In the end, voting for the lesser evil is voting for less evil.
Not voting is saying that evil won't hurt me.

you can tell JD’s been stewing in Euro/UK/Canada immigration discourse too much because no American’s primary complaint about undocumented immigrants is that they contribute too little to housing supply. You hear it more in countries with more public housing & fewer immigrants in construction

Air travelers: "delays suck and airlines frequently rip us off"

Sean Duffy: "I hear you. What if, in response, we make it easier again for airlines to rip you off while I harass you about what you wear to fly & also try & micromanage food offerings at the airport?"

Too many people think their vote is their personal “brand” … instead of hiring the best of two imperfect options for an important job. “Hiring either of these security guards is beneath me, let that creepy incel in the next office choose. My hands are clean.”

The average social media lefter-than-thou would rather completely sacrifice decades of progress than compromise even the slightest iota.

To them, 0% is better than 99%. I'll never understand it.

The other terrible thing is that it would not be civil conflict between states but within states— urban enters on one side, rural areas on the other. First order of business is getting control of airports and seaports for supplies.

LMAO of *course* you're disappointed at the dude who actually knows how electoral politics works, you've been sold a fantasy by people with no interest in actually gaining power.