Dr Lynette Pretorius
drlpretorius.bsky.social
Dr Lynette Pretorius
@drlpretorius.bsky.social
Lecturer @educationmonash.bsky.social | She/Her | Views My Own

Interested in doctoral education, AI literacy, research literacy, academic identity, and student wellbeing.

www.lynettepretorius.com
https://www.youtube.com/@drlpretorius
I'll share that platform with colleagues. Preprinting is less common in my current field (Education). It was much more common in my previous field (Medicine). I think many people in my current field are just not aware of how it works and that they are actually allowed to do it.
January 24, 2026 at 9:06 PM
I routinely preprint my work now, given the craziness of the publication system...
January 24, 2026 at 9:01 PM
I hope you like it! We wanted to publish open access, but the university's publishing agreement was exhausted. So we put it up as preprint so that everyone could still access it.
January 23, 2026 at 6:58 AM
Two per year would probably be my max, but if the conferences are online only, maybe one more. I guess it depends on how much else you have to do, but with teaching and research commitments, I couldn't do more than that.
January 20, 2026 at 1:44 PM
Finally, I am particularly well-known for my methodological explanations of the theoretical aspects of autoethnography (doi.org/10.1007/978-...; open-access version: doi.org/10.26180/203... ) and its practical application (doi.org/10.1007/978-...; open-access version: doi.org/10.26180/259... ).
A Harmony of Voices: The Value of Collaborative Autoethnography as Collective Witnessing During a Pandemic
In this chapter, I describe collaborative autoethnography—the methodology which was chosen for this book. In order to clearly explain this methodology, I explore my own journey as I moved into social science research, discovered autoethnography, and subsequently encountered collaborative autoethnography. Through my reflections, I highlight the knowledge which can be gained through purposeful exploration of personal experience. I also demonstrate how, when multiple autoethnographers work together, the resulting collaboration creates a profound synergy and harmony of voices which cannot be achieved by an individual alone. Finally, I present the specific framework used to apply the collaborative autoethnography methodology in this book.
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I recently explored how pseudonyms and demographics are used, showing that it is much more ethical and empowering to give participants space to choose their own names (doi.org/10.1080/1743...; open-access: doi.org/10.26180/274... ) and how they are presented in research (doi.org/10.1080/1743...).
What’s in a name? Participants’ pseudonym choices as a practice of empowerment and epistemic justice
In qualitative research, using pseudonyms for participants is a common practice. This paper examines how inviting participants to choose their pseudonyms contributes to epistemic justice in the res...
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I also showed how GenAI can be a legitimate source of data generation in autoethnography (doi.org/10.26180/299... ).
Seeing Myself in Pixels: Autoethnographic Reflections with GenAI on the Stories We Fight To Keep
This essay explores the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) as a co-creative partner in autoethnographic research and teaching, focusing on the production of creative artefacts as evidence. Centring on my use of GenAI to create two representative images of my academic identity as both educator and researcher, I reflect on the iterative and dialogic process of prompting, interpretation, and refinement that characterised this visual inquiry. These images, initially intended to be published in a book chapter on GenAI, served not only as evocative representations but also as catalysts for deep self-reflection and theoretical exploration. Despite the profound insights I gained through this visual journey, the figures which were so central to my sense-making were ultimately silenced by the gatekeeping logic of existing publication norms. Denied a place in the formal publication, I gave the images life elsewhere through an open-access repository and cited them in the final published chapter. In this way, I used the academic citation norms as a subtle defiance, a deliberate move against the constraints that sought to erase part of my scholarly voice. I have since extended this innovation into the classroom, developing a pedagogical approach where students use GenAI to visualise and narrate aspects of their own identities in their own autoethnographic projects. This essay illuminates both the empowering possibilities and institutional barriers encountered when introducing novel modes of research sharing. By foregrounding visual evidence co-created with GenAI, this work advocates for more inclusive, imaginative, and multimodal approaches to academic expression.
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I have also been exploring the implications of GenAI on the research process. I showed that GenAI can foster researchers' higher-order thinking and reflexivity as a partner in data analysis (doi.org/10.1080/1478...; open-access version: doi.org/10.26180/283... ).
Exploring ChatGPT’s potential as a qualitative research partner: researcher and participant perspectives on AI-generated insights
The increasing presence of generative AI in research presents both opportunities and challenges for qualitative data analysis. While generative AI tools such as ChatGPT can assist with pattern reco...
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
Ontology, epistemology, and axiology cause significant confusion for researchers, so I created a practical, easy-to-understand introductory paper that explains each term and how they can be combined. The paper has been downloaded nearly 30,000 times! #AcademicSuccess 🎉 doi.org/10.46743/216...
Demystifying Research Paradigms: Navigating Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology in Research
A sound understanding of research paradigms is crucial for developing coherent and philosophically grounded research designs, particularly in the humanities and social sciences. This paper offers an a...
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I'm particularly interested in how PhD students learn to navigate the hidden norms of academia (doi.org/10.1080/0022...; open-access version: doi.org/10.26180/142... ). Currently, I am exploring how students’ cultural backgrounds, personal experiences, and social resources shape their journeys.
Notions of Human Capital and Academic Identity in the PhD: Narratives of the Disempowered
An important component of PhD students’ educational experiences is the understanding they develop of their academic identity. In this study, we explore PhD students’ expectations and lived realitie...
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I have also written two books about the lived experiences of PhD students navigating academia (doi.org/10.1007/978-... and doi.org/10.1007/978-... ). These practical books offered students a platform to share their own stories, allowing me to reveal the invisible culture of doctoral education.
Wellbeing in Doctoral Education
This book offers personal stories that highlight the diverse voices of doctoral students. It calls for an academic environment where PhD skills are developed in concert with the skills needed to maint...
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
Some of my favourite papers about writing groups include: doi.org/10.1016/j.st...
ijds.org/Volume17/IJD... and doi.org/10.1080/1462...
Redirecting
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I have written widely about writing groups in doctoral education (see www.lynettepretorius.com/research-pro...). I argue that writing groups are not just about getting words on the page - they are where researchers learn the craft of academia.
Research Projects – Dr Lynette Pretorius
www.lynettepretorius.com
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I also worked with colleagues to develop an ETHICAL AI use framework for higher education (doi.org/10.37074/jal...).
Navigating ethical challenges in generative AI-enhanced research: The ETHICAL framework for responsible generative AI use | Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
At the moment, I am particularly interested in the equity and ethical dimensions of GenAI in academia. I wrote a paper with my students (doi.org/10.1016/j.ih...) demonstrating how GenAI can empower scholars from non-English-speaking backgrounds, helping to democratise and decolonise academia.
Redirecting
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I have since developed this definition into a comprehensive framework of AI literacy (doi.org/10.1201/9781...; open-access version: doi.org/10.26180/259... ), showing that AI literacy comprises five domains: foundational, conceptual, social, ethical, and socio-emotional.
The AI Literacy Framework for Higher Education | 3 | A Grounded Theory
This chapter investigates the experiences of two higher education lecturers as they adapted to the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) over the
doi.org
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM
I have done a lot of work on AI literacy in higher education recently. I was one of the first to try to define AI literacy in the age of GenAI (journal.aall.org.au/index.php/ja... ).
Fostering AI literacy: A teaching practice reflection | Journal of Academic Language and Learning
journal.aall.org.au
January 20, 2026 at 1:59 AM