David Barner
@drbarner.bsky.social
3.5K followers 810 following 210 posts
Professor of Psychology at UCSD interested in language & conceptual development.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
drbarner.bsky.social
But it’s not just psych. It also predates the recent AI boom, driven by computer science being impacted at the UG level. Deans want to redirect students from compsci to linguistics, psych, cogsci - wherever they can. It’s not ending well for UGs in compsci & probably won’t end well elsewhere.
drbarner.bsky.social
Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like the most important pure research in this area happened 20 years ago, and what’s new now are scaling and applications. So it seems like anyone wanting to hire in this area maybe should have done so in the 80s.
Reposted by David Barner
martinhebart.bsky.social
Today I had a curious encounter with my 4-yo son. He told me he discovered that his Batman action figure could switch the Batman logo to something else. He showed me, touched its arm, shook it and said: “there, it changed.”
The thing is: the logo is fixed and cannot change. So what had happened?
Reposted by David Barner
Reposted by David Barner
alisabokulich.bsky.social
Philosophy Dept @ U of Toronto invites applications for 7 #philjobs incl

Asst Prof – Metaphysics & Epistemology, St. George Campus (deadline: Nov 3): jobs.utoronto.ca/job/Toronto-...

Asst Prof – Philosophy & Statistics, St. George Campus (deadline: Nov 4): jobs.utoronto.ca/job/Toronto-...
#philsci
Assistant Professor - Metaphysics and Epistemology
Assistant Professor - Metaphysics and Epistemology
jobs.utoronto.ca
Reposted by David Barner
kostaboskovic.bsky.social
Thrilled to have another CogSci in the books!

Curious about how children learn what age is? Check out my poster with @drbarner.bsky.social here: qr.codes/yjFi54
Reposted by David Barner
improvingpsych.org
PsyArXiv is seeking new moderators to help combat an increase in AI submissions! If you've ever posted a preprint to PsyArXiv, please consider joining. Minimum commitment 1h/month, there's a training session this Monday @ 1pm ET. More info here: forms.gle/9LB1rEtxHAeZ... #PsychSciSky
Expression of Interest in Serving as a PsyArXiv Moderator
As you might have heard, PsyArXiv is having some issues with an increase in low-quality submissions, ranging from AI generated manuscripts to inflate citation metrics, incoherent or nonsensical docume...
forms.gle
drbarner.bsky.social
4/ If you're wanting to try this and have troubles let me know and I can try to help.
drbarner.bsky.social
4/ I can't recommend one particular video (& I can tell you that the video I'll share leaves out critical info at critical steps), but here's one: www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7W1...
How to Supervise an iPhone with Apple Configurator in 2025
YouTube video by Gertrude App
www.youtube.com
drbarner.bsky.social
3/ This thing is powerful: You can exclude apps, including the app store, & create whatever kind of device you want. IMO it's what the screentime app SHOULD be (& easily could be if Apple really wanted to allow you to limit screentime for kids).
drbarner.bsky.social
2/ The solution is Apple Configurator. It's meant for industry control over employee devices but works very well for parental controls or creating a dumb phone for adults. Configurator isn't super user friendly, but a day on Youtube did the trick, & my phone no longer dominates my consciousness.
drbarner.bsky.social
1/ Dunno if anyone else cares about this, but a few years ago it became impossible to dumb-phone your iPhone using screentime settings (e.g., to remove web browser, etc.) b/c Safari just reappears in the App library. I recently discovered a way around this that cut my screen time by 2-3 hours a day.
drbarner.bsky.social
She does think there are innate conceptual resources - proto-concepts. Just no innate concepts!
drbarner.bsky.social
Susan Carey mic-drop at #cogsci2025. "There are no innate concepts: Discuss"
Reposted by David Barner
junyi.bsky.social
Next Monday 6/30, join us for session 3 on 🛠️Problem Solving🧠 !

Register here for Zoom link: stanford.zoom.us/meeting/regi...

Attending CogSci in person this July? Submit an abstract to showcase your work at our poster session! forms.gle/SHFChMAAReto...
junyi.bsky.social
🧩 On problem solving (6/30, 2-3pm PT): Kelsey Allen, @bonan.bsky.social @ranjaykrishna.bsky.social
Reposted by David Barner
Reposted by David Barner
cogscisociety.bsky.social
🚨 5 days left!

Submit your proposal for the ✨Broadening Participation in Cognitive Science✨ initiative.
Grants up to $5,000 to support projects that advance accessibility & inclusion in #CogSci

🗓️Deadline: June 13
🔗 cognitivesciencesociety.org/broadening-p...
cogscisociety.bsky.social
We're inviting proposals for the ✨Broadening Participation in Cognitive Science initiative✨, with grants of up to $5,000 to support events or projects that increase accessibility and inclusion in #CogSci

Deadline: June 13 🗓️

Learn more and apply at cognitivesciencesociety.org/broadening-p...
Broadening Participation in Cognitive Science. Apply Today!
Reposted by David Barner
junyi.bsky.social
Delighted to announce our CogSci '25 workshop at the interface between cognitive science and design 🧠🖌️!

We're calling it: 🏺Minds in the Making🏺
🔗 minds-making.github.io

June – July 2024, free & open to the public
(all career stages, all disciplines)
drbarner.bsky.social
We conclude that smaller bases may be just as easy to learn as larger ones despite the more complex rule structure & therefore that if kids were trained on smaller bases they might learn rules earlier in development. Stay tuned for a study by Sebastian in Phil.Transactions RSB that explores this!
drbarner.bsky.social
We found three main results: (1) that the size of a base had little effect on learning, (2) that learners struggled to acquire multiplicative rules while learning additive rules more easily, (3) learning numbers in a count routine improved memory for words, but impaired map them to meanings.
drbarner.bsky.social
So, we trained adults on a bunch of bases, with and without counting structure, and tested both their recall of trained words, and their ability to "guess" the labels for untrained words (e.g., they were trained up to 10 and tested up to 20).
drbarner.bsky.social
Second, studies find that kids are slow to notice rules for combining numbers. But rules only become apparent in base-10 systems once you count past ~30 when structures begin to repeat. This raises the possibility rules might emerge earlier in systems that require rules for smaller numbers
drbarner.bsky.social
Two things are interesting: First, children learning base-10 typically learn number words as part of a counting system, though historically this has not always been the case, and some number systems - especially those with bases - do not.