Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

In light of the FCC's role in the imposition of Trumpian cancel culture in the US, Canadians should consider how they feel about a CBC answerable to a Trump imitator and a CRTC staffed by his appointees. The time to reduce government power is when the decent guys have it - after that, it's too late.

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 20d

ICYMI

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 20d

New post: no law, I'm afraid, but an attempt to think through what the Last Night of the Proms and the "Unite the Kingdom" protest tell us about the different ways in which love of country manifests itself.

Land of Hope and Worry

On love of country

doubleaspect.blog

1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 20d

New post: no law, I'm afraid, but an attempt to think through what the Last Night of the Proms and the "Unite the Kingdom" protest tell us about the different ways in which love of country manifests itself.

Land of Hope and Worry

On love of country

doubleaspect.blog

3

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 21d

I don't think I have to pretend anything. It's enough to judge the facts as they arise. There is, right now, far too much judging of people based on their real or presumed belonging to some shapeless but hostile "them". It's no different from wokeness, and I want none of that.

2

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 21d

I'm not aware of Paolo having sat on a Canadian hiring committee. I think this is a matter of basic individualism, which conservatives used to believe in until five minutes ago, but sure, I'd rather be a Menshevik than a Bannonite.

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 21d

I don't presume bad faith absent actual evidence.

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 22d

En rappel: les arguments à l'appui de la contestation de la nomination du juge Robert Leckey à la Cour supérieure du Québec ne sont pas sérieux. doubleaspect.blog/2025/09/15/n...

N’importe quoi

La contestation de la nomination du juge Leckey à la Cour supérieure est sans fondement

doubleaspect.blog

Reposted by Leonid Sirota

Emmett Macfarlane 🇨🇦 @emmettmacfarlane.com · 22d

Just learning of this patently ridiculous legal challenge now - this thread is spot-on.

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

Some judicial appointment shenanigans to finish your week in style! Justice Leckey's appointment to the Quebec Superior Court is being challenged by a group led by Daniel Turp. Some thoughts below. Tl;dr: this has no legs. 1/5 www.lapresse.ca/actualites/2...

Cour supérieure du Québec | Un groupe conteste la nomination du juge Robert Lackey

Un groupe conteste la récente nomination du juge Robert Leckey à la Cour supérieure du Québec, affirmant qu’elle était illégale et anticonstitutionnelle.

www.lapresse.ca

2 6

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 22d

Nouveau billet, reprenant en français mon argument à l'effet que la nomination du juge Leckey à la Cour supérieure du Québec est valide et le recours qui cherche à la contester, sans fondement. doubleaspect.blog/2025/09/15/n...

N’importe quoi

La contestation de la nomination du juge Leckey à la Cour supérieure est sans fondement

doubleaspect.blog

1 2

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

PS: The argument to come. www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMuh...

The Castle - The Vibe

YouTube video by thecomputerdude24 TV & Movie Clips

www.youtube.com

1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

What's left is an argument about vibes. It was bad enough when that carried the day in the Nadon affair, but there was a plausible textual argument there too. Not so here. I hope this goes nowhere fast. 5/5

1 2

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

Now statute: the Judges Act is where 10-year requirement comes from, but it can be met by bar membership in "any province", not necessarily the one from which the judge is ultimately appointed. The French text is a smidgen less explicit, but to the same effect. 4/5

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

That's not exactly the case. Consider the Constitution first. The relevant provision is s 98 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Neither it nor the other provisions in the Judicature part specify a minimum length of bar membership. 3/5

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

Key issue: Justice Leckey had only 7 years' standing at the Quebec Bar — although I take it that he'd been called to the Ontario bar for rather longer. (I've been unable to find how many.) The claim and even the article seem to assume that 10 is the constitutional and statutory requirement. But! 2/5

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 23d

Some judicial appointment shenanigans to finish your week in style! Justice Leckey's appointment to the Quebec Superior Court is being challenged by a group led by Daniel Turp. Some thoughts below. Tl;dr: this has no legs. 1/5 www.lapresse.ca/actualites/2...

Cour supérieure du Québec | Un groupe conteste la nomination du juge Robert Lackey

Un groupe conteste la récente nomination du juge Robert Leckey à la Cour supérieure du Québec, affirmant qu’elle était illégale et anticonstitutionnelle.

www.lapresse.ca

1 2 3

Reposted by Leonid Sirota

Reading Law School @unirdg-law.bsky.social · 27d

Next week, a group of our staff will be taking part in the Reading Legal Walk 2025 to help raise funds for advice charities in Reading. If you are able to support us, please go to: londonlegalsupporttrust.enthuse.com/pf/universit.... We are grateful for any contribution!

Reading Legal Walk 2025

Thank you for supporting our team for the Reading Legal Walk 2025. Our team is: Marzia Briel, Nora Honkala, Leonid Sirota, Frances Hamilton and Kieran Lee Marshall We are taking on a sponsored 10km wa

londonlegalsupporttrust.enthuse.com

1 1

Reposted by Leonid Sirota

Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · 27d

At heart religious toleration was about sharing civic space with those who disagreed about the most fundamental questions, who rejected divinity and truth, who spread heresy and threatened the eternal damnation of immortal souls. The stakes could not have been higher.
2/

1 2 11

Reposted by Leonid Sirota

Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · 27d

It may be hard to fully comprehend what principles of religious toleration demanded, but it matters. If a religious adherent can be asked to tolerate those of another faith, we should be able to tolerate those who merely disagree about mere matters of politics or policy. 3/3

1 2 10

Reposted by Leonid Sirota

Jonathan H. Adler @jadler1969.bsky.social · 27d

At moments like this it is worth considering and reflecting upon the history and principles of religious toleration. Such tolerance was not about being nice to people with different customs or holidays, but something far more profound.
1/

1 5 16

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 28d

David Dyzenhaus thinks that originalism is illiberal: verfassungsblog.de/os5-snake-ch.... On his view, I am basically the same as Vermeule. So you'll forgive me for seeing any talk of proscribing ideological positions in the academy as an excuse that can just as well serve to get rid of me.

The Snake Charmers

verfassungsblog.de

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 28d

The scope of what counts as legitimising fascism/racism/etc has been interpreted very broadly, as indeed has the scope of these words themselves. There are people who thought, or said, that I was a racist for criticising the appointment of an Indigenous, but in my view unqualified, judge to the SCC.

1 1

Leonid Sirota @doubleaspect.blog · 28d

I've family members who were murdered in the Holocaust... I don't think we need to go there. I still worry about how people interpret "legitimising", because there's been plenty of bad faith in that regard in the last few years.

1 1