Gabe J. Murphy
@drsmurph.bsky.social
61 followers 96 following 37 posts
I care deeply about: (i) air, 💦, and soil; (ii) the animals and 🌱 that these resources support; and (iii) describing compelling scientific questions and insights to a variety of audiences. https://ocr.ucsf.edu/people/gabe-murphy
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
drsmurph.bsky.social
Thanks for mentioning and recommending 'Perfect Days' @romanmars.bsky.social. We watched and _really_ enjoyed it last night.
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
liobaenk.bsky.social
Wonderful piece by @megancarey.bsky.social on how @network-alba.bsky.social is tackling inequities in (neuro)science and building more inclusive research communities! ✨

#DEI #DiversityInScience #DiversityInSTEM #neuroscience #cognitivescience #neuroskyence #academia
drsmurph.bsky.social
He continued: “I’m kind of sicko; I love putting in the work. I love getting to practice. I love getting to live out my dreams. But at the end of the day, sometimes I just don’t understand the point."
drsmurph.bsky.social
One of several really thoughtful, honest reflections from Scottie Scheffler.

Being the best golfer in the world is "is not a fulfilling life. It’s fulfilling from the sense of accomplishment, but it’s not fulfilling from a sense of the deepest places of your heart.”

www.nytimes.com/athletic/649...
Think you understand Scottie Scheffler? Think again.
www.nytimes.com
drsmurph.bsky.social
100% agree @nicolecrust.bsky.social.
Equally strong recommendation for another book (roughly) in this same genre - Kathryn Schulz's 'Lost and Found'.
drsmurph.bsky.social
Good for you @tuthill.bsky.social. Both for serving on study section and sharing the/your experience with others.
drsmurph.bsky.social
Read the Politics and Opinion sections of any one newspaper with a skeptical eye, and, when possible, sampel the Politics and Opinions sections of multiple papers. (It's both interesting, and informative, to see what is and isn't said in the NYT and WSJ, for example...)
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
altnih4science.bsky.social
do read the Times— they have enormous resources and great reporters— but read the Politics and Opinion sections with a skeptical eye. And then read indep political news too- TPM, the Prospect, the Guardian, the Inquirer, ProPublica, etc.
drsmurph.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing this @rdhernand.bsky.social; this finally made it 100% clear (if it wasn't already) that I and others that have been watching from the sidelines need to jump into the fray. It's 'go time'.
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
rdhernand.bsky.social
I have learned that the directors of ALL: PREP, IMSD, and IRACDA programs across the country have received similar cancelation notices. This follows previous cancellations of MARC and URISE programs. This further dismantles the mechanisms that enable scientific training opportunities for SO MANY.
rdhernand.bsky.social
You want to know the best way to show thanks for chairing a study section? Early the next morning sent them a termination notice for their PREP training grant.
rdhernand.bsky.social
Just completed day 2 of chairing a NIH study section. Brain is tired after intently listening and leading discussions of ~40 apps. So fulfilling to hear the passion people have for others' science, and heartwarming to see so many people who care about the training and environment of others 🫶 (299!)
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
vscooper.micropopbio.org
Many people, including academics, don't understand what F&A is for. Please share to help.

1) Translate to "overhead" in common business accounting:
60% IDC => 60/160 = 37.5% overhead (low!)

2) Infographic explaining what it's for, linked here:
www.cogr.edu/sites/defaul...
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
nicolecrust.bsky.social
My wish: That every scientist who is passionately advocating for science here will take their same message and also broadcast it in some other venue.

We need to get the message out to those who haven’t yet heard it (and are not yet convinced).

Please consider it 🙏
drsmurph.bsky.social
Not exactly 'broadcasting', but I've reached out to two Republican-leaning folks in my circle:
• One didn't know what the NIH (or NSF) does and was open to learning more -> an opportunity to inform.
• The other is very familiar with NIH, but wasn't aware how this change will impact biotech.
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
katestarbird.bsky.social
Here’s a strategy: 1) establish the frames, what problems will these changes cause, how will they impact communities; 2) inspire people to use those frames to tell their own stories of their families or communities are impacted; 3) amplify those stories.
katestarbird.bsky.social
Scientists and journalists need to figure out right quick how to explain to the average person how a massive change in research indirects will impact the medical care they and their children get (eg at the local children’s hospital), the education their children will get, the price of tuition, etc.
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
lizneeley.bsky.social
Neuroscientists - your society has a call to action for you and a page for tracking action alerts.

It's built to take your location & give you specific support on what to say and who to say it to. www.sfn.org/Advocacy/Adv...
Screenshot showing example of how the Society For Neuroscience call to action gives a Bay Area user contact info for their representatives (Sen. Alex Padilla, Sen. Adam Schiff, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi) and and email template titled "Protect Biomedical Research and Scientific Workforce"
drsmurph.bsky.social
Such conversations are important everywhere, but especially in 'Swing States' - e.g., Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, etc..
drsmurph.bsky.social
Agree with Stephens that Dems should 'get to know Trump voters, and not just through data analysis or comments by their most idiotic, caricaturish champions. If Democrats continue to stereotype those voters as a bunch of racist, misogynistic yahoos, they will be unable to understand the country.'
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
kitdewaal.com
The beautiful London Library offers emerging writers one year’s free membership including masterclasses, networking opportunities, peer support, access to all the Library’s resources and publication in an anthology. Details below.

Please share :)

www.londonlibrary.co.uk/about-us/ll-...
Picture of the interior of the London Library, with steps, many bookcases and a glass balustrade
drsmurph.bsky.social
Engage Republican-leaning family / friends with (i) verifiable info and (2) your opinion: 'Destroying the NIH, NSF, CDC, FDA, and USAID will (I) not save much $ and (iI) have a hugely negative impact…'
[A family member responded well to this, and even admitted he'd heard of the CDC but not NIH/NSF.]
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
altnih4science.bsky.social
So, what can scientists do?

- Talk to the public; try to drive public attention.
- Find other scientists to talk to and work with.
- Get universities and rich ppl involved.
- Work on the science attacks - but weave them together with the constitutional attacks.

More tomorrow. Be well.
9/9
Reposted by Gabe J. Murphy
ezralevin.bsky.social
When I was a Hill staffer in 2009, a Dem trifecta was trying to pass universal healthcare. In response, Senate GOP released a memo detailing all of the tactics they in the minority could use to delay the effort as much as possible. I'm recirculating that 2009 GOP memo here. Take inspiration from it.