“Propaganda” isn’t a magic word to make evidence you don’t want to face disappear. But given the way Israel is currently ramping up its own evidence-denying propaganda (aka Hasbara) it takes a special kind of ghoulish chutzpah to aim the accusation at those seeing Israeli war crimes on video.

As you well know, not only do Israeli forces regularly and openly use Palestinians as human shields, but Israel has even conducted polls that show Israeli citizens approve. Your brazen, morality-free chutzpah is the most Israeli thing about you.

apnews.com/article/isra...

Sorry, your facts are wrong: Israel was regularly killing Palestinians right up to October 7 - just as they have continued killing and starving them since the latest fake “ceasefire”. None of this began October 7, and none of the babies and children were Hamas. Stop justifying genocide.

The Israeli army killed more than 100 Palestinians, including 46 children, in the Gaza Strip since Tuesday evening. Unfortunately to people like you, only Israelis count as human.

If you actually read them both, you’d see that one article says reheating makes it worse if you use too much heat but even at lower temperatures makes no difference. The BBC article, on the other hand, says reheating makes resistant starch get even more resistant.

But Republican gerrymandering is a-ok with the courts? GTFOH

“Yes, the ceasefire is off when we want to kill you, but it’s back on the minute we’re done. And if you retaliate we’ll blame you for violating the ceasefire.”

Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article.

It’s the part where they say that reheating it too hot will reduce resistant starch. But the BBC reports that reheating will actually *increase* resistant starch

We have an issue with your reporting: according to a study referenced in this BBC piece, reheating cold actually *increases* resistant starch. Can you update your reporting to address this? www.bbc.com/news/magazin...

If you read the article you would know they talked about that.

“Typically” is the squishy word: it doesn’t mean the stops *must* be brief and to the point. He could have said “as long as they are brief, nonviolent and make a swift determination” but he chose not to. But he’s probably quite proud of this fact.

We’re in the middle of an unprecedented authoritarian putsch - and flag-burning is your big conservative issue?

This is just embarrassing.

Starving sick children is *better* to you? Seriously?

You really are a monster.

I kept waiting for him to recover his moral sense but he has dug into pure evil. It’s so painful because on almost all other topics he is clear and adjusts his thinking when there is new information. But on Gaza he is intellectually shut down.

“And complaining about Israel intentionally starving children in Gaza is also antisemitic.”

That’s just a vibes complaint. We don’t have the power to help them, only they do. As I look at old video of Texas voters refusing money to build flood protection, and then see them blame Democrats for the deaths, I see keeping the painful truth before their eyes makes change more possible.

This is at least the second time they’ve overridden a policy approved by a majority of voters - but the voters voted for them again anyway. What are supposed to do?

Nice. Then again doing whatever I wanted has not made me any less obscure.