on a very superficial level to simpleminded, blue pill popping, logic challenged denizens of BlueSky getting their outrage rush.
I suppose i might on a very superficial level to simpleminded, blue pill popping, logic challenged denizens of BlueSky getting their outrage rush.
July 17, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
I can't believe a senior editor at the Atlantic wouldn't at least have some curiosity about this story .. and it's a great story! If it ever catches on (there are documentarians looking into it), you'll be a laughing stock.
July 14, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
Correct. If anything the two "eye witnesses" should have hurt the prosecution's case.
Unfortunately, between the judge making mind boggling rulings, inadequate defense counsel and the jury being tainted by the media circus, nothing that happened in court mattered.
Guilt was predetermined.
July 14, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
No, when the press and prosecutors get something this wrong in a moral panic, it needs to get exposed and corrected!

Also, it's a great story -- worthy of John Grisham or Vince Gilligan.
July 14, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
What other evidence? You came to this thread.
July 14, 2025 at 2:53 PM
This is the level of discourse from a senior editor at the Atlantic?
I can’t imagine being as gullible as you, so I’m guessing you’re just a pedophile yourself
July 14, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
I don't see any evidence for that, but Mark Steyn has been posting for a decade about a real pedophile scandal that's been covered up by left wing UK politicians.

x.com/MarkSteynOnl...
Mark Steyn on X: ""What is remarkable about this is the way it's all hiding in plain sight..." Full episode on the enablers of evil here: https://t.co/ZvDzv38Bmj special guests: @officialsammyuk @SamanthaTaghoy @AllisonPearson https://t.co/t5VEMJMRIp" / X
"What is remarkable about this is the way it's all hiding in plain sight..." Full episode on the enablers of evil here: https://t.co/ZvDzv38Bmj special guests: @officialsammyuk @SamanthaTaghoy @AllisonPearson https://t.co/t5VEMJMRIp
x.com
July 14, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
That the biggest sports scandal of our time was mass hysteria from a moral panic and that a man was demonized to the whole world by a false illegally leaked grand jury presentment is a worthy pursuit even if it turns out to be a lost cause.
July 14, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Blue pills are popular at BlueSky.
July 14, 2025 at 1:14 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
Here's a post that is relevant to all the charges he was convicted on. It goes through every accuser, one by one:

archive.skeptic.com/archive/read...
Trial by Therapy: The Jerry Sandusky Case Revisited
Frederick Crews reviews Mark Pendergrast’s book The Most Hated Man in America: Jerry Sandusky and the Rush to Judgment: a sustained, comprehensive case—based on detailed evidence and reasoning—that Je...
archive.skeptic.com
July 14, 2025 at 12:45 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
This press conference did illustrate that Mike McQueary's testimony was not credible and cut through a lot of the mass hysteria of this case.
July 14, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Reposted by Mike Dombroski
It turned out like all the appeals Sandusky has made in Pennsylvania where judges are elected and have to face reelection. At this appeal the judge, John M. Cleland, was also the trial judge!
July 14, 2025 at 12:34 PM